Incorporating Dis/ability Studies and Critical Race Theory to combat systematic exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color in clinical neuroscience

This article reviews some of the ideological forces contributing to the systematic exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) in clinical neuroscience. Limitations of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and other methods systematically exclude individuals with coarse or cu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teresa Girolamo, Termara C. Parker, Inge-Marie Eigsti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2022.988092/full
_version_ 1798001928134721536
author Teresa Girolamo
Termara C. Parker
Inge-Marie Eigsti
author_facet Teresa Girolamo
Termara C. Parker
Inge-Marie Eigsti
author_sort Teresa Girolamo
collection DOAJ
description This article reviews some of the ideological forces contributing to the systematic exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) in clinical neuroscience. Limitations of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and other methods systematically exclude individuals with coarse or curly hair and darker skin. Despite these well-known limitations, clinical neuroscience manuscripts frequently fail to report participant race or ethnicity or reasons for excluding participants. Grounding the discussion in Dis/ability Studies and Critical Race Theory (DisCrit), we review factors that exacerbate exclusion and contribute to the multiple marginalization of BIPOC, including (a) general methodological issues, (b) perceptions about race and disability, and (c) underreporting of methods. We also present solutions. Just as scientific practices changed in response to the replication crisis, we advocate for greater attention to the crisis of underrepresentation in clinical neuroscience and provide strategies that serve to make the field more inclusive.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T11:44:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e68f359f42945ed900bc24ac8d0c3a1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-453X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T11:44:02Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-0e68f359f42945ed900bc24ac8d0c3a12022-12-22T04:25:40ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2022-09-011610.3389/fnins.2022.988092988092Incorporating Dis/ability Studies and Critical Race Theory to combat systematic exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color in clinical neuroscienceTeresa Girolamo0Termara C. Parker1Inge-Marie Eigsti2Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United StatesInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United StatesDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United StatesThis article reviews some of the ideological forces contributing to the systematic exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) in clinical neuroscience. Limitations of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and other methods systematically exclude individuals with coarse or curly hair and darker skin. Despite these well-known limitations, clinical neuroscience manuscripts frequently fail to report participant race or ethnicity or reasons for excluding participants. Grounding the discussion in Dis/ability Studies and Critical Race Theory (DisCrit), we review factors that exacerbate exclusion and contribute to the multiple marginalization of BIPOC, including (a) general methodological issues, (b) perceptions about race and disability, and (c) underreporting of methods. We also present solutions. Just as scientific practices changed in response to the replication crisis, we advocate for greater attention to the crisis of underrepresentation in clinical neuroscience and provide strategies that serve to make the field more inclusive.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2022.988092/fullunderrepresentationclinical neuroscienceBIPOCDisCrit Theoryadvocacy
spellingShingle Teresa Girolamo
Termara C. Parker
Inge-Marie Eigsti
Incorporating Dis/ability Studies and Critical Race Theory to combat systematic exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color in clinical neuroscience
Frontiers in Neuroscience
underrepresentation
clinical neuroscience
BIPOC
DisCrit Theory
advocacy
title Incorporating Dis/ability Studies and Critical Race Theory to combat systematic exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color in clinical neuroscience
title_full Incorporating Dis/ability Studies and Critical Race Theory to combat systematic exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color in clinical neuroscience
title_fullStr Incorporating Dis/ability Studies and Critical Race Theory to combat systematic exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color in clinical neuroscience
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating Dis/ability Studies and Critical Race Theory to combat systematic exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color in clinical neuroscience
title_short Incorporating Dis/ability Studies and Critical Race Theory to combat systematic exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color in clinical neuroscience
title_sort incorporating dis ability studies and critical race theory to combat systematic exclusion of black indigenous and people of color in clinical neuroscience
topic underrepresentation
clinical neuroscience
BIPOC
DisCrit Theory
advocacy
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2022.988092/full
work_keys_str_mv AT teresagirolamo incorporatingdisabilitystudiesandcriticalracetheorytocombatsystematicexclusionofblackindigenousandpeopleofcolorinclinicalneuroscience
AT termaracparker incorporatingdisabilitystudiesandcriticalracetheorytocombatsystematicexclusionofblackindigenousandpeopleofcolorinclinicalneuroscience
AT ingemarieeigsti incorporatingdisabilitystudiesandcriticalracetheorytocombatsystematicexclusionofblackindigenousandpeopleofcolorinclinicalneuroscience