Comparison of the Ability of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) Systems and Endoscopists to Detect Colorectal Neoplastic Lesions on Endoscopy Video

Artificial-intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems have developed remarkably in recent years. These systems can help increase the adenoma detection rate (ADR), an important quality indicator in colonoscopies. While there have been many still-image-based studies on the usefulness of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yoshitsugu Misumi, Kouichi Nonaka, Miharu Takeuchi, Yu Kamitani, Yasuhiro Uechi, Mai Watanabe, Maiko Kishino, Teppei Omori, Maria Yonezawa, Hajime Isomoto, Katsutoshi Tokushige
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-07-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/14/4840
_version_ 1797588808134295552
author Yoshitsugu Misumi
Kouichi Nonaka
Miharu Takeuchi
Yu Kamitani
Yasuhiro Uechi
Mai Watanabe
Maiko Kishino
Teppei Omori
Maria Yonezawa
Hajime Isomoto
Katsutoshi Tokushige
author_facet Yoshitsugu Misumi
Kouichi Nonaka
Miharu Takeuchi
Yu Kamitani
Yasuhiro Uechi
Mai Watanabe
Maiko Kishino
Teppei Omori
Maria Yonezawa
Hajime Isomoto
Katsutoshi Tokushige
author_sort Yoshitsugu Misumi
collection DOAJ
description Artificial-intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems have developed remarkably in recent years. These systems can help increase the adenoma detection rate (ADR), an important quality indicator in colonoscopies. While there have been many still-image-based studies on the usefulness of CAD, few have reported on its usefulness using actual clinical videos. However, no studies have compared the CAD group and control groups using the exact same case videos. This study aimed to determine whether CAD or endoscopists were superior in identifying colorectal neoplastic lesions in videos. In this study, we examined 34 lesions from 21 cases. CAD performed better than four of the six endoscopists (three experts and three beginners), including all the beginners. The time to lesion detection with beginners and experts was 2.147 ± 1.118 s and 1.394 ± 0.805 s, respectively, with significant differences between beginners and experts (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and between beginners and CAD (both <i>p</i> < 0.001). The time to lesion detection was significantly shorter for experts and CAD than for beginners. No significant difference was found between experts and CAD (<i>p</i> = 1.000). CAD could be useful as a diagnostic support tool for beginners to bridge the experience gap with experts.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T00:57:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e6a12682475438990f204f795d4db39
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T00:57:19Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-0e6a12682475438990f204f795d4db392023-11-18T19:54:46ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-07-011214484010.3390/jcm12144840Comparison of the Ability of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) Systems and Endoscopists to Detect Colorectal Neoplastic Lesions on Endoscopy VideoYoshitsugu Misumi0Kouichi Nonaka1Miharu Takeuchi2Yu Kamitani3Yasuhiro Uechi4Mai Watanabe5Maiko Kishino6Teppei Omori7Maria Yonezawa8Hajime Isomoto9Katsutoshi Tokushige10Department of Digestive Endoscopy, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, 8-1, Kawada-Chou, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo 162-8666, JapanDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, 8-1, Kawada-Chou, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo 162-8666, JapanDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, 8-1, Kawada-Chou, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo 162-8666, JapanDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, 8-1, Kawada-Chou, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo 162-8666, JapanDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, 8-1, Kawada-Chou, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo 162-8666, JapanDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, 8-1, Kawada-Chou, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo 162-8666, JapanDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, 8-1, Kawada-Chou, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo 162-8666, JapanInstitute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, 8-1, Kawada-Chou, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo 162-8666, JapanInstitute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, 8-1, Kawada-Chou, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo 162-8666, JapanDivision of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1, Nishi-Chou, Yonago 683-8504, JapanInstitute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, 8-1, Kawada-Chou, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo 162-8666, JapanArtificial-intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems have developed remarkably in recent years. These systems can help increase the adenoma detection rate (ADR), an important quality indicator in colonoscopies. While there have been many still-image-based studies on the usefulness of CAD, few have reported on its usefulness using actual clinical videos. However, no studies have compared the CAD group and control groups using the exact same case videos. This study aimed to determine whether CAD or endoscopists were superior in identifying colorectal neoplastic lesions in videos. In this study, we examined 34 lesions from 21 cases. CAD performed better than four of the six endoscopists (three experts and three beginners), including all the beginners. The time to lesion detection with beginners and experts was 2.147 ± 1.118 s and 1.394 ± 0.805 s, respectively, with significant differences between beginners and experts (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and between beginners and CAD (both <i>p</i> < 0.001). The time to lesion detection was significantly shorter for experts and CAD than for beginners. No significant difference was found between experts and CAD (<i>p</i> = 1.000). CAD could be useful as a diagnostic support tool for beginners to bridge the experience gap with experts.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/14/4840computer-aided detection/diagnosiscolorectal polypcolonoscopy
spellingShingle Yoshitsugu Misumi
Kouichi Nonaka
Miharu Takeuchi
Yu Kamitani
Yasuhiro Uechi
Mai Watanabe
Maiko Kishino
Teppei Omori
Maria Yonezawa
Hajime Isomoto
Katsutoshi Tokushige
Comparison of the Ability of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) Systems and Endoscopists to Detect Colorectal Neoplastic Lesions on Endoscopy Video
Journal of Clinical Medicine
computer-aided detection/diagnosis
colorectal polyp
colonoscopy
title Comparison of the Ability of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) Systems and Endoscopists to Detect Colorectal Neoplastic Lesions on Endoscopy Video
title_full Comparison of the Ability of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) Systems and Endoscopists to Detect Colorectal Neoplastic Lesions on Endoscopy Video
title_fullStr Comparison of the Ability of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) Systems and Endoscopists to Detect Colorectal Neoplastic Lesions on Endoscopy Video
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Ability of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) Systems and Endoscopists to Detect Colorectal Neoplastic Lesions on Endoscopy Video
title_short Comparison of the Ability of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) Systems and Endoscopists to Detect Colorectal Neoplastic Lesions on Endoscopy Video
title_sort comparison of the ability of artificial intelligence based computer aided detection cad systems and endoscopists to detect colorectal neoplastic lesions on endoscopy video
topic computer-aided detection/diagnosis
colorectal polyp
colonoscopy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/14/4840
work_keys_str_mv AT yoshitsugumisumi comparisonoftheabilityofartificialintelligencebasedcomputeraideddetectioncadsystemsandendoscopiststodetectcolorectalneoplasticlesionsonendoscopyvideo
AT kouichinonaka comparisonoftheabilityofartificialintelligencebasedcomputeraideddetectioncadsystemsandendoscopiststodetectcolorectalneoplasticlesionsonendoscopyvideo
AT miharutakeuchi comparisonoftheabilityofartificialintelligencebasedcomputeraideddetectioncadsystemsandendoscopiststodetectcolorectalneoplasticlesionsonendoscopyvideo
AT yukamitani comparisonoftheabilityofartificialintelligencebasedcomputeraideddetectioncadsystemsandendoscopiststodetectcolorectalneoplasticlesionsonendoscopyvideo
AT yasuhirouechi comparisonoftheabilityofartificialintelligencebasedcomputeraideddetectioncadsystemsandendoscopiststodetectcolorectalneoplasticlesionsonendoscopyvideo
AT maiwatanabe comparisonoftheabilityofartificialintelligencebasedcomputeraideddetectioncadsystemsandendoscopiststodetectcolorectalneoplasticlesionsonendoscopyvideo
AT maikokishino comparisonoftheabilityofartificialintelligencebasedcomputeraideddetectioncadsystemsandendoscopiststodetectcolorectalneoplasticlesionsonendoscopyvideo
AT teppeiomori comparisonoftheabilityofartificialintelligencebasedcomputeraideddetectioncadsystemsandendoscopiststodetectcolorectalneoplasticlesionsonendoscopyvideo
AT mariayonezawa comparisonoftheabilityofartificialintelligencebasedcomputeraideddetectioncadsystemsandendoscopiststodetectcolorectalneoplasticlesionsonendoscopyvideo
AT hajimeisomoto comparisonoftheabilityofartificialintelligencebasedcomputeraideddetectioncadsystemsandendoscopiststodetectcolorectalneoplasticlesionsonendoscopyvideo
AT katsutoshitokushige comparisonoftheabilityofartificialintelligencebasedcomputeraideddetectioncadsystemsandendoscopiststodetectcolorectalneoplasticlesionsonendoscopyvideo