Government intervention, internal control, and technology innovation of SMEs in China
Under the innovation-driven development strategy, the improvement of the core competitiveness of enterprises demonstrates increasing dependence on the ability of technological innovation. In this article, data of A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2008 to 2018 were...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022-08-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.960025/full |
_version_ | 1811222031834808320 |
---|---|
author | Sun Ye Sun Yi Shao Fangjing Qi Yuzhu |
author_facet | Sun Ye Sun Yi Shao Fangjing Qi Yuzhu |
author_sort | Sun Ye |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Under the innovation-driven development strategy, the improvement of the core competitiveness of enterprises demonstrates increasing dependence on the ability of technological innovation. In this article, data of A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2008 to 2018 were selected as research samples for the analysis of the influencing factors and mechanism of enterprise technological innovation from the dual perspectives of the external economic environment and internal management system based on the use of the fixed-effect model. The results show that government intervention significantly hinders enterprises' investment in resources for technological innovation, and less government intervention can improve the innovation investment of enterprises. The intervention of internal control fails to bring institutional advantages; rather, it aggravates the negative effect of government intervention on enterprise technological innovation. The research enriches the existing academic research results on government intervention, internal control quality, and enterprise technological innovation. The findings provide experience for accelerating the marketization process in China, enterprise governance, and improving the level of enterprise technological innovation. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T08:09:43Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0e6e8160a07f46e4914404070cb46eea |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1664-1078 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T08:09:43Z |
publishDate | 2022-08-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Psychology |
spelling | doaj.art-0e6e8160a07f46e4914404070cb46eea2022-12-22T03:41:01ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782022-08-011310.3389/fpsyg.2022.960025960025Government intervention, internal control, and technology innovation of SMEs in ChinaSun Ye0Sun Yi1Shao Fangjing2Qi Yuzhu3Business and Management School, Jilin University, Changchun, ChinaBusiness and Management School, Jilin University, Changchun, ChinaCollege of Accounting, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun, ChinaSchool of Economics, Jilin University, Changchun, ChinaUnder the innovation-driven development strategy, the improvement of the core competitiveness of enterprises demonstrates increasing dependence on the ability of technological innovation. In this article, data of A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2008 to 2018 were selected as research samples for the analysis of the influencing factors and mechanism of enterprise technological innovation from the dual perspectives of the external economic environment and internal management system based on the use of the fixed-effect model. The results show that government intervention significantly hinders enterprises' investment in resources for technological innovation, and less government intervention can improve the innovation investment of enterprises. The intervention of internal control fails to bring institutional advantages; rather, it aggravates the negative effect of government intervention on enterprise technological innovation. The research enriches the existing academic research results on government intervention, internal control quality, and enterprise technological innovation. The findings provide experience for accelerating the marketization process in China, enterprise governance, and improving the level of enterprise technological innovation.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.960025/fullgovernment interventioninternal control qualityenterprise technology innovationChinasmall and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) |
spellingShingle | Sun Ye Sun Yi Shao Fangjing Qi Yuzhu Government intervention, internal control, and technology innovation of SMEs in China Frontiers in Psychology government intervention internal control quality enterprise technology innovation China small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) |
title | Government intervention, internal control, and technology innovation of SMEs in China |
title_full | Government intervention, internal control, and technology innovation of SMEs in China |
title_fullStr | Government intervention, internal control, and technology innovation of SMEs in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Government intervention, internal control, and technology innovation of SMEs in China |
title_short | Government intervention, internal control, and technology innovation of SMEs in China |
title_sort | government intervention internal control and technology innovation of smes in china |
topic | government intervention internal control quality enterprise technology innovation China small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.960025/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunye governmentinterventioninternalcontrolandtechnologyinnovationofsmesinchina AT sunyi governmentinterventioninternalcontrolandtechnologyinnovationofsmesinchina AT shaofangjing governmentinterventioninternalcontrolandtechnologyinnovationofsmesinchina AT qiyuzhu governmentinterventioninternalcontrolandtechnologyinnovationofsmesinchina |