A review of thermal comfort

Thermal comfort is defined as “that state of mind which expresses satisfaction with the thermal environment” (ANSI/ASHRAE, 2017). The definition of thermal comfort leaves open as to what is meant by condition of mind or satisfaction, but it correctly emphasizes that the judgment of comfort is a cog...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Xiaoyu Du
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Delft University of Technology 2019-11-01
Series:A+BE: Architecture and the Built Environment
Online Access:https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/abe/article/view/4103
_version_ 1811154504174796800
author Xiaoyu Du
author_facet Xiaoyu Du
author_sort Xiaoyu Du
collection DOAJ
description Thermal comfort is defined as “that state of mind which expresses satisfaction with the thermal environment” (ANSI/ASHRAE, 2017). The definition of thermal comfort leaves open as to what is meant by condition of mind or satisfaction, but it correctly emphasizes that the judgment of comfort is a cognitive process involving many inputs related to physical, physiological, psychological, and other factors (Lin & Deng, 2008). People are always in an internal or external thermal environment. The human body produces heat and exchanges heat with the external environment. During normal activities these processes result in an average core body temperature of approximately 37 °C (Prek, 2005). This stable core body temperature is essential for our health and well-being. Our thermal interaction with the environment is directed towards maintaining this stability in a process called “thermoregulation” (Nicol, Humphreys, & Roaf, 2012). Thermal comfort plays an important role in the energy consumption of buildings. So, researchers spent decades to find the appropriate approaches and models which evaluate and predict thermal comfort. A literature review of the current knowledge on thermal comfort shows two different approaches for thermal comfort, each one with its potentialities and limits: the heat-balance model and the adaptive model (Doherty & Arens, 1988). The heat-balance approach is based on analysis of the heat flows in and around the body and resulted in a model based on physics and physiology. Data from climate chamber studies was used to support this model. The best wellknown heat-balance models are the predicted mean vote (PMV) (Fanger, 1970) and the standard effective temperature (SET) (Gagge, Fobelets, & Berglund, 1986). The PMV model is particularly important because it forms the basis for most national and international comfort standards. The adaptive approach is based on field surveys of people’s response to the environment, using statistical analysis and leads to an “empirical” model (Nicol et al., 2012).
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:16:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e6f836be2a94d32940b9e1fd63a584b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2212-3202
2214-7233
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:16:48Z
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher Delft University of Technology
record_format Article
series A+BE: Architecture and the Built Environment
spelling doaj.art-0e6f836be2a94d32940b9e1fd63a584b2023-03-11T23:02:16ZengDelft University of TechnologyA+BE: Architecture and the Built Environment2212-32022214-72332019-11-0191010.7480/abe.19.10.4103A review of thermal comfortXiaoyu Du0TU Delft, Architecture and the Built Environment Thermal comfort is defined as “that state of mind which expresses satisfaction with the thermal environment” (ANSI/ASHRAE, 2017). The definition of thermal comfort leaves open as to what is meant by condition of mind or satisfaction, but it correctly emphasizes that the judgment of comfort is a cognitive process involving many inputs related to physical, physiological, psychological, and other factors (Lin & Deng, 2008). People are always in an internal or external thermal environment. The human body produces heat and exchanges heat with the external environment. During normal activities these processes result in an average core body temperature of approximately 37 °C (Prek, 2005). This stable core body temperature is essential for our health and well-being. Our thermal interaction with the environment is directed towards maintaining this stability in a process called “thermoregulation” (Nicol, Humphreys, & Roaf, 2012). Thermal comfort plays an important role in the energy consumption of buildings. So, researchers spent decades to find the appropriate approaches and models which evaluate and predict thermal comfort. A literature review of the current knowledge on thermal comfort shows two different approaches for thermal comfort, each one with its potentialities and limits: the heat-balance model and the adaptive model (Doherty & Arens, 1988). The heat-balance approach is based on analysis of the heat flows in and around the body and resulted in a model based on physics and physiology. Data from climate chamber studies was used to support this model. The best wellknown heat-balance models are the predicted mean vote (PMV) (Fanger, 1970) and the standard effective temperature (SET) (Gagge, Fobelets, & Berglund, 1986). The PMV model is particularly important because it forms the basis for most national and international comfort standards. The adaptive approach is based on field surveys of people’s response to the environment, using statistical analysis and leads to an “empirical” model (Nicol et al., 2012). https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/abe/article/view/4103
spellingShingle Xiaoyu Du
A review of thermal comfort
A+BE: Architecture and the Built Environment
title A review of thermal comfort
title_full A review of thermal comfort
title_fullStr A review of thermal comfort
title_full_unstemmed A review of thermal comfort
title_short A review of thermal comfort
title_sort review of thermal comfort
url https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/abe/article/view/4103
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoyudu areviewofthermalcomfort
AT xiaoyudu reviewofthermalcomfort