Comparison of allogeneic stem cell transplantation and non-transplant approaches in elderly patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome: optimal statistical approaches and a critical appraisal of clinical results using non-randomized data.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) from related or unrelated donors may cure patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), a heterogeneous group of clonal stem cell disorders. We analysed 384 elderly patients (55-69 years) with advanced MDS who received either ASCT (n=247) and were reporte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ronald Brand, Hein Putter, Anja van Biezen, Dietger Niederwieser, Rodrigo Martino, Ghulam Mufti, Francesco Onida, Argiris Symeonidis, Christoph Schmid, Laurent Garderet, Marie Robin, Michel van Gelder, Jürgen Finke, Martin Bornhäuser, Guido Kobbe, Ulrich Germing, Theo de Witte, Nicolaus Kröger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3792099?pdf=render
_version_ 1819181709463126016
author Ronald Brand
Hein Putter
Anja van Biezen
Dietger Niederwieser
Rodrigo Martino
Ghulam Mufti
Francesco Onida
Argiris Symeonidis
Christoph Schmid
Laurent Garderet
Marie Robin
Michel van Gelder
Jürgen Finke
Martin Bornhäuser
Guido Kobbe
Ulrich Germing
Theo de Witte
Nicolaus Kröger
author_facet Ronald Brand
Hein Putter
Anja van Biezen
Dietger Niederwieser
Rodrigo Martino
Ghulam Mufti
Francesco Onida
Argiris Symeonidis
Christoph Schmid
Laurent Garderet
Marie Robin
Michel van Gelder
Jürgen Finke
Martin Bornhäuser
Guido Kobbe
Ulrich Germing
Theo de Witte
Nicolaus Kröger
author_sort Ronald Brand
collection DOAJ
description Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) from related or unrelated donors may cure patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), a heterogeneous group of clonal stem cell disorders. We analysed 384 elderly patients (55-69 years) with advanced MDS who received either ASCT (n=247) and were reported to The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) or a non -transplant approach (n=137) reported to the Düsseldorf registry. Besides an attempt to answer the question of "comparison", the purpose of this work is to explain the difficulties in comparing a non-transplant with a transplant cohort, when death before transplant is likely but unknown and the selection of patients for transplant is based on assumptions. It shows which methods are almost always biased and that even the most sophisticated approaches crucially rely on clinical assumptions. Using the most appropriate model for our data, we derive an overall univariate non-significant survival disadvantage for the transplant cohort (HR: 1.29, p = 0.11). We show that such an "average" hazard ratio is however misleading due to non-proportionality of the hazards reflecting early treatment related mortality, the occurring of which is logically correlated with the interval between diagnosis and transplant creating a disproportional drop in the (reconstructed) survival curve of the transplanted patients. Also in multivariate analysis (correcting for age > 60 (HR: 1.4, p = 0.02) and abnormal cytogenetics (HR: 1.46, p = 0.01)), transplantation seems to be worse (HR: 1.39, p = 0.05) but only in the (incorrect but commonly applied) model without time varying covariates. The long term (time depending) hazard ratio is shown to be virtually 1 and overall survival is virtually identical in both groups. Nonetheless no conclusion can be reached from a clinical point of view without assumptions which are by their very nature untestable unless all patients would be followed from diagnosis.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T22:34:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e78316cfeee42b18fd46e52bc7032e6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T22:34:33Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-0e78316cfeee42b18fd46e52bc7032e62022-12-21T18:10:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01810e7436810.1371/journal.pone.0074368Comparison of allogeneic stem cell transplantation and non-transplant approaches in elderly patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome: optimal statistical approaches and a critical appraisal of clinical results using non-randomized data.Ronald BrandHein PutterAnja van BiezenDietger NiederwieserRodrigo MartinoGhulam MuftiFrancesco OnidaArgiris SymeonidisChristoph SchmidLaurent GarderetMarie RobinMichel van GelderJürgen FinkeMartin BornhäuserGuido KobbeUlrich GermingTheo de WitteNicolaus KrögerAllogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) from related or unrelated donors may cure patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), a heterogeneous group of clonal stem cell disorders. We analysed 384 elderly patients (55-69 years) with advanced MDS who received either ASCT (n=247) and were reported to The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) or a non -transplant approach (n=137) reported to the Düsseldorf registry. Besides an attempt to answer the question of "comparison", the purpose of this work is to explain the difficulties in comparing a non-transplant with a transplant cohort, when death before transplant is likely but unknown and the selection of patients for transplant is based on assumptions. It shows which methods are almost always biased and that even the most sophisticated approaches crucially rely on clinical assumptions. Using the most appropriate model for our data, we derive an overall univariate non-significant survival disadvantage for the transplant cohort (HR: 1.29, p = 0.11). We show that such an "average" hazard ratio is however misleading due to non-proportionality of the hazards reflecting early treatment related mortality, the occurring of which is logically correlated with the interval between diagnosis and transplant creating a disproportional drop in the (reconstructed) survival curve of the transplanted patients. Also in multivariate analysis (correcting for age > 60 (HR: 1.4, p = 0.02) and abnormal cytogenetics (HR: 1.46, p = 0.01)), transplantation seems to be worse (HR: 1.39, p = 0.05) but only in the (incorrect but commonly applied) model without time varying covariates. The long term (time depending) hazard ratio is shown to be virtually 1 and overall survival is virtually identical in both groups. Nonetheless no conclusion can be reached from a clinical point of view without assumptions which are by their very nature untestable unless all patients would be followed from diagnosis.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3792099?pdf=render
spellingShingle Ronald Brand
Hein Putter
Anja van Biezen
Dietger Niederwieser
Rodrigo Martino
Ghulam Mufti
Francesco Onida
Argiris Symeonidis
Christoph Schmid
Laurent Garderet
Marie Robin
Michel van Gelder
Jürgen Finke
Martin Bornhäuser
Guido Kobbe
Ulrich Germing
Theo de Witte
Nicolaus Kröger
Comparison of allogeneic stem cell transplantation and non-transplant approaches in elderly patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome: optimal statistical approaches and a critical appraisal of clinical results using non-randomized data.
PLoS ONE
title Comparison of allogeneic stem cell transplantation and non-transplant approaches in elderly patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome: optimal statistical approaches and a critical appraisal of clinical results using non-randomized data.
title_full Comparison of allogeneic stem cell transplantation and non-transplant approaches in elderly patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome: optimal statistical approaches and a critical appraisal of clinical results using non-randomized data.
title_fullStr Comparison of allogeneic stem cell transplantation and non-transplant approaches in elderly patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome: optimal statistical approaches and a critical appraisal of clinical results using non-randomized data.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of allogeneic stem cell transplantation and non-transplant approaches in elderly patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome: optimal statistical approaches and a critical appraisal of clinical results using non-randomized data.
title_short Comparison of allogeneic stem cell transplantation and non-transplant approaches in elderly patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome: optimal statistical approaches and a critical appraisal of clinical results using non-randomized data.
title_sort comparison of allogeneic stem cell transplantation and non transplant approaches in elderly patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome optimal statistical approaches and a critical appraisal of clinical results using non randomized data
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3792099?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ronaldbrand comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata
AT heinputter comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata
AT anjavanbiezen comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata
AT dietgerniederwieser comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata
AT rodrigomartino comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata
AT ghulammufti comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata
AT francescoonida comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata
AT argirissymeonidis comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata
AT christophschmid comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata
AT laurentgarderet comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata
AT marierobin comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata
AT michelvangelder comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata
AT jurgenfinke comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata
AT martinbornhauser comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata
AT guidokobbe comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata
AT ulrichgerming comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata
AT theodewitte comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata
AT nicolauskroger comparisonofallogeneicstemcelltransplantationandnontransplantapproachesinelderlypatientswithadvancedmyelodysplasticsyndromeoptimalstatisticalapproachesandacriticalappraisalofclinicalresultsusingnonrandomizeddata