Composite Tests under Corrupted Data

This paper focuses on test procedures under corrupted data. We assume that the observations Z i are mismeasured, due to the presence of measurement errors. Thus, instead of Z i for i = 1 , … , n, we observe X i = Z i + δ V i, with an unknown parame...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michel Broniatowski, Jana Jurečková, Ashok Kumar Moses, Emilie Miranda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-01-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/1/63
_version_ 1798024317258170368
author Michel Broniatowski
Jana Jurečková
Ashok Kumar Moses
Emilie Miranda
author_facet Michel Broniatowski
Jana Jurečková
Ashok Kumar Moses
Emilie Miranda
author_sort Michel Broniatowski
collection DOAJ
description This paper focuses on test procedures under corrupted data. We assume that the observations Z i are mismeasured, due to the presence of measurement errors. Thus, instead of Z i for i = 1 , … , n, we observe X i = Z i + δ V i, with an unknown parameter δ and an unobservable random variable V i. It is assumed that the random variables Z i are i.i.d., as are the X i and the V i. The test procedure aims at deciding between two simple hyptheses pertaining to the density of the variable Z i, namely f 0 and g 0. In this setting, the density of the V i is supposed to be known. The procedure which we propose aggregates likelihood ratios for a collection of values of δ. A new definition of least-favorable hypotheses for the aggregate family of tests is presented, and a relation with the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the sets f δ δ and g δ δ is presented. Finite-sample lower bounds for the power of these tests are presented, both through analytical inequalities and through simulation under the least-favorable hypotheses. Since no optimality holds for the aggregation of likelihood ratio tests, a similar procedure is proposed, replacing the individual likelihood ratio by some divergence based test statistics. It is shown and discussed that the resulting aggregated test may perform better than the aggregate likelihood ratio procedure.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T18:00:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e7f5aaaa96c47a78c98ead60f8bffae
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1099-4300
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T18:00:30Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Entropy
spelling doaj.art-0e7f5aaaa96c47a78c98ead60f8bffae2022-12-22T04:10:32ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002019-01-012116310.3390/e21010063e21010063Composite Tests under Corrupted DataMichel Broniatowski0Jana Jurečková1Ashok Kumar Moses2Emilie Miranda3Laboratoire de Probabilités, Statistique et Modélisation, Sorbonne Université, 75005 Paris, FranceInstitute of Information Theory and Automation, The Czech Academy of Sciences, 18208 Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of ECE, Indian Institute of Technology, Palakkad 560012, IndiaLaboratoire de Probabilités, Statistique et Modélisation, Sorbonne Université, 75005 Paris, FranceThis paper focuses on test procedures under corrupted data. We assume that the observations Z i are mismeasured, due to the presence of measurement errors. Thus, instead of Z i for i = 1 , … , n, we observe X i = Z i + δ V i, with an unknown parameter δ and an unobservable random variable V i. It is assumed that the random variables Z i are i.i.d., as are the X i and the V i. The test procedure aims at deciding between two simple hyptheses pertaining to the density of the variable Z i, namely f 0 and g 0. In this setting, the density of the V i is supposed to be known. The procedure which we propose aggregates likelihood ratios for a collection of values of δ. A new definition of least-favorable hypotheses for the aggregate family of tests is presented, and a relation with the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the sets f δ δ and g δ δ is presented. Finite-sample lower bounds for the power of these tests are presented, both through analytical inequalities and through simulation under the least-favorable hypotheses. Since no optimality holds for the aggregation of likelihood ratio tests, a similar procedure is proposed, replacing the individual likelihood ratio by some divergence based test statistics. It is shown and discussed that the resulting aggregated test may perform better than the aggregate likelihood ratio procedure.http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/1/63composite hypothesescorrupted dataleast-favorable hypothesesNeyman Pearson testdivergence based testingChernoff Stein lemma
spellingShingle Michel Broniatowski
Jana Jurečková
Ashok Kumar Moses
Emilie Miranda
Composite Tests under Corrupted Data
Entropy
composite hypotheses
corrupted data
least-favorable hypotheses
Neyman Pearson test
divergence based testing
Chernoff Stein lemma
title Composite Tests under Corrupted Data
title_full Composite Tests under Corrupted Data
title_fullStr Composite Tests under Corrupted Data
title_full_unstemmed Composite Tests under Corrupted Data
title_short Composite Tests under Corrupted Data
title_sort composite tests under corrupted data
topic composite hypotheses
corrupted data
least-favorable hypotheses
Neyman Pearson test
divergence based testing
Chernoff Stein lemma
url http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/1/63
work_keys_str_mv AT michelbroniatowski compositetestsundercorrupteddata
AT janajureckova compositetestsundercorrupteddata
AT ashokkumarmoses compositetestsundercorrupteddata
AT emiliemiranda compositetestsundercorrupteddata