Sulfur Cycling During Progressive Burial in Sulfate‐Rich Marine Carbonates
Abstract The isotopic composition of sulfate in the rock record has been frequently used to track the changes in the Earth's surface environments. By considering isotopic fractionation imparted by microbial sulfate reduction (MSR) and thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR), in this study, we ai...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009383 |
| _version_ | 1797637987831382016 |
|---|---|
| author | Lei Jiang Mojtaba Fakhraee Chunfang Cai Richard H. Worden |
| author_facet | Lei Jiang Mojtaba Fakhraee Chunfang Cai Richard H. Worden |
| author_sort | Lei Jiang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract The isotopic composition of sulfate in the rock record has been frequently used to track the changes in the Earth's surface environments. By considering isotopic fractionation imparted by microbial sulfate reduction (MSR) and thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR), in this study, we aim to develop a holistic understanding of the mixed effects of MSR and TSR on δ34S signals in sulfate‐rich carbonate systems. We report the occurrence of various types of sulfur‐bearing components from the Cambrian‐Ordovician carbonate system in the Tarim Basin, NW China, coupled with a well‐established diagenesis framework for these rocks. Our results indicate that most of the sulfur‐bearing species possess δ34S values slightly lower than both the source sulfate and the sulfide generated by TSR, yet these sulfur‐bearing species have substantially higher δ34S values than sulfide that resulted from MSR. Hence, a combination of sulfides sourced from MSR and TSR can adequately explain the sulfur isotope data in the studied interval. Building upon this hypothesis, we developed a new sulfur diagenesis model in order to quantify the accumulated H2S from the combined effects of MSR and TSR. Our new model can be used to explain the origin of sulfur‐bearing species in many other deep burial carbonate systems, including the Sichuan Basin, China, and the Gulf of Mexico, USA. We propose that greater attention should be paid to isotopic modulation through mixed diagenetic processes in order to gain a better mechanistic understanding of the primary geochemistry signals (e.g., δ34S) in marine carbonates. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T12:56:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0e8a023686924cb3bafb9943bcf42605 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1525-2027 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T12:56:10Z |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems |
| spelling | doaj.art-0e8a023686924cb3bafb9943bcf426052023-11-03T17:00:40ZengWileyGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems1525-20272020-12-012112n/an/a10.1029/2020GC009383Sulfur Cycling During Progressive Burial in Sulfate‐Rich Marine CarbonatesLei Jiang0Mojtaba Fakhraee1Chunfang Cai2Richard H. Worden3Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment Institute of Geology and Geophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing ChinaThe Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences Yale University New Haven Connecticut USAKey Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment Institute of Geology and Geophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing ChinaDepartment of Earth Ocean and Ecological Sciences, School of Environmental Sciences University of Liverpool Liverpool Merseyside UKAbstract The isotopic composition of sulfate in the rock record has been frequently used to track the changes in the Earth's surface environments. By considering isotopic fractionation imparted by microbial sulfate reduction (MSR) and thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR), in this study, we aim to develop a holistic understanding of the mixed effects of MSR and TSR on δ34S signals in sulfate‐rich carbonate systems. We report the occurrence of various types of sulfur‐bearing components from the Cambrian‐Ordovician carbonate system in the Tarim Basin, NW China, coupled with a well‐established diagenesis framework for these rocks. Our results indicate that most of the sulfur‐bearing species possess δ34S values slightly lower than both the source sulfate and the sulfide generated by TSR, yet these sulfur‐bearing species have substantially higher δ34S values than sulfide that resulted from MSR. Hence, a combination of sulfides sourced from MSR and TSR can adequately explain the sulfur isotope data in the studied interval. Building upon this hypothesis, we developed a new sulfur diagenesis model in order to quantify the accumulated H2S from the combined effects of MSR and TSR. Our new model can be used to explain the origin of sulfur‐bearing species in many other deep burial carbonate systems, including the Sichuan Basin, China, and the Gulf of Mexico, USA. We propose that greater attention should be paid to isotopic modulation through mixed diagenetic processes in order to gain a better mechanistic understanding of the primary geochemistry signals (e.g., δ34S) in marine carbonates.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC00938304540471048810513675carbonate |
| spellingShingle | Lei Jiang Mojtaba Fakhraee Chunfang Cai Richard H. Worden Sulfur Cycling During Progressive Burial in Sulfate‐Rich Marine Carbonates Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 0454 0471 0488 1051 3675 carbonate |
| title | Sulfur Cycling During Progressive Burial in Sulfate‐Rich Marine Carbonates |
| title_full | Sulfur Cycling During Progressive Burial in Sulfate‐Rich Marine Carbonates |
| title_fullStr | Sulfur Cycling During Progressive Burial in Sulfate‐Rich Marine Carbonates |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sulfur Cycling During Progressive Burial in Sulfate‐Rich Marine Carbonates |
| title_short | Sulfur Cycling During Progressive Burial in Sulfate‐Rich Marine Carbonates |
| title_sort | sulfur cycling during progressive burial in sulfate rich marine carbonates |
| topic | 0454 0471 0488 1051 3675 carbonate |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009383 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT leijiang sulfurcyclingduringprogressiveburialinsulfaterichmarinecarbonates AT mojtabafakhraee sulfurcyclingduringprogressiveburialinsulfaterichmarinecarbonates AT chunfangcai sulfurcyclingduringprogressiveburialinsulfaterichmarinecarbonates AT richardhworden sulfurcyclingduringprogressiveburialinsulfaterichmarinecarbonates |