Comparison of Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> Nanostructures for Photocatalytic Degradation of Volatile Organic Compounds

The photocatalytic degradation of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, toluene, and styrene are compared using monoclinic Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and anatase TiO<sub>2</sub> nanostructures under ultraviolet-C irradiation. These Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3&l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tae Hee Yoo, Heejoong Ryou, In Gyu Lee, Junsang Cho, Byung Jin Cho, Wan Sik Hwang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Catalysts
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/10/5/545
_version_ 1797568004002676736
author Tae Hee Yoo
Heejoong Ryou
In Gyu Lee
Junsang Cho
Byung Jin Cho
Wan Sik Hwang
author_facet Tae Hee Yoo
Heejoong Ryou
In Gyu Lee
Junsang Cho
Byung Jin Cho
Wan Sik Hwang
author_sort Tae Hee Yoo
collection DOAJ
description The photocatalytic degradation of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, toluene, and styrene are compared using monoclinic Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and anatase TiO<sub>2</sub> nanostructures under ultraviolet-C irradiation. These Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> photocatalysts are characterized using a field emission scanning electron microscope, a powder X-ray diffraction system, the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method, and a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer. The Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> shows a higher reaction rate constant (<i>k</i>, min<sup>−1</sup>) than TiO<sub>2</sub> by a factor of 7.1 for toluene, 8.1 for styrene, 3.1 for formaldehyde, and 2.0 for acetaldehyde. The results demonstrate that the photocatalytic activity ratio of the Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> over the TiO<sub>2</sub> becomes more prominent toward the aromatic compounds compared with the nonaromatic compounds. Highly energetic photo-generated carriers on the conduction/valence band-edge of the Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, in comparison with that of the TiO<sub>2</sub>, result in superior photocatalytic activity, in particular on aromatic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with a high bond dissociation energy.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T19:50:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e900194f5ac4a81a88d0172c08b6b83
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4344
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T19:50:13Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Catalysts
spelling doaj.art-0e900194f5ac4a81a88d0172c08b6b832023-11-20T00:24:09ZengMDPI AGCatalysts2073-43442020-05-0110554510.3390/catal10050545Comparison of Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> Nanostructures for Photocatalytic Degradation of Volatile Organic CompoundsTae Hee Yoo0Heejoong Ryou1In Gyu Lee2Junsang Cho3Byung Jin Cho4Wan Sik Hwang5Department of Materials Engineering, Korea Aerospace University, Goyang 10540, KoreaDepartment of Materials Engineering, Korea Aerospace University, Goyang 10540, KoreaDepartment of Materials Engineering, Korea Aerospace University, Goyang 10540, KoreaRadiation Laboratory, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USASchool of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology(KAIST), Daejeon 34141, KoreaDepartment of Materials Engineering, Korea Aerospace University, Goyang 10540, KoreaThe photocatalytic degradation of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, toluene, and styrene are compared using monoclinic Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and anatase TiO<sub>2</sub> nanostructures under ultraviolet-C irradiation. These Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> photocatalysts are characterized using a field emission scanning electron microscope, a powder X-ray diffraction system, the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method, and a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer. The Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> shows a higher reaction rate constant (<i>k</i>, min<sup>−1</sup>) than TiO<sub>2</sub> by a factor of 7.1 for toluene, 8.1 for styrene, 3.1 for formaldehyde, and 2.0 for acetaldehyde. The results demonstrate that the photocatalytic activity ratio of the Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> over the TiO<sub>2</sub> becomes more prominent toward the aromatic compounds compared with the nonaromatic compounds. Highly energetic photo-generated carriers on the conduction/valence band-edge of the Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, in comparison with that of the TiO<sub>2</sub>, result in superior photocatalytic activity, in particular on aromatic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with a high bond dissociation energy.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/10/5/545gallium oxidephotocatalytic degradationvolatile organic compoundsultraviolet lightaromatic compoundnonaromatic compound
spellingShingle Tae Hee Yoo
Heejoong Ryou
In Gyu Lee
Junsang Cho
Byung Jin Cho
Wan Sik Hwang
Comparison of Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> Nanostructures for Photocatalytic Degradation of Volatile Organic Compounds
Catalysts
gallium oxide
photocatalytic degradation
volatile organic compounds
ultraviolet light
aromatic compound
nonaromatic compound
title Comparison of Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> Nanostructures for Photocatalytic Degradation of Volatile Organic Compounds
title_full Comparison of Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> Nanostructures for Photocatalytic Degradation of Volatile Organic Compounds
title_fullStr Comparison of Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> Nanostructures for Photocatalytic Degradation of Volatile Organic Compounds
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> Nanostructures for Photocatalytic Degradation of Volatile Organic Compounds
title_short Comparison of Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> Nanostructures for Photocatalytic Degradation of Volatile Organic Compounds
title_sort comparison of ga sub 2 sub o sub 3 sub and tio sub 2 sub nanostructures for photocatalytic degradation of volatile organic compounds
topic gallium oxide
photocatalytic degradation
volatile organic compounds
ultraviolet light
aromatic compound
nonaromatic compound
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/10/5/545
work_keys_str_mv AT taeheeyoo comparisonofgasub2subosub3subandtiosub2subnanostructuresforphotocatalyticdegradationofvolatileorganiccompounds
AT heejoongryou comparisonofgasub2subosub3subandtiosub2subnanostructuresforphotocatalyticdegradationofvolatileorganiccompounds
AT ingyulee comparisonofgasub2subosub3subandtiosub2subnanostructuresforphotocatalyticdegradationofvolatileorganiccompounds
AT junsangcho comparisonofgasub2subosub3subandtiosub2subnanostructuresforphotocatalyticdegradationofvolatileorganiccompounds
AT byungjincho comparisonofgasub2subosub3subandtiosub2subnanostructuresforphotocatalyticdegradationofvolatileorganiccompounds
AT wansikhwang comparisonofgasub2subosub3subandtiosub2subnanostructuresforphotocatalyticdegradationofvolatileorganiccompounds