Added Value of Subtraction SPECT/CT in Dual-Isotope Parathyroid Scintigraphy

Background: Adding subtraction single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) to dual isotope (I-123 and Tc-99m-sestamibi) subtraction parathyroid scintigraphy is not widely implemented. We aimed to assess the added value of dual isotope subtraction SPECT/CT over single is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julie Wulf Christensen, Martin Krakauer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-08-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/10/9/639
_version_ 1797555372188237824
author Julie Wulf Christensen
Martin Krakauer
author_facet Julie Wulf Christensen
Martin Krakauer
author_sort Julie Wulf Christensen
collection DOAJ
description Background: Adding subtraction single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) to dual isotope (I-123 and Tc-99m-sestamibi) subtraction parathyroid scintigraphy is not widely implemented. We aimed to assess the added value of dual isotope subtraction SPECT/CT over single isotope SPECT/CT as an adjunct to dual isotope planar pinhole subtraction scintigraphy. Methods: Parathyroid scintigraphies from 106 patients with an estimated total of 415 parathyroid glands who (1) were diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism, (2) underwent dual isotope subtraction scintigraphy in the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gentofte Hospital, Denmark throughout 2017 and (3) underwent subsequent parathyroidectomy, were included. The original dual isotope planar pinhole subtraction plus dual isotope subtraction SPECT/CT (dual/dual method) exams were retrospectively re-evaluated using only Tc-99m-sestamibi SPECT/CT (dual/single method). Statistics were calculated per parathyroid. Surgical results confirmed by pathology served as reference standard. Results: The dual/dual method had higher sensitivity than the dual/single method (82% (95%CI 74%–88%) vs. 69% (95%CI 60%–77%)) while specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were similar (specificity 96% vs. 93%, PPV’s 87% vs. 82% and NPV’s 89% vs. 93%). Reader confidence was higher when employing the dual/dual method (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Conclusions: The dual/dual method can be considered superior to the dual/single method in the preoperative imaging in primary hyperparathyroidism.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T16:46:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e92a58303634afda05c67e1f845007c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4418
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T16:46:31Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj.art-0e92a58303634afda05c67e1f845007c2023-11-20T11:33:57ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182020-08-0110963910.3390/diagnostics10090639Added Value of Subtraction SPECT/CT in Dual-Isotope Parathyroid ScintigraphyJulie Wulf Christensen0Martin Krakauer1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, 2730 Herlev, DenmarkDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, 2730 Herlev, DenmarkBackground: Adding subtraction single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) to dual isotope (I-123 and Tc-99m-sestamibi) subtraction parathyroid scintigraphy is not widely implemented. We aimed to assess the added value of dual isotope subtraction SPECT/CT over single isotope SPECT/CT as an adjunct to dual isotope planar pinhole subtraction scintigraphy. Methods: Parathyroid scintigraphies from 106 patients with an estimated total of 415 parathyroid glands who (1) were diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism, (2) underwent dual isotope subtraction scintigraphy in the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gentofte Hospital, Denmark throughout 2017 and (3) underwent subsequent parathyroidectomy, were included. The original dual isotope planar pinhole subtraction plus dual isotope subtraction SPECT/CT (dual/dual method) exams were retrospectively re-evaluated using only Tc-99m-sestamibi SPECT/CT (dual/single method). Statistics were calculated per parathyroid. Surgical results confirmed by pathology served as reference standard. Results: The dual/dual method had higher sensitivity than the dual/single method (82% (95%CI 74%–88%) vs. 69% (95%CI 60%–77%)) while specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were similar (specificity 96% vs. 93%, PPV’s 87% vs. 82% and NPV’s 89% vs. 93%). Reader confidence was higher when employing the dual/dual method (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Conclusions: The dual/dual method can be considered superior to the dual/single method in the preoperative imaging in primary hyperparathyroidism.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/10/9/639primary hyperparathyroidismdual-isotope subtraction scintigraphydual-isotope subtraction SPECT/CTTc-99m-sestamibi SPECT/CT
spellingShingle Julie Wulf Christensen
Martin Krakauer
Added Value of Subtraction SPECT/CT in Dual-Isotope Parathyroid Scintigraphy
Diagnostics
primary hyperparathyroidism
dual-isotope subtraction scintigraphy
dual-isotope subtraction SPECT/CT
Tc-99m-sestamibi SPECT/CT
title Added Value of Subtraction SPECT/CT in Dual-Isotope Parathyroid Scintigraphy
title_full Added Value of Subtraction SPECT/CT in Dual-Isotope Parathyroid Scintigraphy
title_fullStr Added Value of Subtraction SPECT/CT in Dual-Isotope Parathyroid Scintigraphy
title_full_unstemmed Added Value of Subtraction SPECT/CT in Dual-Isotope Parathyroid Scintigraphy
title_short Added Value of Subtraction SPECT/CT in Dual-Isotope Parathyroid Scintigraphy
title_sort added value of subtraction spect ct in dual isotope parathyroid scintigraphy
topic primary hyperparathyroidism
dual-isotope subtraction scintigraphy
dual-isotope subtraction SPECT/CT
Tc-99m-sestamibi SPECT/CT
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/10/9/639
work_keys_str_mv AT juliewulfchristensen addedvalueofsubtractionspectctindualisotopeparathyroidscintigraphy
AT martinkrakauer addedvalueofsubtractionspectctindualisotopeparathyroidscintigraphy