Comparative Study of the Differences in Radiologic Results for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy and Microscopic or Micro-endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy

Objective Lumbar foraminal stenosis is a common pathology that causes back pain and radiculopathy. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (PELF) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure reported to be effective in the treatment of foraminal stenosis; however, no studies have been conducted th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hiroshi Taniwaki, Masahiro Morita, Hiroaki Nakamura
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Society 2022-10-01
Series:Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmisst.org/upload/pdf/jmisst-2022-00535.pdf
_version_ 1797951424041058304
author Hiroshi Taniwaki
Masahiro Morita
Hiroaki Nakamura
author_facet Hiroshi Taniwaki
Masahiro Morita
Hiroaki Nakamura
author_sort Hiroshi Taniwaki
collection DOAJ
description Objective Lumbar foraminal stenosis is a common pathology that causes back pain and radiculopathy. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (PELF) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure reported to be effective in the treatment of foraminal stenosis; however, no studies have been conducted that compare the on radiographic results of PELF and conventional techniques for the treatment of foraminal stenosis, such as microscopic foraminotomy and micro-endoscopic foraminotomy. This study aimed to report postoperative changes in the lumbar foraminal parameters on computed tomography (CT) after PELF and to compare the radiological efficacy of the PELF technique with that of the conventional techniques. Methods Radiographic evaluation of the neuroforamen was based on CT scans taken preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively in the PELF and conventional groups. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for back pain, visual analog scale (VAS), and JOA back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ) were evaluated preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively in the PELF group. Results The PELF and conventional groups comprised 21 and 17 patients, respectively. In the PELF group, the JOA score, VAS of back pain, and JOABPEQ of low back pain showed significant improvement. There were significant increases in the foraminal area, superior foraminal width (SFW), and middle foraminal width (MFW). Additional radiological evaluation for patients who underwent microscopic or micro-endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy was almost equivalent. Conclusion Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy is a minimally invasive technique that is as effective as conventional techniques for the treatment of foraminal stenosis.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T22:30:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0ea24fe32219423ba2591fc8637fca9a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2508-2043
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T22:30:23Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Korean Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Society
record_format Article
series Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique
spelling doaj.art-0ea24fe32219423ba2591fc8637fca9a2023-01-17T04:46:10ZengKorean Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery SocietyJournal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique2508-20432022-10-017221021610.21182/jmisst.2022.00535152Comparative Study of the Differences in Radiologic Results for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy and Microscopic or Micro-endoscopic Lumbar ForaminotomyHiroshi Taniwaki0Masahiro Morita1Hiroaki Nakamura2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Izumi City General Hospital, Izumi, Japan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Izumi City General Hospital, Izumi, Japan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, JapanObjective Lumbar foraminal stenosis is a common pathology that causes back pain and radiculopathy. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (PELF) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure reported to be effective in the treatment of foraminal stenosis; however, no studies have been conducted that compare the on radiographic results of PELF and conventional techniques for the treatment of foraminal stenosis, such as microscopic foraminotomy and micro-endoscopic foraminotomy. This study aimed to report postoperative changes in the lumbar foraminal parameters on computed tomography (CT) after PELF and to compare the radiological efficacy of the PELF technique with that of the conventional techniques. Methods Radiographic evaluation of the neuroforamen was based on CT scans taken preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively in the PELF and conventional groups. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for back pain, visual analog scale (VAS), and JOA back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ) were evaluated preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively in the PELF group. Results The PELF and conventional groups comprised 21 and 17 patients, respectively. In the PELF group, the JOA score, VAS of back pain, and JOABPEQ of low back pain showed significant improvement. There were significant increases in the foraminal area, superior foraminal width (SFW), and middle foraminal width (MFW). Additional radiological evaluation for patients who underwent microscopic or micro-endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy was almost equivalent. Conclusion Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy is a minimally invasive technique that is as effective as conventional techniques for the treatment of foraminal stenosis.http://www.jmisst.org/upload/pdf/jmisst-2022-00535.pdfpercutaneous endoscopyforaminotomyforaminal stenosis
spellingShingle Hiroshi Taniwaki
Masahiro Morita
Hiroaki Nakamura
Comparative Study of the Differences in Radiologic Results for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy and Microscopic or Micro-endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy
Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique
percutaneous endoscopy
foraminotomy
foraminal stenosis
title Comparative Study of the Differences in Radiologic Results for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy and Microscopic or Micro-endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy
title_full Comparative Study of the Differences in Radiologic Results for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy and Microscopic or Micro-endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy
title_fullStr Comparative Study of the Differences in Radiologic Results for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy and Microscopic or Micro-endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of the Differences in Radiologic Results for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy and Microscopic or Micro-endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy
title_short Comparative Study of the Differences in Radiologic Results for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy and Microscopic or Micro-endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy
title_sort comparative study of the differences in radiologic results for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy and microscopic or micro endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy
topic percutaneous endoscopy
foraminotomy
foraminal stenosis
url http://www.jmisst.org/upload/pdf/jmisst-2022-00535.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hiroshitaniwaki comparativestudyofthedifferencesinradiologicresultsforpercutaneousendoscopiclumbarforaminotomyandmicroscopicormicroendoscopiclumbarforaminotomy
AT masahiromorita comparativestudyofthedifferencesinradiologicresultsforpercutaneousendoscopiclumbarforaminotomyandmicroscopicormicroendoscopiclumbarforaminotomy
AT hiroakinakamura comparativestudyofthedifferencesinradiologicresultsforpercutaneousendoscopiclumbarforaminotomyandmicroscopicormicroendoscopiclumbarforaminotomy