| Summary: | Abstract We compared mandibular condyle positions as determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a mechanical device, the condylar position indicator (CPI). Both methods assessed 3 mandibular positions in 10 asymptomatic males and 10 asymptomatic females, aged 23 to 37 years, free from temporomandibular disorders: maximum intercuspation, bimanually manipulated centric relation, and the unguided neuromuscular position. Bite registrations were obtained for bimanual operator guidance and neuromuscular position. 3 T MRI scans of both temporomandibular joints produced 3D data of the most superior condylar points in all 3 mandibular positions. Using mounted plaster casts and the same bite registrations, an electronic CPI displayed 3D data of its condylar spheres in these positions. The results showed interclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.03 to 0.66 (95% confidence intervals from 0 to 0.8) and significantly different condyle positions between both methods (p = 0.0012, p < 0.001). The implications of the study emphasize that condyle position is unpredictable and variable. Its exact knowledge requires radiological imaging and should not rely on CPI assessments.
|
|---|