Triple negative breast cancer and platinum-based systemic treatment: a meta-analysis and systematic review
Abstract Background Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents 15–20% of breast cancers. Due to its heterogeneity and high rates of relapse, there is a need to optimize treatment efficacy. Platinum chemotherapy is still controversial and currently not recommended as first-line treatment for TNB...
Main Authors: | Jessa Gilda P. Pandy, Joanmarie C. Balolong-Garcia, Mel Valerie B. Cruz-Ordinario, Frances Victoria F. Que |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-11-01
|
Series: | BMC Cancer |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-019-6253-5 |
Similar Items
-
Platinum chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer
by: Sofia RE. Mason, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01) -
Current status and novel directions in triple negative breast cancer patients. Risk factors. Role of the platinum-based chemotherapy
by: Olivia IONESCU, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01) -
Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials
by: Kaigang Xie, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01) -
Neoadjuvant treatments in triple-negative breast cancer patients: where we are now and where we are going
by: Omarini C, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Efficacy of platinum-based and non-platinum-based drugs on triple-negative breast cancer: meta-analysis
by: Canling Lin, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01)