Paternal Care: Emperor Nicolas I in Gogol’s Fate

The essay for the first time highlights the history of a long-term attention and patronage that Еmperor Nicholas I as philanthropist, censor, and reader bestowed on Nikolay Gogol. It shows the increasing interest of the members of the tsar family to Gogol’s works starting with the Evenings on a Farm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Igor A. Vinogradov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2016-09-01
Series:Studia Litterarum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://old.studlit.ru/articles/Vinogradov.pdf
_version_ 1818823007691341824
author Igor A. Vinogradov
author_facet Igor A. Vinogradov
author_sort Igor A. Vinogradov
collection DOAJ
description The essay for the first time highlights the history of a long-term attention and patronage that Еmperor Nicholas I as philanthropist, censor, and reader bestowed on Nikolay Gogol. It shows the increasing interest of the members of the tsar family to Gogol’s works starting with the Evenings on a Farm near Dikanka; following the established rule, Gogol presented his just published works including Mirgorod, The Government Inspector, Dead Souls, collected works in four volumes, and Selected Passages from Correspondence with Friends to the Emperor and his family. The essay enumerates and highlights numerous cases of awards and financial aid given to Gogol by the Emperor and his family members in the 1830–1840s; Gogol’s appeal to the Emperor concerning the censorship of The Government Inspector; his intention to turn to the help of Nicholas I on the occasion of the censorship of Dead Souls and republication of Selected Passages from Correspondence with Friends; a request to the tsar to issue him a passport for his pilgrimage to the Holy Land; Gogol’s plans to get a position of the educator of the heir’s son, Grand Duke Nicholas Alexandrovich, at the end of his life. Particular emphasis is made on the fact that the “fatherly” attitude of the sovereign towards Gogol’s writings was not always incentive; for example, alongside some other contemporaries, the Emperor disapproved of the premiere of Gogol’s “Marriage.” In conclusion, the essay draws parallels between the censorial history of The Government Inspector and posthumous fate of Gogol’s works which Nicholas I, against the censor’s verdict, approved for publication shortly before his death.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T23:33:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0eabb25684584de3b85940c8ca708e71
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2500-4247
2541-8564
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T23:33:08Z
publishDate 2016-09-01
publisher A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences
record_format Article
series Studia Litterarum
spelling doaj.art-0eabb25684584de3b85940c8ca708e712022-12-21T20:47:37ZengA.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of SciencesStudia Litterarum2500-42472541-85642016-09-0111-226927710.22455/2500-4247-2016-1-1-2-269-277Paternal Care: Emperor Nicolas I in Gogol’s FateIgor A. Vinogradov 0A. M. Gorky Institute of the World Literature of the Russian Academy of SciencesThe essay for the first time highlights the history of a long-term attention and patronage that Еmperor Nicholas I as philanthropist, censor, and reader bestowed on Nikolay Gogol. It shows the increasing interest of the members of the tsar family to Gogol’s works starting with the Evenings on a Farm near Dikanka; following the established rule, Gogol presented his just published works including Mirgorod, The Government Inspector, Dead Souls, collected works in four volumes, and Selected Passages from Correspondence with Friends to the Emperor and his family. The essay enumerates and highlights numerous cases of awards and financial aid given to Gogol by the Emperor and his family members in the 1830–1840s; Gogol’s appeal to the Emperor concerning the censorship of The Government Inspector; his intention to turn to the help of Nicholas I on the occasion of the censorship of Dead Souls and republication of Selected Passages from Correspondence with Friends; a request to the tsar to issue him a passport for his pilgrimage to the Holy Land; Gogol’s plans to get a position of the educator of the heir’s son, Grand Duke Nicholas Alexandrovich, at the end of his life. Particular emphasis is made on the fact that the “fatherly” attitude of the sovereign towards Gogol’s writings was not always incentive; for example, alongside some other contemporaries, the Emperor disapproved of the premiere of Gogol’s “Marriage.” In conclusion, the essay draws parallels between the censorial history of The Government Inspector and posthumous fate of Gogol’s works which Nicholas I, against the censor’s verdict, approved for publication shortly before his death.http://old.studlit.ru/articles/Vinogradov.pdfGogolbiographyart creativitypublic ideologycensorshipinterpretationhermeneuticsspiritual heritage
spellingShingle Igor A. Vinogradov
Paternal Care: Emperor Nicolas I in Gogol’s Fate
Studia Litterarum
Gogol
biography
art creativity
public ideology
censorship
interpretation
hermeneutics
spiritual heritage
title Paternal Care: Emperor Nicolas I in Gogol’s Fate
title_full Paternal Care: Emperor Nicolas I in Gogol’s Fate
title_fullStr Paternal Care: Emperor Nicolas I in Gogol’s Fate
title_full_unstemmed Paternal Care: Emperor Nicolas I in Gogol’s Fate
title_short Paternal Care: Emperor Nicolas I in Gogol’s Fate
title_sort paternal care emperor nicolas i in gogol s fate
topic Gogol
biography
art creativity
public ideology
censorship
interpretation
hermeneutics
spiritual heritage
url http://old.studlit.ru/articles/Vinogradov.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT igoravinogradov paternalcareemperornicolasiingogolsfate