Bacillus‐based probiotic cleansers reduce the formation of dry biofilms on common hospital surfaces

Abstract In the absence of liquid suspension, dry biofilms can form upon hard surfaces within a hospital environment, representing a healthcare‐associated infection risk. Probiotic cleansers using generally recognized as safe organisms, such as those of the Bacillus genus, represent a potential stra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richard Wormald, Paul N. Humphreys, Christopher J. Charles, Simon P. Rout
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-12-01
Series:MicrobiologyOpen
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1391
_version_ 1797382756886380544
author Richard Wormald
Paul N. Humphreys
Christopher J. Charles
Simon P. Rout
author_facet Richard Wormald
Paul N. Humphreys
Christopher J. Charles
Simon P. Rout
author_sort Richard Wormald
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In the absence of liquid suspension, dry biofilms can form upon hard surfaces within a hospital environment, representing a healthcare‐associated infection risk. Probiotic cleansers using generally recognized as safe organisms, such as those of the Bacillus genus, represent a potential strategy for the reduction of dry biofilm bioburden. The mechanisms of action and efficacy of these cleaners are, however, poorly understood. To address this, a preventative dry biofilm assay was developed using steel, melamine, and ceramic surfaces to assess the ability of a commercially available Bacillus spp. based probiotic cleanser to reduce the surface bioburden of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Via this assay, phosphate‐buffered saline controls were able to generate dry biofilms within 7 days of incubation, with the application of the probiotic cleanser able to prevent >97.7% of dry biofilm formation across both pathogen analogs and surface types. Further to this, surfaces treated with the probiotic mixture alone also showed a reduction in dry biofilm across both pathogen and surface types. Confocal laser scanning microscopy imaging indicated that the probiotic bacteria were able to germinate and colonize surfaces, likely forming a protective layer upon these hard surfaces.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T21:10:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0eaca843817c4747a317d4a6e7f89004
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-8827
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T21:10:05Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series MicrobiologyOpen
spelling doaj.art-0eaca843817c4747a317d4a6e7f890042023-12-22T05:36:29ZengWileyMicrobiologyOpen2045-88272023-12-01126n/an/a10.1002/mbo3.1391Bacillus‐based probiotic cleansers reduce the formation of dry biofilms on common hospital surfacesRichard Wormald0Paul N. Humphreys1Christopher J. Charles2Simon P. Rout3Department of Biological and Geographical Sciences University of Huddersfield Huddersfield UKDepartment of Biological and Geographical Sciences University of Huddersfield Huddersfield UKGenesis Biosciences Cardiff UKDepartment of Biological and Geographical Sciences University of Huddersfield Huddersfield UKAbstract In the absence of liquid suspension, dry biofilms can form upon hard surfaces within a hospital environment, representing a healthcare‐associated infection risk. Probiotic cleansers using generally recognized as safe organisms, such as those of the Bacillus genus, represent a potential strategy for the reduction of dry biofilm bioburden. The mechanisms of action and efficacy of these cleaners are, however, poorly understood. To address this, a preventative dry biofilm assay was developed using steel, melamine, and ceramic surfaces to assess the ability of a commercially available Bacillus spp. based probiotic cleanser to reduce the surface bioburden of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Via this assay, phosphate‐buffered saline controls were able to generate dry biofilms within 7 days of incubation, with the application of the probiotic cleanser able to prevent >97.7% of dry biofilm formation across both pathogen analogs and surface types. Further to this, surfaces treated with the probiotic mixture alone also showed a reduction in dry biofilm across both pathogen and surface types. Confocal laser scanning microscopy imaging indicated that the probiotic bacteria were able to germinate and colonize surfaces, likely forming a protective layer upon these hard surfaces.https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1391BacillusbiofilmCLSM‐FISHprobioticsurface
spellingShingle Richard Wormald
Paul N. Humphreys
Christopher J. Charles
Simon P. Rout
Bacillus‐based probiotic cleansers reduce the formation of dry biofilms on common hospital surfaces
MicrobiologyOpen
Bacillus
biofilm
CLSM‐FISH
probiotic
surface
title Bacillus‐based probiotic cleansers reduce the formation of dry biofilms on common hospital surfaces
title_full Bacillus‐based probiotic cleansers reduce the formation of dry biofilms on common hospital surfaces
title_fullStr Bacillus‐based probiotic cleansers reduce the formation of dry biofilms on common hospital surfaces
title_full_unstemmed Bacillus‐based probiotic cleansers reduce the formation of dry biofilms on common hospital surfaces
title_short Bacillus‐based probiotic cleansers reduce the formation of dry biofilms on common hospital surfaces
title_sort bacillus based probiotic cleansers reduce the formation of dry biofilms on common hospital surfaces
topic Bacillus
biofilm
CLSM‐FISH
probiotic
surface
url https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1391
work_keys_str_mv AT richardwormald bacillusbasedprobioticcleansersreducetheformationofdrybiofilmsoncommonhospitalsurfaces
AT paulnhumphreys bacillusbasedprobioticcleansersreducetheformationofdrybiofilmsoncommonhospitalsurfaces
AT christopherjcharles bacillusbasedprobioticcleansersreducetheformationofdrybiofilmsoncommonhospitalsurfaces
AT simonprout bacillusbasedprobioticcleansersreducetheformationofdrybiofilmsoncommonhospitalsurfaces