Utilization of Smartphone Applications by Anesthesia Providers

Health care-related apps provide valuable facts and have added a new dimension to knowledge sharing. The purpose of this study is to understand the pattern of utilization of mobile apps specifically created for anesthesia providers. Smartphone app stores were searched, and a survey was sent to 416 a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael S. Green, Johann J. Mathew, Archana Gundigi Venkatesh, Parmis Green, Rayhan Tariq
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8694357
_version_ 1798045288546435072
author Michael S. Green
Johann J. Mathew
Archana Gundigi Venkatesh
Parmis Green
Rayhan Tariq
author_facet Michael S. Green
Johann J. Mathew
Archana Gundigi Venkatesh
Parmis Green
Rayhan Tariq
author_sort Michael S. Green
collection DOAJ
description Health care-related apps provide valuable facts and have added a new dimension to knowledge sharing. The purpose of this study is to understand the pattern of utilization of mobile apps specifically created for anesthesia providers. Smartphone app stores were searched, and a survey was sent to 416 anesthesia providers at 136 anesthesiology residency programs querying specific facets of application use. Among respondents, 11.4% never used, 12.4% used less than once per month, 6.0% used once per month, 12.1% used 2-3 times per month, 13.6% used once per week, 21% used 2-3 times per week, and 23.5% used daily. Dosage/pharmaceutical apps were rated the highest as most useful. 24.6% of the participants would pay less than $2.00, 25.1% would pay $5.00, 30.3% would pay $5–$10.00, 9.6% would pay $10–$25.00, 5.1% would pay $25–$50.00, and 5.1% would pay more than $50.00 if an app saves 5–10 minutes per day or 30 minutes/week. The use of mobile phone apps is not limited to reiterating information from textbooks but provides opportunities to further the ever-changing field of anesthesiology. Our survey illustrates the convenience of apps for health care professionals. Providers must exercise caution when selecting apps to ensure best evidence-based medicine.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T23:18:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0ed3b8e706ed4798affa6641f672963e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1687-6962
1687-6970
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T23:18:23Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Hindawi Limited
record_format Article
series Anesthesiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj.art-0ed3b8e706ed4798affa6641f672963e2022-12-22T03:57:32ZengHindawi LimitedAnesthesiology Research and Practice1687-69621687-69702018-01-01201810.1155/2018/86943578694357Utilization of Smartphone Applications by Anesthesia ProvidersMichael S. Green0Johann J. Mathew1Archana Gundigi Venkatesh2Parmis Green3Rayhan Tariq4Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, 245 N. 15th Street, Suite 7502, MS 310, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USADepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, 245 N. 15th Street, Suite 7502, MS 310, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USADepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, 245 N. 15th Street, Suite 7502, MS 310, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USADepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, 245 N. 15th Street, Suite 7502, MS 310, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USADepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, 245 N. 15th Street, Suite 7502, MS 310, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USAHealth care-related apps provide valuable facts and have added a new dimension to knowledge sharing. The purpose of this study is to understand the pattern of utilization of mobile apps specifically created for anesthesia providers. Smartphone app stores were searched, and a survey was sent to 416 anesthesia providers at 136 anesthesiology residency programs querying specific facets of application use. Among respondents, 11.4% never used, 12.4% used less than once per month, 6.0% used once per month, 12.1% used 2-3 times per month, 13.6% used once per week, 21% used 2-3 times per week, and 23.5% used daily. Dosage/pharmaceutical apps were rated the highest as most useful. 24.6% of the participants would pay less than $2.00, 25.1% would pay $5.00, 30.3% would pay $5–$10.00, 9.6% would pay $10–$25.00, 5.1% would pay $25–$50.00, and 5.1% would pay more than $50.00 if an app saves 5–10 minutes per day or 30 minutes/week. The use of mobile phone apps is not limited to reiterating information from textbooks but provides opportunities to further the ever-changing field of anesthesiology. Our survey illustrates the convenience of apps for health care professionals. Providers must exercise caution when selecting apps to ensure best evidence-based medicine.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8694357
spellingShingle Michael S. Green
Johann J. Mathew
Archana Gundigi Venkatesh
Parmis Green
Rayhan Tariq
Utilization of Smartphone Applications by Anesthesia Providers
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
title Utilization of Smartphone Applications by Anesthesia Providers
title_full Utilization of Smartphone Applications by Anesthesia Providers
title_fullStr Utilization of Smartphone Applications by Anesthesia Providers
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of Smartphone Applications by Anesthesia Providers
title_short Utilization of Smartphone Applications by Anesthesia Providers
title_sort utilization of smartphone applications by anesthesia providers
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8694357
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelsgreen utilizationofsmartphoneapplicationsbyanesthesiaproviders
AT johannjmathew utilizationofsmartphoneapplicationsbyanesthesiaproviders
AT archanagundigivenkatesh utilizationofsmartphoneapplicationsbyanesthesiaproviders
AT parmisgreen utilizationofsmartphoneapplicationsbyanesthesiaproviders
AT rayhantariq utilizationofsmartphoneapplicationsbyanesthesiaproviders