When and Why Contexts Predict Unethical Behavior: Evidence From a Laboratory Bribery Game

In economic unethical decision-making experiments, one important methodological investigation is what types of contexts should be used to frame the instructions. Within the experimental economics community, using neutral-context instructions instead of loaded-context instructions is the mainstream p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sining Wang, Tao Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675319/full
_version_ 1818586002386583552
author Sining Wang
Tao Chen
author_facet Sining Wang
Tao Chen
author_sort Sining Wang
collection DOAJ
description In economic unethical decision-making experiments, one important methodological investigation is what types of contexts should be used to frame the instructions. Within the experimental economics community, using neutral-context instructions instead of loaded-context instructions is the mainstream practice. Because the loaded contexts may impact behavior in an unpredictable manner and therefore, put experimental control at risk. Nevertheless, using the loaded-context instructions could be advantageous in several ways. A properly framed context can help to facilitate learning and gain ecological validity. The challenge is whether we can identify when and why the loaded context may alter behavior. In this paper, we aim to test if being familiar with a loaded context can systematically influence unethical decisions in a bribery game. We conduct a laboratory bribery game experiment with three different treatments: the neutral-context treatment, the familiar-context treatment, and the unfamiliar-context treatment. Using the neutral-context treatment as a benchmark, we find that participants in the familiar-context treatment express stronger negative attitudes toward corruption. Attitudes toward unethical behavior are the same in the neutral-context treatment and the unfamiliar-context treatment. Behaviorally, the participants in the familiar-context treatment are much less likely to engage in corrupt activities. The neutral-context treatment and the unfamiliar-context treatment produce the same behavioral outcome.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T08:46:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0ede0a6562ba47a2ba105bfacd1a8dd9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T08:46:02Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-0ede0a6562ba47a2ba105bfacd1a8dd92022-12-21T22:37:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-07-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.675319675319When and Why Contexts Predict Unethical Behavior: Evidence From a Laboratory Bribery GameSining Wang0Tao Chen1Department of Economics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United StatesBig Data Research Lab, Department of Economics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, CanadaIn economic unethical decision-making experiments, one important methodological investigation is what types of contexts should be used to frame the instructions. Within the experimental economics community, using neutral-context instructions instead of loaded-context instructions is the mainstream practice. Because the loaded contexts may impact behavior in an unpredictable manner and therefore, put experimental control at risk. Nevertheless, using the loaded-context instructions could be advantageous in several ways. A properly framed context can help to facilitate learning and gain ecological validity. The challenge is whether we can identify when and why the loaded context may alter behavior. In this paper, we aim to test if being familiar with a loaded context can systematically influence unethical decisions in a bribery game. We conduct a laboratory bribery game experiment with three different treatments: the neutral-context treatment, the familiar-context treatment, and the unfamiliar-context treatment. Using the neutral-context treatment as a benchmark, we find that participants in the familiar-context treatment express stronger negative attitudes toward corruption. Attitudes toward unethical behavior are the same in the neutral-context treatment and the unfamiliar-context treatment. Behaviorally, the participants in the familiar-context treatment are much less likely to engage in corrupt activities. The neutral-context treatment and the unfamiliar-context treatment produce the same behavioral outcome.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675319/fullunethical decisioncontext effectbribery gamecorruptionexperimental design
spellingShingle Sining Wang
Tao Chen
When and Why Contexts Predict Unethical Behavior: Evidence From a Laboratory Bribery Game
Frontiers in Psychology
unethical decision
context effect
bribery game
corruption
experimental design
title When and Why Contexts Predict Unethical Behavior: Evidence From a Laboratory Bribery Game
title_full When and Why Contexts Predict Unethical Behavior: Evidence From a Laboratory Bribery Game
title_fullStr When and Why Contexts Predict Unethical Behavior: Evidence From a Laboratory Bribery Game
title_full_unstemmed When and Why Contexts Predict Unethical Behavior: Evidence From a Laboratory Bribery Game
title_short When and Why Contexts Predict Unethical Behavior: Evidence From a Laboratory Bribery Game
title_sort when and why contexts predict unethical behavior evidence from a laboratory bribery game
topic unethical decision
context effect
bribery game
corruption
experimental design
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675319/full
work_keys_str_mv AT siningwang whenandwhycontextspredictunethicalbehaviorevidencefromalaboratorybriberygame
AT taochen whenandwhycontextspredictunethicalbehaviorevidencefromalaboratorybriberygame