The Role of Back Optic Zone Diameter in Myopia Control with Orthokeratology Lenses

We compared the efficacy of controlling the annual increase in axial length (AL) in myopic Caucasian children based on two parameters: the back optic zone diameter (BOZD) of the orthokeratology (OK) lens and plus power ring diameter (PPRD) or mid-peripheral annular ring of corneal steepening. Data f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaume Pauné, Silvia Fonts, Lina Rodríguez, Antonio Queirós
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/2/336
_version_ 1797410334352343040
author Jaume Pauné
Silvia Fonts
Lina Rodríguez
Antonio Queirós
author_facet Jaume Pauné
Silvia Fonts
Lina Rodríguez
Antonio Queirós
author_sort Jaume Pauné
collection DOAJ
description We compared the efficacy of controlling the annual increase in axial length (AL) in myopic Caucasian children based on two parameters: the back optic zone diameter (BOZD) of the orthokeratology (OK) lens and plus power ring diameter (PPRD) or mid-peripheral annular ring of corneal steepening. Data from 71 myopic patients (mean age, 13.34 ± 1.38 years; range, 10–15 years; 64% male) corrected with different BOZD OK lenses (DRL, Precilens) were collected retrospectively from a Spanish optometric clinic. The sample was divided into groups with BOZDs above or below 5.00 mm and the induced PPRD above or below 4.5 mm, and the relation to AL and refractive progression at 12 months was analyzed. Three subgroups were analyzed, i.e., plus power ring (PPR) inside, outside, or matching the pupil. The mean baseline myopia was −3.11 ± 1.46 D and the AL 24.65 ± 0.88 mm. Significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001) differences were found after 12 months of treatment in the refractive error and AL for the BOZD and PPRD. AL changes in subjects with smaller BOZDs decreased significantly regarding larger diameters (0.09 ± 0.12 and 0.15 ± 0.11 mm, respectively); in subjects with a horizontal sector of PPRD falling inside the pupil, the AL increased less (<i>p</i> = 0.035) than matching or outside the pupil groups by 0.04 ± 0.10 mm, 0.10 ± 0.11 mm, and 0.17 ± 0.12 mm, respectively. This means a 76% lesser AL growth or 0.13 mm/year in absolute reduction. OK corneal parameters can be modified by changing the OK lens designs, which affects myopia progression and AL elongation. Smaller BOZD induces a reduced PPRDs that slows AL elongation better than standard OK lenses. Further investigations should elucidate the effect of pupillary diameter, PPRD, and power change on myopia control.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T04:28:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0f09d10b52cd4479a46dbc5035c1817c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T04:28:25Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-0f09d10b52cd4479a46dbc5035c1817c2023-12-03T13:37:59ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-01-0110233610.3390/jcm10020336The Role of Back Optic Zone Diameter in Myopia Control with Orthokeratology LensesJaume Pauné0Silvia Fonts1Lina Rodríguez2Antonio Queirós3Centre Marsden de Terapia Visual, Consulta 156, Centro Medico Teknon, Vilana 12, 08022 Barcelona, SpainCentre Marsden de Terapia Visual, Consulta 156, Centro Medico Teknon, Vilana 12, 08022 Barcelona, SpainIntitute Visual Clinic Center, Pereira 660002, ColombiaClinical and Experimental Optometry Research Lab (CEORLab), Center of Physics, School of Science, University of Minho, Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, PortugalWe compared the efficacy of controlling the annual increase in axial length (AL) in myopic Caucasian children based on two parameters: the back optic zone diameter (BOZD) of the orthokeratology (OK) lens and plus power ring diameter (PPRD) or mid-peripheral annular ring of corneal steepening. Data from 71 myopic patients (mean age, 13.34 ± 1.38 years; range, 10–15 years; 64% male) corrected with different BOZD OK lenses (DRL, Precilens) were collected retrospectively from a Spanish optometric clinic. The sample was divided into groups with BOZDs above or below 5.00 mm and the induced PPRD above or below 4.5 mm, and the relation to AL and refractive progression at 12 months was analyzed. Three subgroups were analyzed, i.e., plus power ring (PPR) inside, outside, or matching the pupil. The mean baseline myopia was −3.11 ± 1.46 D and the AL 24.65 ± 0.88 mm. Significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001) differences were found after 12 months of treatment in the refractive error and AL for the BOZD and PPRD. AL changes in subjects with smaller BOZDs decreased significantly regarding larger diameters (0.09 ± 0.12 and 0.15 ± 0.11 mm, respectively); in subjects with a horizontal sector of PPRD falling inside the pupil, the AL increased less (<i>p</i> = 0.035) than matching or outside the pupil groups by 0.04 ± 0.10 mm, 0.10 ± 0.11 mm, and 0.17 ± 0.12 mm, respectively. This means a 76% lesser AL growth or 0.13 mm/year in absolute reduction. OK corneal parameters can be modified by changing the OK lens designs, which affects myopia progression and AL elongation. Smaller BOZD induces a reduced PPRDs that slows AL elongation better than standard OK lenses. Further investigations should elucidate the effect of pupillary diameter, PPRD, and power change on myopia control.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/2/336orthokeratologymyopia progressionoptic zone diameterpupillary diameteraxial length
spellingShingle Jaume Pauné
Silvia Fonts
Lina Rodríguez
Antonio Queirós
The Role of Back Optic Zone Diameter in Myopia Control with Orthokeratology Lenses
Journal of Clinical Medicine
orthokeratology
myopia progression
optic zone diameter
pupillary diameter
axial length
title The Role of Back Optic Zone Diameter in Myopia Control with Orthokeratology Lenses
title_full The Role of Back Optic Zone Diameter in Myopia Control with Orthokeratology Lenses
title_fullStr The Role of Back Optic Zone Diameter in Myopia Control with Orthokeratology Lenses
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Back Optic Zone Diameter in Myopia Control with Orthokeratology Lenses
title_short The Role of Back Optic Zone Diameter in Myopia Control with Orthokeratology Lenses
title_sort role of back optic zone diameter in myopia control with orthokeratology lenses
topic orthokeratology
myopia progression
optic zone diameter
pupillary diameter
axial length
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/2/336
work_keys_str_mv AT jaumepaune theroleofbackopticzonediameterinmyopiacontrolwithorthokeratologylenses
AT silviafonts theroleofbackopticzonediameterinmyopiacontrolwithorthokeratologylenses
AT linarodriguez theroleofbackopticzonediameterinmyopiacontrolwithorthokeratologylenses
AT antonioqueiros theroleofbackopticzonediameterinmyopiacontrolwithorthokeratologylenses
AT jaumepaune roleofbackopticzonediameterinmyopiacontrolwithorthokeratologylenses
AT silviafonts roleofbackopticzonediameterinmyopiacontrolwithorthokeratologylenses
AT linarodriguez roleofbackopticzonediameterinmyopiacontrolwithorthokeratologylenses
AT antonioqueiros roleofbackopticzonediameterinmyopiacontrolwithorthokeratologylenses