Decomposition of recalcitrant carbon under experimental warming in boreal forest.

Over the long term, soil carbon (C) storage is partly determined by decomposition rate of carbon that is slow to decompose (i.e., recalcitrant C). According to thermodynamic theory, decomposition rates of recalcitrant C might differ from those of non-recalcitrant C in their sensitivities to global w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adriana L Romero-Olivares, Steven D Allison, Kathleen K Treseder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0179674&type=printable
_version_ 1826578736758128640
author Adriana L Romero-Olivares
Steven D Allison
Kathleen K Treseder
author_facet Adriana L Romero-Olivares
Steven D Allison
Kathleen K Treseder
author_sort Adriana L Romero-Olivares
collection DOAJ
description Over the long term, soil carbon (C) storage is partly determined by decomposition rate of carbon that is slow to decompose (i.e., recalcitrant C). According to thermodynamic theory, decomposition rates of recalcitrant C might differ from those of non-recalcitrant C in their sensitivities to global warming. We decomposed leaf litter in a warming experiment in Alaskan boreal forest, and measured mass loss of recalcitrant C (lignin) vs. non-recalcitrant C (cellulose, hemicellulose, and sugars) throughout 16 months. We found that these C fractions responded differently to warming. Specifically, after one year of decomposition, the ratio of recalcitrant C to non-recalcitrant C remaining in litter declined in the warmed plots compared to control. Consistent with this pattern, potential activities of enzymes targeting recalcitrant C increased with warming, relative to those targeting non-recalcitrant C. Even so, mass loss of individual C fractions showed that non-recalcitrant C is preferentially decomposed under control conditions whereas recalcitrant C losses remain unchanged between control and warmed plots. Moreover, overall mass loss was greater under control conditions. Our results imply that direct warming effects, as well as indirect warming effects (e.g. drying), may serve to maintain decomposition rates of recalcitrant C compared to non-recalcitrant C despite negative effects on overall decomposition.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T03:51:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0f135110516d453183cbb64fb08867a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-14T14:07:08Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-0f135110516d453183cbb64fb08867a62025-02-27T05:38:44ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01126e017967410.1371/journal.pone.0179674Decomposition of recalcitrant carbon under experimental warming in boreal forest.Adriana L Romero-OlivaresSteven D AllisonKathleen K TresederOver the long term, soil carbon (C) storage is partly determined by decomposition rate of carbon that is slow to decompose (i.e., recalcitrant C). According to thermodynamic theory, decomposition rates of recalcitrant C might differ from those of non-recalcitrant C in their sensitivities to global warming. We decomposed leaf litter in a warming experiment in Alaskan boreal forest, and measured mass loss of recalcitrant C (lignin) vs. non-recalcitrant C (cellulose, hemicellulose, and sugars) throughout 16 months. We found that these C fractions responded differently to warming. Specifically, after one year of decomposition, the ratio of recalcitrant C to non-recalcitrant C remaining in litter declined in the warmed plots compared to control. Consistent with this pattern, potential activities of enzymes targeting recalcitrant C increased with warming, relative to those targeting non-recalcitrant C. Even so, mass loss of individual C fractions showed that non-recalcitrant C is preferentially decomposed under control conditions whereas recalcitrant C losses remain unchanged between control and warmed plots. Moreover, overall mass loss was greater under control conditions. Our results imply that direct warming effects, as well as indirect warming effects (e.g. drying), may serve to maintain decomposition rates of recalcitrant C compared to non-recalcitrant C despite negative effects on overall decomposition.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0179674&type=printable
spellingShingle Adriana L Romero-Olivares
Steven D Allison
Kathleen K Treseder
Decomposition of recalcitrant carbon under experimental warming in boreal forest.
PLoS ONE
title Decomposition of recalcitrant carbon under experimental warming in boreal forest.
title_full Decomposition of recalcitrant carbon under experimental warming in boreal forest.
title_fullStr Decomposition of recalcitrant carbon under experimental warming in boreal forest.
title_full_unstemmed Decomposition of recalcitrant carbon under experimental warming in boreal forest.
title_short Decomposition of recalcitrant carbon under experimental warming in boreal forest.
title_sort decomposition of recalcitrant carbon under experimental warming in boreal forest
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0179674&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT adrianalromeroolivares decompositionofrecalcitrantcarbonunderexperimentalwarminginborealforest
AT stevendallison decompositionofrecalcitrantcarbonunderexperimentalwarminginborealforest
AT kathleenktreseder decompositionofrecalcitrantcarbonunderexperimentalwarminginborealforest