Analyzing the curriculum of the faculty of medicine, University of Gezira using Harden’s 10 questions framework

Introduction: Despite the importance of curriculum analysis for internal refinement of a programme, the approach for such a step in under-described in the literature. This article describes the analysis of the medical curriculum at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Gezira (FMUG). This analy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: YASAR ALBUSHRA AHMED, SALMA ALNEEL
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2017-05-01
Series:Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jamp.sums.ac.ir/index.php/JAMP/article/view/726
_version_ 1818595967001165824
author YASAR ALBUSHRA AHMED
SALMA ALNEEL
author_facet YASAR ALBUSHRA AHMED
SALMA ALNEEL
author_sort YASAR ALBUSHRA AHMED
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Despite the importance of curriculum analysis for internal refinement of a programme, the approach for such a step in under-described in the literature. This article describes the analysis of the medical curriculum at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Gezira (FMUG). This analysis is crucial in the era of innovative medical education since introducing new curricula and curricular changes has become a common occurrence in medical education worldwide. Methods: The curriculum analysis was qualitatively approached using descriptive analysis and adopting Harden’s 10 Questions of curriculum development framework approach. Answering Harden’s questions reflects the fundamental curricular components and how the different aspects of a curriculum framework fit together. The key features highlighted in the curriculum-related material and literature have been presented. Results: The analysis of the curriculum of FMUG reveals a curriculum with interactive components. Clear structured objectives and goals reflect the faculty’s vision. The approach for needs assessment is based on a scientific ground, and the curriculum integrated contents have been set to meet national and international requirements. Adopting SPICES strategies helps FMUG and students achieve the objectives of the curriculum. Multiple motivated instructional methods are adopted, fostering coping with the programme objectives and outcomes. A wide range of assessment methods has been adopted to assess the learning outcomes of the curriculum correctly, reliably, and in alignment with the intended outcomes. The prevailing conducive educational environment of FMUG is favourable for its operation and profoundly influences the outcome of the programme. And there is a well-defined policy for curriculum management, monitoring and evaluation. Conclusion: Harden’s 10 questions are satisfactorily addressed by the multi-disciplinary and well-developed FMUG curriculum. The current curriculum supports the well-written faculty missions and educational objectives. It presents a structured, conceptual framework that supports the validity of the assumption behind the curriculum. The curriculum enhances intellectual and academic pursuits and supports social accountability.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T11:24:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0f13695d5ebb4337ac2952a8fef0415c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2322-2220
2322-3561
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T11:24:25Z
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism
spelling doaj.art-0f13695d5ebb4337ac2952a8fef0415c2022-12-21T22:33:24ZengShiraz University of Medical SciencesJournal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism2322-22202322-35612017-05-01526066Analyzing the curriculum of the faculty of medicine, University of Gezira using Harden’s 10 questions frameworkYASAR ALBUSHRA AHMED0SALMA ALNEEL1Department of Medical Oncology, Sligo University Hospital, Sligo, IrelandDepartment Of Paediatrics, Oasis Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaIntroduction: Despite the importance of curriculum analysis for internal refinement of a programme, the approach for such a step in under-described in the literature. This article describes the analysis of the medical curriculum at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Gezira (FMUG). This analysis is crucial in the era of innovative medical education since introducing new curricula and curricular changes has become a common occurrence in medical education worldwide. Methods: The curriculum analysis was qualitatively approached using descriptive analysis and adopting Harden’s 10 Questions of curriculum development framework approach. Answering Harden’s questions reflects the fundamental curricular components and how the different aspects of a curriculum framework fit together. The key features highlighted in the curriculum-related material and literature have been presented. Results: The analysis of the curriculum of FMUG reveals a curriculum with interactive components. Clear structured objectives and goals reflect the faculty’s vision. The approach for needs assessment is based on a scientific ground, and the curriculum integrated contents have been set to meet national and international requirements. Adopting SPICES strategies helps FMUG and students achieve the objectives of the curriculum. Multiple motivated instructional methods are adopted, fostering coping with the programme objectives and outcomes. A wide range of assessment methods has been adopted to assess the learning outcomes of the curriculum correctly, reliably, and in alignment with the intended outcomes. The prevailing conducive educational environment of FMUG is favourable for its operation and profoundly influences the outcome of the programme. And there is a well-defined policy for curriculum management, monitoring and evaluation. Conclusion: Harden’s 10 questions are satisfactorily addressed by the multi-disciplinary and well-developed FMUG curriculum. The current curriculum supports the well-written faculty missions and educational objectives. It presents a structured, conceptual framework that supports the validity of the assumption behind the curriculum. The curriculum enhances intellectual and academic pursuits and supports social accountability.http://jamp.sums.ac.ir/index.php/JAMP/article/view/726CurriculumEducationMedicalProblem-based learningProgram evaluation
spellingShingle YASAR ALBUSHRA AHMED
SALMA ALNEEL
Analyzing the curriculum of the faculty of medicine, University of Gezira using Harden’s 10 questions framework
Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism
Curriculum
Education
Medical
Problem-based learning
Program evaluation
title Analyzing the curriculum of the faculty of medicine, University of Gezira using Harden’s 10 questions framework
title_full Analyzing the curriculum of the faculty of medicine, University of Gezira using Harden’s 10 questions framework
title_fullStr Analyzing the curriculum of the faculty of medicine, University of Gezira using Harden’s 10 questions framework
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing the curriculum of the faculty of medicine, University of Gezira using Harden’s 10 questions framework
title_short Analyzing the curriculum of the faculty of medicine, University of Gezira using Harden’s 10 questions framework
title_sort analyzing the curriculum of the faculty of medicine university of gezira using harden s 10 questions framework
topic Curriculum
Education
Medical
Problem-based learning
Program evaluation
url http://jamp.sums.ac.ir/index.php/JAMP/article/view/726
work_keys_str_mv AT yasaralbushraahmed analyzingthecurriculumofthefacultyofmedicineuniversityofgezirausinghardens10questionsframework
AT salmaalneel analyzingthecurriculumofthefacultyofmedicineuniversityofgezirausinghardens10questionsframework