Why do people choose courts to resolve disputes? A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese citizens’ judicial reliance
We use the concept of judicial reliance to describe the willingness and extent to which citizens seek the help of the court in a dispute. There are obvious local differences in the degree of judicial reliance in different provinces, with some citizens more willing to resort to the courts to settle d...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015987/full |
_version_ | 1797960581510070272 |
---|---|
author | Xiang Wang Changwei Guo Yuwen Lyu Shouchao Zhu |
author_facet | Xiang Wang Changwei Guo Yuwen Lyu Shouchao Zhu |
author_sort | Xiang Wang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | We use the concept of judicial reliance to describe the willingness and extent to which citizens seek the help of the court in a dispute. There are obvious local differences in the degree of judicial reliance in different provinces, with some citizens more willing to resort to the courts to settle disputes, whereas others are indifferent to the courts. Based on the judicial survey data of 31 provinces in China, we use fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to explore the possible reasons for differences in citizens’ judicial reliance in China. We find that citizens’ judicial reliance is deeply influenced and restricted by five judicial conditions: transparency, corruption, independence, procedure, and professionalism. These causal conditions influence and interact with each other, thus forming six configurations that produce high judicial reliance. Among these six configurations, judicial professionalism is always the core condition. In recent years, China has indeed attached great importance to the construction of judicial professionalism, which not only optimizes the quality of the internal personnel of the court but also strengthens the public’s recognition of the court. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T00:47:29Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0f144ec94e9246aea8c5d7e98352c04e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1664-1078 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T00:47:29Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Psychology |
spelling | doaj.art-0f144ec94e9246aea8c5d7e98352c04e2023-01-05T12:57:10ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-01-011310.3389/fpsyg.2022.10159871015987Why do people choose courts to resolve disputes? A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese citizens’ judicial relianceXiang Wang0Changwei Guo1Yuwen Lyu2Shouchao Zhu3Zhou Enlai School of Government, Nankai University, Tianjin, ChinaBusiness School, Renmin University of China, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Marxism, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, ChinaLaw School, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, ChinaWe use the concept of judicial reliance to describe the willingness and extent to which citizens seek the help of the court in a dispute. There are obvious local differences in the degree of judicial reliance in different provinces, with some citizens more willing to resort to the courts to settle disputes, whereas others are indifferent to the courts. Based on the judicial survey data of 31 provinces in China, we use fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to explore the possible reasons for differences in citizens’ judicial reliance in China. We find that citizens’ judicial reliance is deeply influenced and restricted by five judicial conditions: transparency, corruption, independence, procedure, and professionalism. These causal conditions influence and interact with each other, thus forming six configurations that produce high judicial reliance. Among these six configurations, judicial professionalism is always the core condition. In recent years, China has indeed attached great importance to the construction of judicial professionalism, which not only optimizes the quality of the internal personnel of the court but also strengthens the public’s recognition of the court.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015987/fulljudicial reliancejudicial professionalismChinafuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)court |
spellingShingle | Xiang Wang Changwei Guo Yuwen Lyu Shouchao Zhu Why do people choose courts to resolve disputes? A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese citizens’ judicial reliance Frontiers in Psychology judicial reliance judicial professionalism China fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) court |
title | Why do people choose courts to resolve disputes? A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese citizens’ judicial reliance |
title_full | Why do people choose courts to resolve disputes? A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese citizens’ judicial reliance |
title_fullStr | Why do people choose courts to resolve disputes? A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese citizens’ judicial reliance |
title_full_unstemmed | Why do people choose courts to resolve disputes? A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese citizens’ judicial reliance |
title_short | Why do people choose courts to resolve disputes? A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese citizens’ judicial reliance |
title_sort | why do people choose courts to resolve disputes a fuzzy set analysis of chinese citizens judicial reliance |
topic | judicial reliance judicial professionalism China fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) court |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015987/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiangwang whydopeoplechoosecourtstoresolvedisputesafuzzysetanalysisofchinesecitizensjudicialreliance AT changweiguo whydopeoplechoosecourtstoresolvedisputesafuzzysetanalysisofchinesecitizensjudicialreliance AT yuwenlyu whydopeoplechoosecourtstoresolvedisputesafuzzysetanalysisofchinesecitizensjudicialreliance AT shouchaozhu whydopeoplechoosecourtstoresolvedisputesafuzzysetanalysisofchinesecitizensjudicialreliance |