Why do people choose courts to resolve disputes? A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese citizens’ judicial reliance

We use the concept of judicial reliance to describe the willingness and extent to which citizens seek the help of the court in a dispute. There are obvious local differences in the degree of judicial reliance in different provinces, with some citizens more willing to resort to the courts to settle d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiang Wang, Changwei Guo, Yuwen Lyu, Shouchao Zhu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015987/full
_version_ 1797960581510070272
author Xiang Wang
Changwei Guo
Yuwen Lyu
Shouchao Zhu
author_facet Xiang Wang
Changwei Guo
Yuwen Lyu
Shouchao Zhu
author_sort Xiang Wang
collection DOAJ
description We use the concept of judicial reliance to describe the willingness and extent to which citizens seek the help of the court in a dispute. There are obvious local differences in the degree of judicial reliance in different provinces, with some citizens more willing to resort to the courts to settle disputes, whereas others are indifferent to the courts. Based on the judicial survey data of 31 provinces in China, we use fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to explore the possible reasons for differences in citizens’ judicial reliance in China. We find that citizens’ judicial reliance is deeply influenced and restricted by five judicial conditions: transparency, corruption, independence, procedure, and professionalism. These causal conditions influence and interact with each other, thus forming six configurations that produce high judicial reliance. Among these six configurations, judicial professionalism is always the core condition. In recent years, China has indeed attached great importance to the construction of judicial professionalism, which not only optimizes the quality of the internal personnel of the court but also strengthens the public’s recognition of the court.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T00:47:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0f144ec94e9246aea8c5d7e98352c04e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T00:47:29Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-0f144ec94e9246aea8c5d7e98352c04e2023-01-05T12:57:10ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-01-011310.3389/fpsyg.2022.10159871015987Why do people choose courts to resolve disputes? A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese citizens’ judicial relianceXiang Wang0Changwei Guo1Yuwen Lyu2Shouchao Zhu3Zhou Enlai School of Government, Nankai University, Tianjin, ChinaBusiness School, Renmin University of China, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Marxism, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, ChinaLaw School, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, ChinaWe use the concept of judicial reliance to describe the willingness and extent to which citizens seek the help of the court in a dispute. There are obvious local differences in the degree of judicial reliance in different provinces, with some citizens more willing to resort to the courts to settle disputes, whereas others are indifferent to the courts. Based on the judicial survey data of 31 provinces in China, we use fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to explore the possible reasons for differences in citizens’ judicial reliance in China. We find that citizens’ judicial reliance is deeply influenced and restricted by five judicial conditions: transparency, corruption, independence, procedure, and professionalism. These causal conditions influence and interact with each other, thus forming six configurations that produce high judicial reliance. Among these six configurations, judicial professionalism is always the core condition. In recent years, China has indeed attached great importance to the construction of judicial professionalism, which not only optimizes the quality of the internal personnel of the court but also strengthens the public’s recognition of the court.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015987/fulljudicial reliancejudicial professionalismChinafuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)court
spellingShingle Xiang Wang
Changwei Guo
Yuwen Lyu
Shouchao Zhu
Why do people choose courts to resolve disputes? A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese citizens’ judicial reliance
Frontiers in Psychology
judicial reliance
judicial professionalism
China
fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)
court
title Why do people choose courts to resolve disputes? A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese citizens’ judicial reliance
title_full Why do people choose courts to resolve disputes? A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese citizens’ judicial reliance
title_fullStr Why do people choose courts to resolve disputes? A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese citizens’ judicial reliance
title_full_unstemmed Why do people choose courts to resolve disputes? A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese citizens’ judicial reliance
title_short Why do people choose courts to resolve disputes? A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese citizens’ judicial reliance
title_sort why do people choose courts to resolve disputes a fuzzy set analysis of chinese citizens judicial reliance
topic judicial reliance
judicial professionalism
China
fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)
court
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015987/full
work_keys_str_mv AT xiangwang whydopeoplechoosecourtstoresolvedisputesafuzzysetanalysisofchinesecitizensjudicialreliance
AT changweiguo whydopeoplechoosecourtstoresolvedisputesafuzzysetanalysisofchinesecitizensjudicialreliance
AT yuwenlyu whydopeoplechoosecourtstoresolvedisputesafuzzysetanalysisofchinesecitizensjudicialreliance
AT shouchaozhu whydopeoplechoosecourtstoresolvedisputesafuzzysetanalysisofchinesecitizensjudicialreliance