Which Way Forward for Marxist Value Theory? A Rejoinder to Moseley
<p class="first" id="d340197e88">Fred Moseley's reply to my review essay on his <i>Money and Totality</i> essentially repeats the argument that was criticized at length in that essay. It rests on a grave misinterpretation of my own...
Main Author: | David Laibman |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Pluto Journals
2018-09-01
|
Series: | World Review of Political Economy |
Online Access: | https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.9.3.0410 |
Similar Items
-
Moseley and the numbering of the elements /
by: Jaffe, Bernard, 1896-
Published: (1971) -
The publisher Humphrey Moseley and royalist literature, 1640-1660
by: Whitehead, N
Published: (2014) -
A Critique of Moseley's <i>Money and Totality</i>
by: Guido De Marco
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Which Way Forward: Marx's Theory or Sraffa's Theory? A Reply to Laibman
by: Fred Moseley
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Labor Productivity and Marxist Theory of Labor Value
by: Alejandro Valle Baeza, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)