Parthenogenetic vs. sexual reproduction in oribatid mite communities

Abstract The dominance of sex in Metazoa is enigmatic. Sexual species allocate resources to the production of males, while potentially facing negative effects such as the loss of well‐adapted genotypes due to recombination, and exposure to diseases and predators during mating. Two major hypotheses h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark Maraun, Tancredi Caruso, Jonathan Hense, Ricarda Lehmitz, Levan Mumladze, Maka Murvanidze, Ioana Nae, Julia Schulz, Anna Seniczak, Stefan Scheu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-06-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5303
_version_ 1818336814224637952
author Mark Maraun
Tancredi Caruso
Jonathan Hense
Ricarda Lehmitz
Levan Mumladze
Maka Murvanidze
Ioana Nae
Julia Schulz
Anna Seniczak
Stefan Scheu
author_facet Mark Maraun
Tancredi Caruso
Jonathan Hense
Ricarda Lehmitz
Levan Mumladze
Maka Murvanidze
Ioana Nae
Julia Schulz
Anna Seniczak
Stefan Scheu
author_sort Mark Maraun
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The dominance of sex in Metazoa is enigmatic. Sexual species allocate resources to the production of males, while potentially facing negative effects such as the loss of well‐adapted genotypes due to recombination, and exposure to diseases and predators during mating. Two major hypotheses have been put forward to explain the advantages of parthenogenetic versus sexual reproduction in animals, that is, the Red Queen hypothesis and the Tangled Bank/Structured Resource Theory of Sex. The Red Queen hypothesis assumes that antagonistic predator—prey/ parasite–host interactions favor sex. The Structured Resource Theory of Sex predicts sexual reproduction to be favored if resources are in short supply and aggregated in space. In soil, a remarkable number of invertebrates reproduce by parthenogenesis, and this pattern is most pronounced in oribatid mites (Oribatida, Acari). Oribatid mites are abundant in virtually any soil across very different habitats, and include many sexual and parthenogenetic (thelytokous) species. Thereby, they represent an ideal model group to investigate the role of sexual versus parthenogenetic reproduction across different ecosystems and habitats. Here, we compiled data on oribatid mite communities from different ecosystems and habitats across biomes, including tropical rainforests, temperate forests, grasslands, arable fields, salt marshes, bogs, caves, and deadwood. Based on the compiled dataset, we analyzed if the percentage of parthenogenetic species and the percentage of individuals of parthenogenetic species are related to total oribatid mite density, species number, and other potential driving factors of the reproductive mode including altitude and latitude. We then interpret the results in support of either the Red Queen hypothesis or the Structured Resource Theory of Sex. Overall, the data showed that high density of oribatid mites, indicating abundance of resources, is associated with high frequency of parthenogenesis supporting predictions of the Structured Resource Theory of Sex rather than the Red Queen hypothesis.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T14:45:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0f456d17965347d6b9090cba24530c73
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7758
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T14:45:18Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-0f456d17965347d6b9090cba24530c732022-12-21T23:41:29ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582019-06-019127324733210.1002/ece3.5303Parthenogenetic vs. sexual reproduction in oribatid mite communitiesMark Maraun0Tancredi Caruso1Jonathan Hense2Ricarda Lehmitz3Levan Mumladze4Maka Murvanidze5Ioana Nae6Julia Schulz7Anna Seniczak8Stefan Scheu9JFB Institute of Zoology and Anthropology Georg August University Göttingen Göttingen GermanySchool of Biological Sciences and Institute for Global Food Security Queen's University of Belfast Belfast Northern IrelandFachdidaktik Biologie, Nees‐Institut Rheinische Friedrich‐Wilhelms Universität Bonn Bonn GermanySenckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz Görlitz GermanyInstitute of Ecology and Institute of Zoology Ilia State University Tbilisi GeorgiaInstitute of Entomology of Agricultural University of Georgia Tbilisi GeorgiaEmil Racovita Institute of Speleology of Romanian Academy Bucharest RomaniaJFB Institute of Zoology and Anthropology Georg August University Göttingen Göttingen GermanyRealfagbygget University Museum of Bergen, University of Bergen Bergen NorwayJFB Institute of Zoology and Anthropology Georg August University Göttingen Göttingen GermanyAbstract The dominance of sex in Metazoa is enigmatic. Sexual species allocate resources to the production of males, while potentially facing negative effects such as the loss of well‐adapted genotypes due to recombination, and exposure to diseases and predators during mating. Two major hypotheses have been put forward to explain the advantages of parthenogenetic versus sexual reproduction in animals, that is, the Red Queen hypothesis and the Tangled Bank/Structured Resource Theory of Sex. The Red Queen hypothesis assumes that antagonistic predator—prey/ parasite–host interactions favor sex. The Structured Resource Theory of Sex predicts sexual reproduction to be favored if resources are in short supply and aggregated in space. In soil, a remarkable number of invertebrates reproduce by parthenogenesis, and this pattern is most pronounced in oribatid mites (Oribatida, Acari). Oribatid mites are abundant in virtually any soil across very different habitats, and include many sexual and parthenogenetic (thelytokous) species. Thereby, they represent an ideal model group to investigate the role of sexual versus parthenogenetic reproduction across different ecosystems and habitats. Here, we compiled data on oribatid mite communities from different ecosystems and habitats across biomes, including tropical rainforests, temperate forests, grasslands, arable fields, salt marshes, bogs, caves, and deadwood. Based on the compiled dataset, we analyzed if the percentage of parthenogenetic species and the percentage of individuals of parthenogenetic species are related to total oribatid mite density, species number, and other potential driving factors of the reproductive mode including altitude and latitude. We then interpret the results in support of either the Red Queen hypothesis or the Structured Resource Theory of Sex. Overall, the data showed that high density of oribatid mites, indicating abundance of resources, is associated with high frequency of parthenogenesis supporting predictions of the Structured Resource Theory of Sex rather than the Red Queen hypothesis.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5303oribatid mitesRed Queensexual reproductionStructured Resource Theory of SexTangled Bankthelytoky
spellingShingle Mark Maraun
Tancredi Caruso
Jonathan Hense
Ricarda Lehmitz
Levan Mumladze
Maka Murvanidze
Ioana Nae
Julia Schulz
Anna Seniczak
Stefan Scheu
Parthenogenetic vs. sexual reproduction in oribatid mite communities
Ecology and Evolution
oribatid mites
Red Queen
sexual reproduction
Structured Resource Theory of Sex
Tangled Bank
thelytoky
title Parthenogenetic vs. sexual reproduction in oribatid mite communities
title_full Parthenogenetic vs. sexual reproduction in oribatid mite communities
title_fullStr Parthenogenetic vs. sexual reproduction in oribatid mite communities
title_full_unstemmed Parthenogenetic vs. sexual reproduction in oribatid mite communities
title_short Parthenogenetic vs. sexual reproduction in oribatid mite communities
title_sort parthenogenetic vs sexual reproduction in oribatid mite communities
topic oribatid mites
Red Queen
sexual reproduction
Structured Resource Theory of Sex
Tangled Bank
thelytoky
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5303
work_keys_str_mv AT markmaraun parthenogeneticvssexualreproductioninoribatidmitecommunities
AT tancredicaruso parthenogeneticvssexualreproductioninoribatidmitecommunities
AT jonathanhense parthenogeneticvssexualreproductioninoribatidmitecommunities
AT ricardalehmitz parthenogeneticvssexualreproductioninoribatidmitecommunities
AT levanmumladze parthenogeneticvssexualreproductioninoribatidmitecommunities
AT makamurvanidze parthenogeneticvssexualreproductioninoribatidmitecommunities
AT ioananae parthenogeneticvssexualreproductioninoribatidmitecommunities
AT juliaschulz parthenogeneticvssexualreproductioninoribatidmitecommunities
AT annaseniczak parthenogeneticvssexualreproductioninoribatidmitecommunities
AT stefanscheu parthenogeneticvssexualreproductioninoribatidmitecommunities