A novel calibration approach of MODIS AOD data to predict PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations

Epidemiological studies investigating the human health effects of PM<sub>2.5</sub> are susceptible to exposure measurement errors, a form of bias in exposure estimates, since they rely on data from a limited number of PM<sub>2.5</sub> monitors within their study area. Satelli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Koutrakis, J. Schwartz, B. A. Coull, Y. Liu, H. J. Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2011-08-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/7991/2011/acp-11-7991-2011.pdf
Description
Summary:Epidemiological studies investigating the human health effects of PM<sub>2.5</sub> are susceptible to exposure measurement errors, a form of bias in exposure estimates, since they rely on data from a limited number of PM<sub>2.5</sub> monitors within their study area. Satellite data can be used to expand spatial coverage, potentially enhancing our ability to estimate location- or subject-specific exposures to PM<sub>2.5</sub>, but some have reported poor predictive power. A new methodology was developed to calibrate aerosol optical depth (AOD) data obtained from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). Subsequently, this method was used to predict ground daily PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations in the New England region. 2003 MODIS AOD data corresponding to the New England region were retrieved, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations measured at 26 US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) PM<sub>2.5</sub> monitoring sites were used to calibrate the AOD data. A mixed effects model which allows day-to-day variability in daily PM<sub>2.5</sub>-AOD relationships was used to predict location-specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels. PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations measured at the monitoring sites were compared to those predicted for the corresponding grid cells. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons between the observed and predicted concentrations suggested that the proposed new calibration approach renders MODIS AOD data a potentially useful predictor of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations. Furthermore, the estimated PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels within the study domain were examined in relation to air pollution sources. Our approach made it possible to investigate the spatial patterns of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations within the study domain.
ISSN:1680-7316
1680-7324