The Hungarian View of the Battle of Muhi (April 11, 1241): A New Interpretation of Historiographic Traditions

The victory of Batu’s army in 1241 has been regarded by both Hungarian and foreign historians as a textbook example of flawed preparation and a badly-fought battle. This is where we run into a question that historians constantly return to: whether the Hungarian defeat was due to the decline of the l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Szabó J.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: State Institution «Sh.Marjani Institute of History of Tatarstan Academy of Sciences» 2020-06-01
Series:Zolotoordynskoe Obozrenie
Subjects:
Online Access:http://goldhorde.ru/en/stati2020-2-2/
_version_ 1818917209280348160
author Szabó J.B.
author_facet Szabó J.B.
author_sort Szabó J.B.
collection DOAJ
description The victory of Batu’s army in 1241 has been regarded by both Hungarian and foreign historians as a textbook example of flawed preparation and a badly-fought battle. This is where we run into a question that historians constantly return to: whether the Hungarian defeat was due to the decline of the light cavalry and the one-sided western-style tactics, or possibly the weakness of the heavy cavalry. We know well enough from existing research, however, that the causes of the Hunga­rian defeat are not to be sought in the Hungarians’ tactical inflexibility. Indeed, a new interpretation of sources containing accounts of the battle reveals signs of attempts to adapt combat tactics to the circumstances. The execution of the tactics on each side, however, were decisively influenced by differences in military technology, morale and quality of leadership. The Mongol commanders were able to order their disciplined troops to carry on the struggle even after incurring serious losses from Hungarian charges, and in the later phase of the battle, they had rested units at their disposal, while the Hungarian knights started to ignore the commands and withdraw from the battle as their combat position deteriorated, and the deployable troops of the Hungarian army gradually dwindled. It was therefore primarily the Mongols’ discipline, experience and smoothly-running command system that put them ahead of the Hungarians, whose commanders lacked coordination and were not able to keep a firm grip on their troops. Consequently, when the position became critical, the potential for coherent action faded.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T00:30:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0f4fc1d534124131b5415ab7daffba1a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2308-152X
2313-6197
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T00:30:26Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher State Institution «Sh.Marjani Institute of History of Tatarstan Academy of Sciences»
record_format Article
series Zolotoordynskoe Obozrenie
spelling doaj.art-0f4fc1d534124131b5415ab7daffba1a2022-12-21T19:59:56ZengState Institution «Sh.Marjani Institute of History of Tatarstan Academy of Sciences»Zolotoordynskoe Obozrenie2308-152X2313-61972020-06-018224325710.22378/2313-6197.2020-8-2.243-257The Hungarian View of the Battle of Muhi (April 11, 1241): A New Interpretation of Historiographic TraditionsSzabó J.B.01 Budapest History Museum Budapest, Hungary 2 Research Centre for the Humanities Budapest, Hungary janos.bszabo2018@gmail.comThe victory of Batu’s army in 1241 has been regarded by both Hungarian and foreign historians as a textbook example of flawed preparation and a badly-fought battle. This is where we run into a question that historians constantly return to: whether the Hungarian defeat was due to the decline of the light cavalry and the one-sided western-style tactics, or possibly the weakness of the heavy cavalry. We know well enough from existing research, however, that the causes of the Hunga­rian defeat are not to be sought in the Hungarians’ tactical inflexibility. Indeed, a new interpretation of sources containing accounts of the battle reveals signs of attempts to adapt combat tactics to the circumstances. The execution of the tactics on each side, however, were decisively influenced by differences in military technology, morale and quality of leadership. The Mongol commanders were able to order their disciplined troops to carry on the struggle even after incurring serious losses from Hungarian charges, and in the later phase of the battle, they had rested units at their disposal, while the Hungarian knights started to ignore the commands and withdraw from the battle as their combat position deteriorated, and the deployable troops of the Hungarian army gradually dwindled. It was therefore primarily the Mongols’ discipline, experience and smoothly-running command system that put them ahead of the Hungarians, whose commanders lacked coordination and were not able to keep a firm grip on their troops. Consequently, when the position became critical, the potential for coherent action faded.http://goldhorde.ru/en/stati2020-2-2/mongol invasionmedieval hungarian kingdombattle of muhiwagon forteastern warfare
spellingShingle Szabó J.B.
The Hungarian View of the Battle of Muhi (April 11, 1241): A New Interpretation of Historiographic Traditions
Zolotoordynskoe Obozrenie
mongol invasion
medieval hungarian kingdom
battle of muhi
wagon fort
eastern warfare
title The Hungarian View of the Battle of Muhi (April 11, 1241): A New Interpretation of Historiographic Traditions
title_full The Hungarian View of the Battle of Muhi (April 11, 1241): A New Interpretation of Historiographic Traditions
title_fullStr The Hungarian View of the Battle of Muhi (April 11, 1241): A New Interpretation of Historiographic Traditions
title_full_unstemmed The Hungarian View of the Battle of Muhi (April 11, 1241): A New Interpretation of Historiographic Traditions
title_short The Hungarian View of the Battle of Muhi (April 11, 1241): A New Interpretation of Historiographic Traditions
title_sort hungarian view of the battle of muhi april 11 1241 a new interpretation of historiographic traditions
topic mongol invasion
medieval hungarian kingdom
battle of muhi
wagon fort
eastern warfare
url http://goldhorde.ru/en/stati2020-2-2/
work_keys_str_mv AT szabojb thehungarianviewofthebattleofmuhiapril111241anewinterpretationofhistoriographictraditions
AT szabojb hungarianviewofthebattleofmuhiapril111241anewinterpretationofhistoriographictraditions