Scientific Research or Advocacy? Emotive Labels and Selection Bias Confound Survey Results
Robert Costanza presents four compelling visions of the future, but the language he uses to describe them is emotive and value-laden and may bias the survey results. The descriptions and analogies used may evoke responses from the survey participants that reveal more about their reactions to the des...
Main Author: | Jerome K. Vanclay |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2000-07-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol4/iss1/resp8/ |
Similar Items
-
From “Patchy Endorsements” to Intentional Advocacy: Deconstructing Bias in the Language of Open Access
by: Lauren B. Collister, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
An evaluation of whether propensity score adjustment can remove the self-selection bias inherent to web panel surveys addressing sensitive health behaviours
by: Andrew Copas, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
Sensitivity analysis of selection bias: a graphical display by bias-correction index
by: Ping-Chen Chung, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01) -
Differential loss of participants does not necessarily cause selection bias
by: Kristie N. Carter, et al.
Published: (2012-06-01) -
Reason, Emotion and Solidarity in Humanitarian Advocacy
by: Arjun Claire
Published: (2021-07-01)