Assessment of Sea-Surface Wind Retrieval from C-Band Miniaturized SAR Imagery

Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has been widely used for observing sea-surface wind fields (SSWFs), with many scholars having evaluated the performance of SAR in SSWF retrieval. Due to the large systems and high costs of traditional SAR, a tendency towards the development of smaller and more cost-eff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yan Wang, Yan Li, Yanshuang Xie, Guomei Wei, Zhigang He, Xupu Geng, Shaoping Shang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-07-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/14/6313
_version_ 1797587491736256512
author Yan Wang
Yan Li
Yanshuang Xie
Guomei Wei
Zhigang He
Xupu Geng
Shaoping Shang
author_facet Yan Wang
Yan Li
Yanshuang Xie
Guomei Wei
Zhigang He
Xupu Geng
Shaoping Shang
author_sort Yan Wang
collection DOAJ
description Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has been widely used for observing sea-surface wind fields (SSWFs), with many scholars having evaluated the performance of SAR in SSWF retrieval. Due to the large systems and high costs of traditional SAR, a tendency towards the development of smaller and more cost-effective SAR systems has emerged. However, to date, there has been no evaluation of the SSWF retrieval performance of miniaturized SAR systems. This study utilized 1053 HiSea-1 and Chaohu-1 miniaturized SAR images covering the Southeast China Sea to retrieve SSWFs. After a quality control procedure, the retrieved winds were subsequently compared with ERA5, buoy, and ASCAT data. The retrieved wind speeds demonstrated root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 2.42 m/s, 1.64 m/s, and 3.29 m/s, respectively, while the mean bias errors (MBEs) were found to be −0.44 m/s, 1.08 m/s, and −1.65 m/s, respectively. Furthermore, the retrieved wind directions exhibited RMSEs of 11.5°, 36.8°, and 41.7°, with corresponding MBEs of −1.3°, 2.4°, and −8.8°, respectively. The results indicate that HiSea-1 and Chaohu-1 SAR satellites have the potential and practicality for SSWF retrieval, validating the technical indicators and performance requirements implemented during the satellites’ design phase.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T00:40:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0f550431bb0340609deb851873ad3b68
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T00:40:41Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-0f550431bb0340609deb851873ad3b682023-11-18T21:15:59ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202023-07-012314631310.3390/s23146313Assessment of Sea-Surface Wind Retrieval from C-Band Miniaturized SAR ImageryYan Wang0Yan Li1Yanshuang Xie2Guomei Wei3Zhigang He4Xupu Geng5Shaoping Shang6College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, ChinaDongshan Swire Marine Station, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, ChinaCollege of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, ChinaCollege of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, ChinaCollege of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, ChinaCollege of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, ChinaCollege of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, ChinaSynthetic aperture radar (SAR) has been widely used for observing sea-surface wind fields (SSWFs), with many scholars having evaluated the performance of SAR in SSWF retrieval. Due to the large systems and high costs of traditional SAR, a tendency towards the development of smaller and more cost-effective SAR systems has emerged. However, to date, there has been no evaluation of the SSWF retrieval performance of miniaturized SAR systems. This study utilized 1053 HiSea-1 and Chaohu-1 miniaturized SAR images covering the Southeast China Sea to retrieve SSWFs. After a quality control procedure, the retrieved winds were subsequently compared with ERA5, buoy, and ASCAT data. The retrieved wind speeds demonstrated root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 2.42 m/s, 1.64 m/s, and 3.29 m/s, respectively, while the mean bias errors (MBEs) were found to be −0.44 m/s, 1.08 m/s, and −1.65 m/s, respectively. Furthermore, the retrieved wind directions exhibited RMSEs of 11.5°, 36.8°, and 41.7°, with corresponding MBEs of −1.3°, 2.4°, and −8.8°, respectively. The results indicate that HiSea-1 and Chaohu-1 SAR satellites have the potential and practicality for SSWF retrieval, validating the technical indicators and performance requirements implemented during the satellites’ design phase.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/14/6313HiSea-1Chaohu-1windSAR
spellingShingle Yan Wang
Yan Li
Yanshuang Xie
Guomei Wei
Zhigang He
Xupu Geng
Shaoping Shang
Assessment of Sea-Surface Wind Retrieval from C-Band Miniaturized SAR Imagery
Sensors
HiSea-1
Chaohu-1
wind
SAR
title Assessment of Sea-Surface Wind Retrieval from C-Band Miniaturized SAR Imagery
title_full Assessment of Sea-Surface Wind Retrieval from C-Band Miniaturized SAR Imagery
title_fullStr Assessment of Sea-Surface Wind Retrieval from C-Band Miniaturized SAR Imagery
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Sea-Surface Wind Retrieval from C-Band Miniaturized SAR Imagery
title_short Assessment of Sea-Surface Wind Retrieval from C-Band Miniaturized SAR Imagery
title_sort assessment of sea surface wind retrieval from c band miniaturized sar imagery
topic HiSea-1
Chaohu-1
wind
SAR
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/14/6313
work_keys_str_mv AT yanwang assessmentofseasurfacewindretrievalfromcbandminiaturizedsarimagery
AT yanli assessmentofseasurfacewindretrievalfromcbandminiaturizedsarimagery
AT yanshuangxie assessmentofseasurfacewindretrievalfromcbandminiaturizedsarimagery
AT guomeiwei assessmentofseasurfacewindretrievalfromcbandminiaturizedsarimagery
AT zhiganghe assessmentofseasurfacewindretrievalfromcbandminiaturizedsarimagery
AT xupugeng assessmentofseasurfacewindretrievalfromcbandminiaturizedsarimagery
AT shaopingshang assessmentofseasurfacewindretrievalfromcbandminiaturizedsarimagery