Post anesthesia recovery rate evaluated by using White fast tracking scoring system
Introduction: Postponed recuperation from anesthesia can lead to different complications such as apnoea, aspiration of gastric content whit consequent development of aspiration pneumonia, laryngospasm, bradycardia, and hypoxia. Aim of this research was to determine infl uence of propofol, sevofluran...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Sarajevo
2013-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Health Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.jhsci.ba/ojs/index.php/jhsci/article/view/91 |
| _version_ | 1818569881485836288 |
|---|---|
| author | Munevera Hadžimešić Semir Imamović Mirsad Hodžić Vasvija Uljić Dželil Korkut Fatima Iljazagić Halilović Lejla Selimović Čeke Aida Pojskić |
| author_facet | Munevera Hadžimešić Semir Imamović Mirsad Hodžić Vasvija Uljić Dželil Korkut Fatima Iljazagić Halilović Lejla Selimović Čeke Aida Pojskić |
| author_sort | Munevera Hadžimešić |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction: Postponed recuperation from anesthesia can lead to different complications such as apnoea, aspiration of gastric content whit consequent development of aspiration pneumonia, laryngospasm, bradycardia, and hypoxia. Aim of this research was to determine infl uence of propofol, sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia on post anesthesia recovery rate.
Methods: This was a prospective study; it included 90 patients hospitalized in period form October 2011 to may 2012 year, all patients included in the study underwent lumbar microdiscectomy surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups: group 1: propofol maintained anesthesia, group 2: sevoflurane and group 3: isofl urane maintained anesthesia. Assessments of recovery rate were done 1, 5 and 10 minutes post extubation using White fast tracking scoring system.
Results: Significant difference was observed only 1 minute after extubation (p=0,025) finding recovery rate to be superior in propofol group. Propofol group compared to inhaled anesthesia with sevoflurane group, shows significantly faster recovery from anesthesia only one minute after extubation (p=0,046). In comparison of propofol group and isofl urane anesthesia group, statistical significance was noticed one minute following extubation (p=0,008). Comparison of propofol group and inhaled anesthesia groups recovery rates were not significantly different at all times measured. When we were comparing sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia, recovery rates shoved no signifi cant statistical difference.
Conclusions: Recovery rate evaluated by using White fast tracking scoring system was superior and with fewer complications in propofol maintained in comparison to sevoflurane and isoflurane maintained anesthesia only one minute post extubation, while after fifth and tenth minute difference was lost. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T06:53:30Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0f5e5a9131204ed08fdecfdc294d9036 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2232-7576 1986-8049 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T06:53:30Z |
| publishDate | 2013-12-01 |
| publisher | University of Sarajevo |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Health Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-0f5e5a9131204ed08fdecfdc294d90362022-12-21T23:12:49ZengUniversity of SarajevoJournal of Health Sciences2232-75761986-80492013-12-013310.17532/jhsci.2013.10693Post anesthesia recovery rate evaluated by using White fast tracking scoring systemMunevera Hadžimešić0Semir Imamović1Mirsad Hodžić2Vasvija Uljić3Dželil Korkut4Fatima Iljazagić Halilović5Lejla Selimović Čeke6Aida Pojskić7Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Trnovac bb, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and HerzegovinaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Trnovac bb, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and HerzegovinaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Trnovac bb, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Trnovac bb, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and HerzegovinaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Trnovac bb, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Trnovac bb, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and HerzegovinaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Trnovac bb, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and HerzegovinaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Trnovac bb, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and HerzegovinaIntroduction: Postponed recuperation from anesthesia can lead to different complications such as apnoea, aspiration of gastric content whit consequent development of aspiration pneumonia, laryngospasm, bradycardia, and hypoxia. Aim of this research was to determine infl uence of propofol, sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia on post anesthesia recovery rate. Methods: This was a prospective study; it included 90 patients hospitalized in period form October 2011 to may 2012 year, all patients included in the study underwent lumbar microdiscectomy surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups: group 1: propofol maintained anesthesia, group 2: sevoflurane and group 3: isofl urane maintained anesthesia. Assessments of recovery rate were done 1, 5 and 10 minutes post extubation using White fast tracking scoring system. Results: Significant difference was observed only 1 minute after extubation (p=0,025) finding recovery rate to be superior in propofol group. Propofol group compared to inhaled anesthesia with sevoflurane group, shows significantly faster recovery from anesthesia only one minute after extubation (p=0,046). In comparison of propofol group and isofl urane anesthesia group, statistical significance was noticed one minute following extubation (p=0,008). Comparison of propofol group and inhaled anesthesia groups recovery rates were not significantly different at all times measured. When we were comparing sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia, recovery rates shoved no signifi cant statistical difference. Conclusions: Recovery rate evaluated by using White fast tracking scoring system was superior and with fewer complications in propofol maintained in comparison to sevoflurane and isoflurane maintained anesthesia only one minute post extubation, while after fifth and tenth minute difference was lost.https://www.jhsci.ba/ojs/index.php/jhsci/article/view/91Post anesthesiarecoverypropofolsevofluraneisoflurane |
| spellingShingle | Munevera Hadžimešić Semir Imamović Mirsad Hodžić Vasvija Uljić Dželil Korkut Fatima Iljazagić Halilović Lejla Selimović Čeke Aida Pojskić Post anesthesia recovery rate evaluated by using White fast tracking scoring system Journal of Health Sciences Post anesthesia recovery propofol sevoflurane isoflurane |
| title | Post anesthesia recovery rate evaluated by using White fast tracking scoring system |
| title_full | Post anesthesia recovery rate evaluated by using White fast tracking scoring system |
| title_fullStr | Post anesthesia recovery rate evaluated by using White fast tracking scoring system |
| title_full_unstemmed | Post anesthesia recovery rate evaluated by using White fast tracking scoring system |
| title_short | Post anesthesia recovery rate evaluated by using White fast tracking scoring system |
| title_sort | post anesthesia recovery rate evaluated by using white fast tracking scoring system |
| topic | Post anesthesia recovery propofol sevoflurane isoflurane |
| url | https://www.jhsci.ba/ojs/index.php/jhsci/article/view/91 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT muneverahadzimesic postanesthesiarecoveryrateevaluatedbyusingwhitefasttrackingscoringsystem AT semirimamovic postanesthesiarecoveryrateevaluatedbyusingwhitefasttrackingscoringsystem AT mirsadhodzic postanesthesiarecoveryrateevaluatedbyusingwhitefasttrackingscoringsystem AT vasvijauljic postanesthesiarecoveryrateevaluatedbyusingwhitefasttrackingscoringsystem AT dzelilkorkut postanesthesiarecoveryrateevaluatedbyusingwhitefasttrackingscoringsystem AT fatimailjazagichalilovic postanesthesiarecoveryrateevaluatedbyusingwhitefasttrackingscoringsystem AT lejlaselimovicceke postanesthesiarecoveryrateevaluatedbyusingwhitefasttrackingscoringsystem AT aidapojskic postanesthesiarecoveryrateevaluatedbyusingwhitefasttrackingscoringsystem |