Indigenous peoples and marine protected area governance: A Mi’kmaq and Atlantic Canada case study

This research examines the potential challenges and opportunities for Mi’kmaq, the Indigenous peoples who have inhabited modern-day Nova Scotia and other areas of Eastern Canada for millennia, to play a greater role in marine protected area (MPA) governance in Canada. Given Canada’s marine conservat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Magena Warrior, Lucia Fanning, Anna Metaxas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2022-01-01
Series:FACETS
Subjects:
Online Access:https://facetsjournal.com/doi/10.1139/facets-2021-0128
_version_ 1798021757434593280
author Magena Warrior
Lucia Fanning
Anna Metaxas
author_facet Magena Warrior
Lucia Fanning
Anna Metaxas
author_sort Magena Warrior
collection DOAJ
description This research examines the potential challenges and opportunities for Mi’kmaq, the Indigenous peoples who have inhabited modern-day Nova Scotia and other areas of Eastern Canada for millennia, to play a greater role in marine protected area (MPA) governance in Canada. Given Canada’s marine conservation objectives of 30% by 2030, there is a growing need for decisions affecting the establishment of MPAs to respect Indigenous rights, values, and knowledge. Using the Eastern Shore Islands (ESI) in Nova Scotia, Canada, an area of interest for MPA establishment, as a case study, we conducted 17 semi-structured interviews with both Mi’kmaq and non-Mi’kmaq participants involved in the ESI consultation processes. We used content analysis to identify key themes that respondents perceived to be affecting Mi’kmaq involvement in the federal MPA governance processes. Barriers to overcome included those deemed to be systemic within the current decision-making processes; limited understanding of Mi’kmaq culture, governance, and rights; limited clarity of Mi’kmaq rights, particularly those resulting in fisheries conflicts; and limited capacity. Opportunities highlighted the importance of meaningful consultation and understanding of Indigenous worldviews as well as the need for alternative approaches to state-led/top-down governance to improve Mi’kmaq participation in MPA governance in Atlantic Canada.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T17:18:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0f65f4d9d6374977828a98410103190f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2371-1671
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T17:18:46Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
record_format Article
series FACETS
spelling doaj.art-0f65f4d9d6374977828a98410103190f2022-12-22T04:12:32ZengCanadian Science PublishingFACETS2371-16712022-01-0171298132710.1139/facets-2021-0128Indigenous peoples and marine protected area governance: A Mi’kmaq and Atlantic Canada case studyMagena Warrior0Lucia Fanning1Anna Metaxas2Marine Affairs Program, Dalhousie University, PO Box 15000, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, CanadaMarine Affairs Program, Dalhousie University, PO Box 15000, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, CanadaDepartment of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, PO Box 15000, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, CanadaThis research examines the potential challenges and opportunities for Mi’kmaq, the Indigenous peoples who have inhabited modern-day Nova Scotia and other areas of Eastern Canada for millennia, to play a greater role in marine protected area (MPA) governance in Canada. Given Canada’s marine conservation objectives of 30% by 2030, there is a growing need for decisions affecting the establishment of MPAs to respect Indigenous rights, values, and knowledge. Using the Eastern Shore Islands (ESI) in Nova Scotia, Canada, an area of interest for MPA establishment, as a case study, we conducted 17 semi-structured interviews with both Mi’kmaq and non-Mi’kmaq participants involved in the ESI consultation processes. We used content analysis to identify key themes that respondents perceived to be affecting Mi’kmaq involvement in the federal MPA governance processes. Barriers to overcome included those deemed to be systemic within the current decision-making processes; limited understanding of Mi’kmaq culture, governance, and rights; limited clarity of Mi’kmaq rights, particularly those resulting in fisheries conflicts; and limited capacity. Opportunities highlighted the importance of meaningful consultation and understanding of Indigenous worldviews as well as the need for alternative approaches to state-led/top-down governance to improve Mi’kmaq participation in MPA governance in Atlantic Canada.https://facetsjournal.com/doi/10.1139/facets-2021-0128marine protected areasTwo-Eyed SeeingIndigenous rightsMi’kmaq governanceAtlantic Canadamarine conservation
spellingShingle Magena Warrior
Lucia Fanning
Anna Metaxas
Indigenous peoples and marine protected area governance: A Mi’kmaq and Atlantic Canada case study
FACETS
marine protected areas
Two-Eyed Seeing
Indigenous rights
Mi’kmaq governance
Atlantic Canada
marine conservation
title Indigenous peoples and marine protected area governance: A Mi’kmaq and Atlantic Canada case study
title_full Indigenous peoples and marine protected area governance: A Mi’kmaq and Atlantic Canada case study
title_fullStr Indigenous peoples and marine protected area governance: A Mi’kmaq and Atlantic Canada case study
title_full_unstemmed Indigenous peoples and marine protected area governance: A Mi’kmaq and Atlantic Canada case study
title_short Indigenous peoples and marine protected area governance: A Mi’kmaq and Atlantic Canada case study
title_sort indigenous peoples and marine protected area governance a mi kmaq and atlantic canada case study
topic marine protected areas
Two-Eyed Seeing
Indigenous rights
Mi’kmaq governance
Atlantic Canada
marine conservation
url https://facetsjournal.com/doi/10.1139/facets-2021-0128
work_keys_str_mv AT magenawarrior indigenouspeoplesandmarineprotectedareagovernanceamikmaqandatlanticcanadacasestudy
AT luciafanning indigenouspeoplesandmarineprotectedareagovernanceamikmaqandatlanticcanadacasestudy
AT annametaxas indigenouspeoplesandmarineprotectedareagovernanceamikmaqandatlanticcanadacasestudy