Can digital technology promote sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence from urban China

AbstractIn the face of increasing global unsustainable risks such as poverty, hunger, and pollution. Building sustainable agriculture (SA) in the digital age is a fundamental task for human survival. Based on the coupled coordination perspective, this paper constructs an SA system that takes into ac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liqun Liu, Kai Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:Cogent Food & Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311932.2023.2282234
_version_ 1797301979546910720
author Liqun Liu
Kai Liu
author_facet Liqun Liu
Kai Liu
author_sort Liqun Liu
collection DOAJ
description AbstractIn the face of increasing global unsustainable risks such as poverty, hunger, and pollution. Building sustainable agriculture (SA) in the digital age is a fundamental task for human survival. Based on the coupled coordination perspective, this paper constructs an SA system that takes into account more stakeholders by considering poverty alleviation and income increase (PI), food security (FS), and green agriculture (GA) as subsystems. The impact of digital technology on SA is systematically analyzed through data from 276 prefecture-level and above cities in China from 2005 to 2020. The study shows that digital technology has a significant upgrading effect on SA and its subsystems. And digital technology is more likely to promote SA in the developed eastern region and peripheral cities. Moreover, agricultural productivity and labor productivity play a mediating mechanism in the process of digital technology for SA. Digital financial inclusion fuels the high input process of digital technology for incentivizing SA, PI, and GA, but it cannot affect the highly technical process of digital farming. Further research found that the incentives of digital technology for SA and GA are characterized by the nonlinear characteristic of increasing marginal effects. Due to the second digital divide, there is a U-shaped incentive process of digital technology for PI to fall and then rise. Finally, the spillover nature of digital technology leads to spatial spillovers in its contribution to SA development.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T23:30:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0f7c7cdb94fa43e487fb731b12446d18
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2331-1932
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T23:30:18Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Cogent Food & Agriculture
spelling doaj.art-0f7c7cdb94fa43e487fb731b12446d182024-02-20T15:14:24ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Food & Agriculture2331-19322023-12-019210.1080/23311932.2023.2282234Can digital technology promote sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence from urban ChinaLiqun Liu0Kai Liu1College of Economics and Management, Shihezi University, Shihezi, ChinaCollege of Economics and Management, Shihezi University, Shihezi, ChinaAbstractIn the face of increasing global unsustainable risks such as poverty, hunger, and pollution. Building sustainable agriculture (SA) in the digital age is a fundamental task for human survival. Based on the coupled coordination perspective, this paper constructs an SA system that takes into account more stakeholders by considering poverty alleviation and income increase (PI), food security (FS), and green agriculture (GA) as subsystems. The impact of digital technology on SA is systematically analyzed through data from 276 prefecture-level and above cities in China from 2005 to 2020. The study shows that digital technology has a significant upgrading effect on SA and its subsystems. And digital technology is more likely to promote SA in the developed eastern region and peripheral cities. Moreover, agricultural productivity and labor productivity play a mediating mechanism in the process of digital technology for SA. Digital financial inclusion fuels the high input process of digital technology for incentivizing SA, PI, and GA, but it cannot affect the highly technical process of digital farming. Further research found that the incentives of digital technology for SA and GA are characterized by the nonlinear characteristic of increasing marginal effects. Due to the second digital divide, there is a U-shaped incentive process of digital technology for PI to fall and then rise. Finally, the spillover nature of digital technology leads to spatial spillovers in its contribution to SA development.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311932.2023.2282234digital technologysustainable agriculturepoverty alleviation and income increasefood securitygreen agriculture
spellingShingle Liqun Liu
Kai Liu
Can digital technology promote sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence from urban China
Cogent Food & Agriculture
digital technology
sustainable agriculture
poverty alleviation and income increase
food security
green agriculture
title Can digital technology promote sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence from urban China
title_full Can digital technology promote sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence from urban China
title_fullStr Can digital technology promote sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence from urban China
title_full_unstemmed Can digital technology promote sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence from urban China
title_short Can digital technology promote sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence from urban China
title_sort can digital technology promote sustainable agriculture empirical evidence from urban china
topic digital technology
sustainable agriculture
poverty alleviation and income increase
food security
green agriculture
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311932.2023.2282234
work_keys_str_mv AT liqunliu candigitaltechnologypromotesustainableagricultureempiricalevidencefromurbanchina
AT kailiu candigitaltechnologypromotesustainableagricultureempiricalevidencefromurbanchina