A Wearable Magneto-Inertial System for Gait Analysis (H-Gait): Validation on Normal Weight and Overweight/Obese Young Healthy Adults
Background: Wearable magneto-inertial sensors are being increasingly used to obtain human motion measurements out of the lab, although their performance in applications requiring high accuracy, such as gait analysis, are still a subject of debate. The aim of this work was to validate a gait analysis...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2017-10-01
|
| Series: | Sensors |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/17/10/2406 |
| _version_ | 1828353278934515712 |
|---|---|
| author | Valentina Agostini Laura Gastaldi Valeria Rosso Marco Knaflitz Shigeru Tadano |
| author_facet | Valentina Agostini Laura Gastaldi Valeria Rosso Marco Knaflitz Shigeru Tadano |
| author_sort | Valentina Agostini |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Wearable magneto-inertial sensors are being increasingly used to obtain human motion measurements out of the lab, although their performance in applications requiring high accuracy, such as gait analysis, are still a subject of debate. The aim of this work was to validate a gait analysis system (H-Gait) based on magneto-inertial sensors, both in normal weight (NW) and overweight/obese (OW) subjects. The validation is performed against a reference multichannel recording system (STEP32), providing direct measurements of gait timings (through foot-switches) and joint angles in the sagittal plane (through electrogoniometers). Methods: Twenty-two young male subjects were recruited for the study (12 NW, 10 OW). After positioning body-fixed sensors of both systems, each subject was asked to walk, at a self-selected speed, over a 14-m straight path for 12 trials. Gait signals were recorded, at the same time, with the two systems. Spatio-temporal parameters, ankle, knee, and hip joint kinematics were extracted analyzing an average of 89 ± 13 gait cycles from each lower limb. Intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altmann plots were used to compare H-Gait and STEP32 measurements. Changes in gait parameters and joint kinematics of OW with respect NW were also evaluated. Results: The two systems were highly consistent for cadence, while a lower agreement was found for the other spatio-temporal parameters. Ankle and knee joint kinematics is overall comparable. Joint ROMs values were slightly lower for H-Gait with respect to STEP32 for the ankle (by 1.9° for NW, and 1.6° for OW) and for the knee (by 4.1° for NW, and 1.8° for OW). More evident differences were found for hip joint, with ROMs values higher for H-Gait (by 6.8° for NW, and 9.5° for OW). NW and OW showed significant differences considering STEP32 (p = 0.0004), but not H-Gait (p = 0.06). In particular, overweight/obese subjects showed a higher cadence (55.0 vs. 52.3 strides/min) and a lower hip ROM (23.0° vs. 27.3°) than normal weight subjects. Conclusions: The two systems can be considered interchangeable for what concerns joint kinematics, except for the hip, where discrepancies were evidenced. Differences between normal and overweight/obese subjects were statistically significant using STEP32. The same tendency was observed using H-Gait. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-14T02:05:24Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0f8e95e38d8f4672a447d113e4c6ef4e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1424-8220 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-14T02:05:24Z |
| publishDate | 2017-10-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Sensors |
| spelling | doaj.art-0f8e95e38d8f4672a447d113e4c6ef4e2022-12-22T02:18:41ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202017-10-011710240610.3390/s17102406s17102406A Wearable Magneto-Inertial System for Gait Analysis (H-Gait): Validation on Normal Weight and Overweight/Obese Young Healthy AdultsValentina Agostini0Laura Gastaldi1Valeria Rosso2Marco Knaflitz3Shigeru Tadano4Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, ItalyDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Italy, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, ItalyDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Italy, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, ItalyDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, ItalyDivision of Human Mechanical Systems and Design, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8628, JapanBackground: Wearable magneto-inertial sensors are being increasingly used to obtain human motion measurements out of the lab, although their performance in applications requiring high accuracy, such as gait analysis, are still a subject of debate. The aim of this work was to validate a gait analysis system (H-Gait) based on magneto-inertial sensors, both in normal weight (NW) and overweight/obese (OW) subjects. The validation is performed against a reference multichannel recording system (STEP32), providing direct measurements of gait timings (through foot-switches) and joint angles in the sagittal plane (through electrogoniometers). Methods: Twenty-two young male subjects were recruited for the study (12 NW, 10 OW). After positioning body-fixed sensors of both systems, each subject was asked to walk, at a self-selected speed, over a 14-m straight path for 12 trials. Gait signals were recorded, at the same time, with the two systems. Spatio-temporal parameters, ankle, knee, and hip joint kinematics were extracted analyzing an average of 89 ± 13 gait cycles from each lower limb. Intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altmann plots were used to compare H-Gait and STEP32 measurements. Changes in gait parameters and joint kinematics of OW with respect NW were also evaluated. Results: The two systems were highly consistent for cadence, while a lower agreement was found for the other spatio-temporal parameters. Ankle and knee joint kinematics is overall comparable. Joint ROMs values were slightly lower for H-Gait with respect to STEP32 for the ankle (by 1.9° for NW, and 1.6° for OW) and for the knee (by 4.1° for NW, and 1.8° for OW). More evident differences were found for hip joint, with ROMs values higher for H-Gait (by 6.8° for NW, and 9.5° for OW). NW and OW showed significant differences considering STEP32 (p = 0.0004), but not H-Gait (p = 0.06). In particular, overweight/obese subjects showed a higher cadence (55.0 vs. 52.3 strides/min) and a lower hip ROM (23.0° vs. 27.3°) than normal weight subjects. Conclusions: The two systems can be considered interchangeable for what concerns joint kinematics, except for the hip, where discrepancies were evidenced. Differences between normal and overweight/obese subjects were statistically significant using STEP32. The same tendency was observed using H-Gait.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/17/10/2406gait analysiswearableSTEP32H-Gaitmagneto-inertial sensorsspatio-temporal parametersjoint kinematicsyoungoverweightobese |
| spellingShingle | Valentina Agostini Laura Gastaldi Valeria Rosso Marco Knaflitz Shigeru Tadano A Wearable Magneto-Inertial System for Gait Analysis (H-Gait): Validation on Normal Weight and Overweight/Obese Young Healthy Adults Sensors gait analysis wearable STEP32 H-Gait magneto-inertial sensors spatio-temporal parameters joint kinematics young overweight obese |
| title | A Wearable Magneto-Inertial System for Gait Analysis (H-Gait): Validation on Normal Weight and Overweight/Obese Young Healthy Adults |
| title_full | A Wearable Magneto-Inertial System for Gait Analysis (H-Gait): Validation on Normal Weight and Overweight/Obese Young Healthy Adults |
| title_fullStr | A Wearable Magneto-Inertial System for Gait Analysis (H-Gait): Validation on Normal Weight and Overweight/Obese Young Healthy Adults |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Wearable Magneto-Inertial System for Gait Analysis (H-Gait): Validation on Normal Weight and Overweight/Obese Young Healthy Adults |
| title_short | A Wearable Magneto-Inertial System for Gait Analysis (H-Gait): Validation on Normal Weight and Overweight/Obese Young Healthy Adults |
| title_sort | wearable magneto inertial system for gait analysis h gait validation on normal weight and overweight obese young healthy adults |
| topic | gait analysis wearable STEP32 H-Gait magneto-inertial sensors spatio-temporal parameters joint kinematics young overweight obese |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/17/10/2406 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT valentinaagostini awearablemagnetoinertialsystemforgaitanalysishgaitvalidationonnormalweightandoverweightobeseyounghealthyadults AT lauragastaldi awearablemagnetoinertialsystemforgaitanalysishgaitvalidationonnormalweightandoverweightobeseyounghealthyadults AT valeriarosso awearablemagnetoinertialsystemforgaitanalysishgaitvalidationonnormalweightandoverweightobeseyounghealthyadults AT marcoknaflitz awearablemagnetoinertialsystemforgaitanalysishgaitvalidationonnormalweightandoverweightobeseyounghealthyadults AT shigerutadano awearablemagnetoinertialsystemforgaitanalysishgaitvalidationonnormalweightandoverweightobeseyounghealthyadults AT valentinaagostini wearablemagnetoinertialsystemforgaitanalysishgaitvalidationonnormalweightandoverweightobeseyounghealthyadults AT lauragastaldi wearablemagnetoinertialsystemforgaitanalysishgaitvalidationonnormalweightandoverweightobeseyounghealthyadults AT valeriarosso wearablemagnetoinertialsystemforgaitanalysishgaitvalidationonnormalweightandoverweightobeseyounghealthyadults AT marcoknaflitz wearablemagnetoinertialsystemforgaitanalysishgaitvalidationonnormalweightandoverweightobeseyounghealthyadults AT shigerutadano wearablemagnetoinertialsystemforgaitanalysishgaitvalidationonnormalweightandoverweightobeseyounghealthyadults |