Motive, desire, drive: the discourse of force

A review of the original paper on motive by Blum and McHugh (1971) is used as an occasion to make transparent an approach to social theory as it has developed over the years in their work. This method, in treating motive as an illustration, engages it as an example of the status of the signifier as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alan Blum
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bucharest 2013-12-01
Series:Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://compaso.eu/wpd/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Motives_Compaso2013-42-Blum.pdf
_version_ 1818137171716997120
author Alan Blum
author_facet Alan Blum
author_sort Alan Blum
collection DOAJ
description A review of the original paper on motive by Blum and McHugh (1971) is used as an occasion to make transparent an approach to social theory as it has developed over the years in their work. This method, in treating motive as an illustration, engages it as an example of the status of the signifier as a symptom of interpretive conflict endemic to any situation of action, always inviting an analysis of the symbolic order and imaginative structure that sustains the distinction as a force in social life. In this paper, motive in particular is unpacked to show how it serves as an indication of fundamental ambiguity with respect to a problem-solving situation, revealing in this case constant perplexity in relation to the enigmatic character of what comes to view on any occasion and the recurrent contestation that is released.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T09:52:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0f91cfbcaa2d475eb5faada394ac25f7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2068-0317
2068-0317
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T09:52:04Z
publishDate 2013-12-01
publisher University of Bucharest
record_format Article
series Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology
spelling doaj.art-0f91cfbcaa2d475eb5faada394ac25f72022-12-22T01:12:23ZengUniversity of BucharestJournal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology2068-03172068-03172013-12-0142519Motive, desire, drive: the discourse of forceAlan Blum0York University, Canada, Executive Director, Culture of Cities CentreA review of the original paper on motive by Blum and McHugh (1971) is used as an occasion to make transparent an approach to social theory as it has developed over the years in their work. This method, in treating motive as an illustration, engages it as an example of the status of the signifier as a symptom of interpretive conflict endemic to any situation of action, always inviting an analysis of the symbolic order and imaginative structure that sustains the distinction as a force in social life. In this paper, motive in particular is unpacked to show how it serves as an indication of fundamental ambiguity with respect to a problem-solving situation, revealing in this case constant perplexity in relation to the enigmatic character of what comes to view on any occasion and the recurrent contestation that is released.http://compaso.eu/wpd/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Motives_Compaso2013-42-Blum.pdfMotivedesiredriveselfboredom
spellingShingle Alan Blum
Motive, desire, drive: the discourse of force
Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology
Motive
desire
drive
self
boredom
title Motive, desire, drive: the discourse of force
title_full Motive, desire, drive: the discourse of force
title_fullStr Motive, desire, drive: the discourse of force
title_full_unstemmed Motive, desire, drive: the discourse of force
title_short Motive, desire, drive: the discourse of force
title_sort motive desire drive the discourse of force
topic Motive
desire
drive
self
boredom
url http://compaso.eu/wpd/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Motives_Compaso2013-42-Blum.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alanblum motivedesiredrivethediscourseofforce