Motive, desire, drive: the discourse of force
A review of the original paper on motive by Blum and McHugh (1971) is used as an occasion to make transparent an approach to social theory as it has developed over the years in their work. This method, in treating motive as an illustration, engages it as an example of the status of the signifier as...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Bucharest
2013-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://compaso.eu/wpd/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Motives_Compaso2013-42-Blum.pdf |
_version_ | 1818137171716997120 |
---|---|
author | Alan Blum |
author_facet | Alan Blum |
author_sort | Alan Blum |
collection | DOAJ |
description | A review of the original paper on motive by Blum and McHugh (1971) is used as an occasion to make transparent an approach to social theory as it has developed over the years in their work. This method, in treating motive as an illustration, engages it as an example of the status of the signifier as a symptom of interpretive conflict endemic to any situation of action, always inviting an analysis of the symbolic order and imaginative structure that sustains the distinction as a force in social life. In this paper, motive in particular is unpacked to show how it serves as an indication of fundamental ambiguity with respect to a problem-solving situation, revealing in this case constant perplexity in relation to the enigmatic character of what comes to view on any occasion and the recurrent contestation that is released. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T09:52:04Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0f91cfbcaa2d475eb5faada394ac25f7 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2068-0317 2068-0317 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T09:52:04Z |
publishDate | 2013-12-01 |
publisher | University of Bucharest |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology |
spelling | doaj.art-0f91cfbcaa2d475eb5faada394ac25f72022-12-22T01:12:23ZengUniversity of BucharestJournal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology2068-03172068-03172013-12-0142519Motive, desire, drive: the discourse of forceAlan Blum0York University, Canada, Executive Director, Culture of Cities CentreA review of the original paper on motive by Blum and McHugh (1971) is used as an occasion to make transparent an approach to social theory as it has developed over the years in their work. This method, in treating motive as an illustration, engages it as an example of the status of the signifier as a symptom of interpretive conflict endemic to any situation of action, always inviting an analysis of the symbolic order and imaginative structure that sustains the distinction as a force in social life. In this paper, motive in particular is unpacked to show how it serves as an indication of fundamental ambiguity with respect to a problem-solving situation, revealing in this case constant perplexity in relation to the enigmatic character of what comes to view on any occasion and the recurrent contestation that is released.http://compaso.eu/wpd/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Motives_Compaso2013-42-Blum.pdfMotivedesiredriveselfboredom |
spellingShingle | Alan Blum Motive, desire, drive: the discourse of force Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology Motive desire drive self boredom |
title | Motive, desire, drive: the discourse of force |
title_full | Motive, desire, drive: the discourse of force |
title_fullStr | Motive, desire, drive: the discourse of force |
title_full_unstemmed | Motive, desire, drive: the discourse of force |
title_short | Motive, desire, drive: the discourse of force |
title_sort | motive desire drive the discourse of force |
topic | Motive desire drive self boredom |
url | http://compaso.eu/wpd/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Motives_Compaso2013-42-Blum.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alanblum motivedesiredrivethediscourseofforce |