Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation
AbstractThis final article in the four-part series focuses on the often neglected yet important role of the public in implementing research in General Practice and Primary Care more broadly. Experience in implementation of findings from research with public engagement in Primary Care has highlighted...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2023-12-01
|
Series: | European Journal of General Practice |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/13814788.2023.2243037 |
_version_ | 1797403139377201152 |
---|---|
author | Laura Swaithes Laura Campbell Sibyl Anthierens Magdalena Skrybant Dieuwke Schiphof Helen French Maarten de Wit Steven Blackburn Krysia Dziedzic |
author_facet | Laura Swaithes Laura Campbell Sibyl Anthierens Magdalena Skrybant Dieuwke Schiphof Helen French Maarten de Wit Steven Blackburn Krysia Dziedzic |
author_sort | Laura Swaithes |
collection | DOAJ |
description | AbstractThis final article in the four-part series focuses on the often neglected yet important role of the public in implementing research in General Practice and Primary Care more broadly. Experience in implementation of findings from research with public engagement in Primary Care has highlighted how partnership working with patients and the public is important in transitioning from ‘what we know’ from the evidence-base to ‘what we do’ in practice. Factors related to Primary Care research that make public engagement important are highlighted e.g. implementing complex interventions, implementing interventions that increase health equity, implementing interventions in countries with different primary healthcare system strengths. Involvement of patients and public can enhance the development of modelling and simulation included in studies on systems modelling for improving health services. We draw on the emerging evidence base to describe public engagement in implementation and offer some guiding principles for engaging with the public in the implementation in General Practice and Primary Care in general. Illustrative case studies are included to support others wishing to offer meaningful engagement in implementing research evidence. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T02:35:07Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0f94bc70480d45b4aff5925a3f02eac0 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1381-4788 1751-1402 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T02:35:07Z |
publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
record_format | Article |
series | European Journal of General Practice |
spelling | doaj.art-0f94bc70480d45b4aff5925a3f02eac02023-12-06T11:11:04ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEuropean Journal of General Practice1381-47881751-14022023-12-0129110.1080/13814788.2023.2243037Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementationLaura Swaithes0Laura Campbell1Sibyl Anthierens2Magdalena Skrybant3Dieuwke Schiphof4Helen French5Maarten de Wit6Steven Blackburn7Krysia Dziedzic8Impact Accelerator Unit, Versus Arthritis Primary Care Centre, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, United KingdomImpact Accelerator Unit, Versus Arthritis Primary Care Centre, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, United KingdomDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerpen, Antwerpen, BelgiumNational Institute of Applied Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Institute of Applied Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United KingdomDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsSchool of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, IrelandPatient Research Partner, Stichting Tools, The NetherlandsInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United KingdomImpact Accelerator Unit, Versus Arthritis Primary Care Centre, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, United KingdomAbstractThis final article in the four-part series focuses on the often neglected yet important role of the public in implementing research in General Practice and Primary Care more broadly. Experience in implementation of findings from research with public engagement in Primary Care has highlighted how partnership working with patients and the public is important in transitioning from ‘what we know’ from the evidence-base to ‘what we do’ in practice. Factors related to Primary Care research that make public engagement important are highlighted e.g. implementing complex interventions, implementing interventions that increase health equity, implementing interventions in countries with different primary healthcare system strengths. Involvement of patients and public can enhance the development of modelling and simulation included in studies on systems modelling for improving health services. We draw on the emerging evidence base to describe public engagement in implementation and offer some guiding principles for engaging with the public in the implementation in General Practice and Primary Care in general. Illustrative case studies are included to support others wishing to offer meaningful engagement in implementing research evidence.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/13814788.2023.2243037Patient and public involvementimplementationgeneral practiceknowledge mobilisation |
spellingShingle | Laura Swaithes Laura Campbell Sibyl Anthierens Magdalena Skrybant Dieuwke Schiphof Helen French Maarten de Wit Steven Blackburn Krysia Dziedzic Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation European Journal of General Practice Patient and public involvement implementation general practice knowledge mobilisation |
title | Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation |
title_full | Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation |
title_fullStr | Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation |
title_full_unstemmed | Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation |
title_short | Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation |
title_sort | series public engagement with research part 4 maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation |
topic | Patient and public involvement implementation general practice knowledge mobilisation |
url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/13814788.2023.2243037 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lauraswaithes seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation AT lauracampbell seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation AT sibylanthierens seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation AT magdalenaskrybant seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation AT dieuwkeschiphof seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation AT helenfrench seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation AT maartendewit seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation AT stevenblackburn seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation AT krysiadziedzic seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation |