Impact of bowel space contouring variability on radiation dose and volume assessments in treatment planning for gynaecologic cancers

Abstract Introduction Correlations between radiation dose/volume measures and small bowel (SB) toxicity are inconsistent in the medical literature. We assessed the impact of inter‐provider variation in bowel bag contouring technique on estimates of radiation dose received by the SB during pelvic rad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatjona Kraja, Kevin Kauweloa, Rohit G. Ganju, Andrew C. Hoover
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-12-01
Series:Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.703
_version_ 1827586449668571136
author Fatjona Kraja
Kevin Kauweloa
Rohit G. Ganju
Andrew C. Hoover
author_facet Fatjona Kraja
Kevin Kauweloa
Rohit G. Ganju
Andrew C. Hoover
author_sort Fatjona Kraja
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Correlations between radiation dose/volume measures and small bowel (SB) toxicity are inconsistent in the medical literature. We assessed the impact of inter‐provider variation in bowel bag contouring technique on estimates of radiation dose received by the SB during pelvic radiotherapy. Methods Ten radiation oncologists contoured rectum, bladder and bowel bags on treatment planning computed tomography (CT) scans of two patients receiving adjuvant radiation for endometrial cancer. A radiation plan was generated for each patient and used to determine the radiation dose/volume for each organ. Kappa statistics were applied to assess the inter‐provider contouring agreement, and Levene test evaluated the homogeneity of variance for radiation dose/volume metrics, including the V45Gy (cm3). Results The bowel bag showed greater variation in radiation dose/volume estimates compared to the bladder and rectum. The V45Gy ranged from 163 to 384 cm3 for data set A and 109 to 409 cm3 for dataset B. Kappa values were 0.82/0.83, 0.92/0.92 and 0.94/0.86 for the bowel bag, rectum, and bladder on data sets A/B, demonstrating lower inter‐provider agreement for bowel bag compared with bladder and rectum. Conclusion Inter‐provider contouring variability is more significant for the bowel bag than the rectum and bladder, with an associated greater variability in dose and volume estimates during radiation planning.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T00:02:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0f962516f760449bb4daf668e7c587b1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2051-3895
2051-3909
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T00:02:39Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
spelling doaj.art-0f962516f760449bb4daf668e7c587b12023-12-12T15:36:38ZengWileyJournal of Medical Radiation Sciences2051-38952051-39092023-12-0170441742310.1002/jmrs.703Impact of bowel space contouring variability on radiation dose and volume assessments in treatment planning for gynaecologic cancersFatjona Kraja0Kevin Kauweloa1Rohit G. Ganju2Andrew C. Hoover3Department of Oncology University Hospital Centre Mother Teresa Tirana AlbaniaDepartment of Radiation Oncology Queen's Medical Centre Honolulu Hawaii USAWellstar Medical Group Alpharetta Georgia USADepartment of Radiation Oncology University of Kansas Cancer Centre, Kansas University Medical Centre Kansas City Kansas USAAbstract Introduction Correlations between radiation dose/volume measures and small bowel (SB) toxicity are inconsistent in the medical literature. We assessed the impact of inter‐provider variation in bowel bag contouring technique on estimates of radiation dose received by the SB during pelvic radiotherapy. Methods Ten radiation oncologists contoured rectum, bladder and bowel bags on treatment planning computed tomography (CT) scans of two patients receiving adjuvant radiation for endometrial cancer. A radiation plan was generated for each patient and used to determine the radiation dose/volume for each organ. Kappa statistics were applied to assess the inter‐provider contouring agreement, and Levene test evaluated the homogeneity of variance for radiation dose/volume metrics, including the V45Gy (cm3). Results The bowel bag showed greater variation in radiation dose/volume estimates compared to the bladder and rectum. The V45Gy ranged from 163 to 384 cm3 for data set A and 109 to 409 cm3 for dataset B. Kappa values were 0.82/0.83, 0.92/0.92 and 0.94/0.86 for the bowel bag, rectum, and bladder on data sets A/B, demonstrating lower inter‐provider agreement for bowel bag compared with bladder and rectum. Conclusion Inter‐provider contouring variability is more significant for the bowel bag than the rectum and bladder, with an associated greater variability in dose and volume estimates during radiation planning.https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.703Pelvisradiation oncologytechnique
spellingShingle Fatjona Kraja
Kevin Kauweloa
Rohit G. Ganju
Andrew C. Hoover
Impact of bowel space contouring variability on radiation dose and volume assessments in treatment planning for gynaecologic cancers
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Pelvis
radiation oncology
technique
title Impact of bowel space contouring variability on radiation dose and volume assessments in treatment planning for gynaecologic cancers
title_full Impact of bowel space contouring variability on radiation dose and volume assessments in treatment planning for gynaecologic cancers
title_fullStr Impact of bowel space contouring variability on radiation dose and volume assessments in treatment planning for gynaecologic cancers
title_full_unstemmed Impact of bowel space contouring variability on radiation dose and volume assessments in treatment planning for gynaecologic cancers
title_short Impact of bowel space contouring variability on radiation dose and volume assessments in treatment planning for gynaecologic cancers
title_sort impact of bowel space contouring variability on radiation dose and volume assessments in treatment planning for gynaecologic cancers
topic Pelvis
radiation oncology
technique
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.703
work_keys_str_mv AT fatjonakraja impactofbowelspacecontouringvariabilityonradiationdoseandvolumeassessmentsintreatmentplanningforgynaecologiccancers
AT kevinkauweloa impactofbowelspacecontouringvariabilityonradiationdoseandvolumeassessmentsintreatmentplanningforgynaecologiccancers
AT rohitgganju impactofbowelspacecontouringvariabilityonradiationdoseandvolumeassessmentsintreatmentplanningforgynaecologiccancers
AT andrewchoover impactofbowelspacecontouringvariabilityonradiationdoseandvolumeassessmentsintreatmentplanningforgynaecologiccancers