Examining belief adjusment model and framing effect on the audit materiality level decision making

The purpose of this study is to examine whether or not there is a difference in the decision making of external auditors in determining the level of audit materiality between participants who get good news followed by bad news and those who get bad news information sequences (bad news) followed by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Febriyani Sarwindah, Luciana Spica Almilia, Nurul Mustafida
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Islam Indonesia 2024-03-01
Series:Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia
Online Access:https://journal.uii.ac.id/JAAI/article/view/25557
_version_ 1797253819769290752
author Febriyani Sarwindah
Luciana Spica Almilia
Nurul Mustafida
author_facet Febriyani Sarwindah
Luciana Spica Almilia
Nurul Mustafida
author_sort Febriyani Sarwindah
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this study is to examine whether or not there is a difference in the decision making of external auditors in determining the level of audit materiality between participants who get good news followed by bad news and those who get bad news information sequences (bad news) followed by good news (good news) with a step-by-step and end-of-sequence information presentation pattern in positif frame or negative frame. The research method used in the research is the mixed design experiment method (between and within subject) which manipulates the independent variables of the order of evidence (good news followed by bad news and bad news followed by good news) and fraaming effect (positif frame or negatif frame) in the presentation pattern Step by Step and End of Sequence. Participants in this study were 150 students of the Bachelor of Accounting study program at Hayam Wuruk Perbanas Surabaya University with 300 experiment data. This study uses the normality test, and the Kruskall-Wallis H test. The results of this study indicate that the Step by Step presentation pattern can cause a recency effect when receiving an information with a sequence of evidence of good news followed by bad news and bad news followed by good news both in the serie, with positif or negatif frame, and the results obtained if the information is presented with an End of Sequence presentation pattern with an information and a sequence of evidence of good news followed by bad news or bad news followed by good news there is no difference (no order effect) either in the framming effect (positif frame and negatif frame).
first_indexed 2024-04-24T21:40:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0fa8bf0e215b4c71a2077c6dfbb8b4d1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1410-2420
2528-6528
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T21:40:07Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Universitas Islam Indonesia
record_format Article
series Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia
spelling doaj.art-0fa8bf0e215b4c71a2077c6dfbb8b4d12024-03-21T07:59:57ZengUniversitas Islam IndonesiaJurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia1410-24202528-65282024-03-01272Examining belief adjusment model and framing effect on the audit materiality level decision makingFebriyani Sarwindah0Luciana Spica Almilia1Nurul Mustafida2Universitas Hayam Wuruk Perbanas Surabaya, Surabaya, IndonesiaUniversitas Hayam Wuruk Perbanas Surabaya, Surabaya, IndonesiaUniversitas Hayam Wuruk Perbanas Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia The purpose of this study is to examine whether or not there is a difference in the decision making of external auditors in determining the level of audit materiality between participants who get good news followed by bad news and those who get bad news information sequences (bad news) followed by good news (good news) with a step-by-step and end-of-sequence information presentation pattern in positif frame or negative frame. The research method used in the research is the mixed design experiment method (between and within subject) which manipulates the independent variables of the order of evidence (good news followed by bad news and bad news followed by good news) and fraaming effect (positif frame or negatif frame) in the presentation pattern Step by Step and End of Sequence. Participants in this study were 150 students of the Bachelor of Accounting study program at Hayam Wuruk Perbanas Surabaya University with 300 experiment data. This study uses the normality test, and the Kruskall-Wallis H test. The results of this study indicate that the Step by Step presentation pattern can cause a recency effect when receiving an information with a sequence of evidence of good news followed by bad news and bad news followed by good news both in the serie, with positif or negatif frame, and the results obtained if the information is presented with an End of Sequence presentation pattern with an information and a sequence of evidence of good news followed by bad news or bad news followed by good news there is no difference (no order effect) either in the framming effect (positif frame and negatif frame). https://journal.uii.ac.id/JAAI/article/view/25557
spellingShingle Febriyani Sarwindah
Luciana Spica Almilia
Nurul Mustafida
Examining belief adjusment model and framing effect on the audit materiality level decision making
Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia
title Examining belief adjusment model and framing effect on the audit materiality level decision making
title_full Examining belief adjusment model and framing effect on the audit materiality level decision making
title_fullStr Examining belief adjusment model and framing effect on the audit materiality level decision making
title_full_unstemmed Examining belief adjusment model and framing effect on the audit materiality level decision making
title_short Examining belief adjusment model and framing effect on the audit materiality level decision making
title_sort examining belief adjusment model and framing effect on the audit materiality level decision making
url https://journal.uii.ac.id/JAAI/article/view/25557
work_keys_str_mv AT febriyanisarwindah examiningbeliefadjusmentmodelandframingeffectontheauditmaterialityleveldecisionmaking
AT lucianaspicaalmilia examiningbeliefadjusmentmodelandframingeffectontheauditmaterialityleveldecisionmaking
AT nurulmustafida examiningbeliefadjusmentmodelandframingeffectontheauditmaterialityleveldecisionmaking