Preoperative evaluation to determine the difficulty of No. 6 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy

Abstract Background Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) requires a long learning curve because of the complicated surgical procedures. Infrapyloric (No. 6) lymph node dissection (LND) is one of the difficult procedures in LG, especially for trainees. This study investigated the impact of the prediction of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chie Takasu, Masaaki Nishi, Kozo Yoshikawa, Takuya Tokunaga, Hideya Kashihara, Yuma Wada, Toshiaki Yoshimoto, Mitsuo Shimada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-02-01
Series:BMC Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02349-8
_version_ 1827328799229870080
author Chie Takasu
Masaaki Nishi
Kozo Yoshikawa
Takuya Tokunaga
Hideya Kashihara
Yuma Wada
Toshiaki Yoshimoto
Mitsuo Shimada
author_facet Chie Takasu
Masaaki Nishi
Kozo Yoshikawa
Takuya Tokunaga
Hideya Kashihara
Yuma Wada
Toshiaki Yoshimoto
Mitsuo Shimada
author_sort Chie Takasu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) requires a long learning curve because of the complicated surgical procedures. Infrapyloric (No. 6) lymph node dissection (LND) is one of the difficult procedures in LG, especially for trainees. This study investigated the impact of the prediction of the difficulty of No. 6 LND. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative computed tomography (CT) images and individual operative video records of 57 patients who underwent LG with No. 6 LND to define and predict the No. 6 LND difficulty. To evaluate whether prediction of the difficulty of No. 6 LND could improve surgical outcomes, 48 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy were assessed (30 patients without prediction by a qualified surgeon and 18 patients with prediction by a trainee). Results The anatomical characteristic that LND required > 2 cm of dissection along the right gastroepiploic vein was defined as difficulty of No. 6 LND. Of the 57 LG patients, difficulty was identified intraoperatively in 21 patients (36.8%). Among the several evaluated anatomical parameters, the length between the right gastroepiploic vein and the right gastroepiploic artery in the maximum intensity projection in contrast-enhanced CT images was significantly correlated with the intraoperative difficulty of No. 6 LND (p < 0.0001). Surgical outcomes, namely intraoperative minor bleeding, postoperative pancreatic fistula, and drain amylase concentration were not significantly different between LG performed by a trainee with prediction compared with that by a specialist without prediction. Conclusions Preoperative evaluation of the difficulty of No. 6 LND is useful for trainees, to improve surgical outcomes.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T15:22:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0fbd9dfe029849edbcfb9330a056a3f4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2482
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T15:22:34Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Surgery
spelling doaj.art-0fbd9dfe029849edbcfb9330a056a3f42024-03-05T17:31:10ZengBMCBMC Surgery1471-24822024-02-012411810.1186/s12893-024-02349-8Preoperative evaluation to determine the difficulty of No. 6 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomyChie Takasu0Masaaki Nishi1Kozo Yoshikawa2Takuya Tokunaga3Hideya Kashihara4Yuma Wada5Toshiaki Yoshimoto6Mitsuo Shimada7Department of Surgery, University of TokushimaDepartment of Surgery, University of TokushimaDepartment of Surgery, University of TokushimaDepartment of Surgery, University of TokushimaDepartment of Surgery, University of TokushimaDepartment of Surgery, University of TokushimaDepartment of Surgery, University of TokushimaDepartment of Surgery, University of TokushimaAbstract Background Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) requires a long learning curve because of the complicated surgical procedures. Infrapyloric (No. 6) lymph node dissection (LND) is one of the difficult procedures in LG, especially for trainees. This study investigated the impact of the prediction of the difficulty of No. 6 LND. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative computed tomography (CT) images and individual operative video records of 57 patients who underwent LG with No. 6 LND to define and predict the No. 6 LND difficulty. To evaluate whether prediction of the difficulty of No. 6 LND could improve surgical outcomes, 48 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy were assessed (30 patients without prediction by a qualified surgeon and 18 patients with prediction by a trainee). Results The anatomical characteristic that LND required > 2 cm of dissection along the right gastroepiploic vein was defined as difficulty of No. 6 LND. Of the 57 LG patients, difficulty was identified intraoperatively in 21 patients (36.8%). Among the several evaluated anatomical parameters, the length between the right gastroepiploic vein and the right gastroepiploic artery in the maximum intensity projection in contrast-enhanced CT images was significantly correlated with the intraoperative difficulty of No. 6 LND (p < 0.0001). Surgical outcomes, namely intraoperative minor bleeding, postoperative pancreatic fistula, and drain amylase concentration were not significantly different between LG performed by a trainee with prediction compared with that by a specialist without prediction. Conclusions Preoperative evaluation of the difficulty of No. 6 LND is useful for trainees, to improve surgical outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02349-8Gastric cancerPredictionPancreatic fistulaTraineeLaparoscopic gastrectomyNo. 6 LND
spellingShingle Chie Takasu
Masaaki Nishi
Kozo Yoshikawa
Takuya Tokunaga
Hideya Kashihara
Yuma Wada
Toshiaki Yoshimoto
Mitsuo Shimada
Preoperative evaluation to determine the difficulty of No. 6 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy
BMC Surgery
Gastric cancer
Prediction
Pancreatic fistula
Trainee
Laparoscopic gastrectomy
No. 6 LND
title Preoperative evaluation to determine the difficulty of No. 6 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy
title_full Preoperative evaluation to determine the difficulty of No. 6 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy
title_fullStr Preoperative evaluation to determine the difficulty of No. 6 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative evaluation to determine the difficulty of No. 6 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy
title_short Preoperative evaluation to determine the difficulty of No. 6 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy
title_sort preoperative evaluation to determine the difficulty of no 6 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy
topic Gastric cancer
Prediction
Pancreatic fistula
Trainee
Laparoscopic gastrectomy
No. 6 LND
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02349-8
work_keys_str_mv AT chietakasu preoperativeevaluationtodeterminethedifficultyofno6lymphadenectomyinlaparoscopicgastrectomy
AT masaakinishi preoperativeevaluationtodeterminethedifficultyofno6lymphadenectomyinlaparoscopicgastrectomy
AT kozoyoshikawa preoperativeevaluationtodeterminethedifficultyofno6lymphadenectomyinlaparoscopicgastrectomy
AT takuyatokunaga preoperativeevaluationtodeterminethedifficultyofno6lymphadenectomyinlaparoscopicgastrectomy
AT hideyakashihara preoperativeevaluationtodeterminethedifficultyofno6lymphadenectomyinlaparoscopicgastrectomy
AT yumawada preoperativeevaluationtodeterminethedifficultyofno6lymphadenectomyinlaparoscopicgastrectomy
AT toshiakiyoshimoto preoperativeevaluationtodeterminethedifficultyofno6lymphadenectomyinlaparoscopicgastrectomy
AT mitsuoshimada preoperativeevaluationtodeterminethedifficultyofno6lymphadenectomyinlaparoscopicgastrectomy