A descriptive analysis of a representative sample of pediatric randomized controlled trials published in 2007
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for trials assessing the effects of therapeutic interventions; therefore it is important to understand how they are conducted. Our objectives were to provide an overview of a...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2010-12-01
|
| Series: | BMC Pediatrics |
| Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/10/96 |
| _version_ | 1818347385643859968 |
|---|---|
| author | Thomson Denise Vandermeer Ben Tjosvold Lisa Milne Andrea Hartling Lisa Hamm Michele P Curtis Sarah Klassen Terry P |
| author_facet | Thomson Denise Vandermeer Ben Tjosvold Lisa Milne Andrea Hartling Lisa Hamm Michele P Curtis Sarah Klassen Terry P |
| author_sort | Thomson Denise |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for trials assessing the effects of therapeutic interventions; therefore it is important to understand how they are conducted. Our objectives were to provide an overview of a representative sample of pediatric RCTs published in 2007 and assess the validity of their results.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using a pediatric filter and randomly selected 300 RCTs published in 2007. We extracted data on trial characteristics; outcomes; methodological quality; reporting; and registration and protocol characteristics. Trial registration and protocol availability were determined for each study based on the publication, an Internet search and an author survey.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Most studies (83%) were efficacy trials, 40% evaluated drugs, and 30% were placebo-controlled. Primary outcomes were specified in 41%; 43% reported on adverse events. At least one statistically significant outcome was reported in 77% of trials; 63% favored the treatment group. Trial registration was declared in 12% of publications and 23% were found through an Internet search. Risk of bias (ROB) was high in 59% of trials, unclear in 33%, and low in 8%. Registered trials were more likely to have low ROB than non-registered trials (16% <it>vs</it>. 5%; <it>p </it>= 0.008). Effect sizes tended to be larger for trials at high <it>vs</it>. low ROB (0.28, 95% CI 0.21,0.35 <it>vs</it>. 0.16, 95% CI 0.07,0.25). Among survey respondents (50% response rate), the most common reason for trial registration was a publication requirement and for non-registration, a lack of familiarity with the process.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>More than half of this random sample of pediatric RCTs published in 2007 was at high ROB and three quarters of trials were not registered. There is an urgent need to improve the design, conduct, and reporting of child health research.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-13T17:33:19Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0fc30a75f5424caaaf0f7397ed9548f3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1471-2431 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-13T17:33:19Z |
| publishDate | 2010-12-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Pediatrics |
| spelling | doaj.art-0fc30a75f5424caaaf0f7397ed9548f32022-12-21T23:36:58ZengBMCBMC Pediatrics1471-24312010-12-011019610.1186/1471-2431-10-96A descriptive analysis of a representative sample of pediatric randomized controlled trials published in 2007Thomson DeniseVandermeer BenTjosvold LisaMilne AndreaHartling LisaHamm Michele PCurtis SarahKlassen Terry P<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for trials assessing the effects of therapeutic interventions; therefore it is important to understand how they are conducted. Our objectives were to provide an overview of a representative sample of pediatric RCTs published in 2007 and assess the validity of their results.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using a pediatric filter and randomly selected 300 RCTs published in 2007. We extracted data on trial characteristics; outcomes; methodological quality; reporting; and registration and protocol characteristics. Trial registration and protocol availability were determined for each study based on the publication, an Internet search and an author survey.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Most studies (83%) were efficacy trials, 40% evaluated drugs, and 30% were placebo-controlled. Primary outcomes were specified in 41%; 43% reported on adverse events. At least one statistically significant outcome was reported in 77% of trials; 63% favored the treatment group. Trial registration was declared in 12% of publications and 23% were found through an Internet search. Risk of bias (ROB) was high in 59% of trials, unclear in 33%, and low in 8%. Registered trials were more likely to have low ROB than non-registered trials (16% <it>vs</it>. 5%; <it>p </it>= 0.008). Effect sizes tended to be larger for trials at high <it>vs</it>. low ROB (0.28, 95% CI 0.21,0.35 <it>vs</it>. 0.16, 95% CI 0.07,0.25). Among survey respondents (50% response rate), the most common reason for trial registration was a publication requirement and for non-registration, a lack of familiarity with the process.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>More than half of this random sample of pediatric RCTs published in 2007 was at high ROB and three quarters of trials were not registered. There is an urgent need to improve the design, conduct, and reporting of child health research.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/10/96 |
| spellingShingle | Thomson Denise Vandermeer Ben Tjosvold Lisa Milne Andrea Hartling Lisa Hamm Michele P Curtis Sarah Klassen Terry P A descriptive analysis of a representative sample of pediatric randomized controlled trials published in 2007 BMC Pediatrics |
| title | A descriptive analysis of a representative sample of pediatric randomized controlled trials published in 2007 |
| title_full | A descriptive analysis of a representative sample of pediatric randomized controlled trials published in 2007 |
| title_fullStr | A descriptive analysis of a representative sample of pediatric randomized controlled trials published in 2007 |
| title_full_unstemmed | A descriptive analysis of a representative sample of pediatric randomized controlled trials published in 2007 |
| title_short | A descriptive analysis of a representative sample of pediatric randomized controlled trials published in 2007 |
| title_sort | descriptive analysis of a representative sample of pediatric randomized controlled trials published in 2007 |
| url | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/10/96 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thomsondenise adescriptiveanalysisofarepresentativesampleofpediatricrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedin2007 AT vandermeerben adescriptiveanalysisofarepresentativesampleofpediatricrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedin2007 AT tjosvoldlisa adescriptiveanalysisofarepresentativesampleofpediatricrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedin2007 AT milneandrea adescriptiveanalysisofarepresentativesampleofpediatricrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedin2007 AT hartlinglisa adescriptiveanalysisofarepresentativesampleofpediatricrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedin2007 AT hammmichelep adescriptiveanalysisofarepresentativesampleofpediatricrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedin2007 AT curtissarah adescriptiveanalysisofarepresentativesampleofpediatricrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedin2007 AT klassenterryp adescriptiveanalysisofarepresentativesampleofpediatricrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedin2007 AT thomsondenise descriptiveanalysisofarepresentativesampleofpediatricrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedin2007 AT vandermeerben descriptiveanalysisofarepresentativesampleofpediatricrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedin2007 AT tjosvoldlisa descriptiveanalysisofarepresentativesampleofpediatricrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedin2007 AT milneandrea descriptiveanalysisofarepresentativesampleofpediatricrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedin2007 AT hartlinglisa descriptiveanalysisofarepresentativesampleofpediatricrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedin2007 AT hammmichelep descriptiveanalysisofarepresentativesampleofpediatricrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedin2007 AT curtissarah descriptiveanalysisofarepresentativesampleofpediatricrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedin2007 AT klassenterryp descriptiveanalysisofarepresentativesampleofpediatricrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedin2007 |