Values disclosures and trust in science: A replication study

While philosophers of science generally agree that social, political, and ethical values can play legitimate roles in science, there is active debate over whether scientists should disclosure such values in their public communications. This debate depends, in part, on empirical claims about whether...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel J. Hicks, Emilio Jon Christopher Lobato
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2022.1017362/full
_version_ 1797990080422346752
author Daniel J. Hicks
Emilio Jon Christopher Lobato
author_facet Daniel J. Hicks
Emilio Jon Christopher Lobato
author_sort Daniel J. Hicks
collection DOAJ
description While philosophers of science generally agree that social, political, and ethical values can play legitimate roles in science, there is active debate over whether scientists should disclosure such values in their public communications. This debate depends, in part, on empirical claims about whether values disclosures might undermine public trust in science. In a previous study, Elliott et al. used an online experiment to test this empirical claim. The current paper reports a replication attempt of their experiment. Comparing results of the original study and our replication, we do not find evidence for a transparency penalty or “shared values” effect, but do find evidence that the content of scientific conclusions (whether or not a chemical is found to cause harm) might effect perceived trustworthiness and that scientists who value public health and disclose this value might be perceived as more trustworthy.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T08:30:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0fd7207536ff4c5bb9779f6d9d409355
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-900X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T08:30:47Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Communication
spelling doaj.art-0fd7207536ff4c5bb9779f6d9d4093552022-12-22T04:34:31ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Communication2297-900X2022-11-01710.3389/fcomm.2022.10173621017362Values disclosures and trust in science: A replication studyDaniel J. HicksEmilio Jon Christopher LobatoWhile philosophers of science generally agree that social, political, and ethical values can play legitimate roles in science, there is active debate over whether scientists should disclosure such values in their public communications. This debate depends, in part, on empirical claims about whether values disclosures might undermine public trust in science. In a previous study, Elliott et al. used an online experiment to test this empirical claim. The current paper reports a replication attempt of their experiment. Comparing results of the original study and our replication, we do not find evidence for a transparency penalty or “shared values” effect, but do find evidence that the content of scientific conclusions (whether or not a chemical is found to cause harm) might effect perceived trustworthiness and that scientists who value public health and disclose this value might be perceived as more trustworthy.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2022.1017362/fulltrusttrust in sciencevalues in sciencereplicationphilosophy of science
spellingShingle Daniel J. Hicks
Emilio Jon Christopher Lobato
Values disclosures and trust in science: A replication study
Frontiers in Communication
trust
trust in science
values in science
replication
philosophy of science
title Values disclosures and trust in science: A replication study
title_full Values disclosures and trust in science: A replication study
title_fullStr Values disclosures and trust in science: A replication study
title_full_unstemmed Values disclosures and trust in science: A replication study
title_short Values disclosures and trust in science: A replication study
title_sort values disclosures and trust in science a replication study
topic trust
trust in science
values in science
replication
philosophy of science
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2022.1017362/full
work_keys_str_mv AT danieljhicks valuesdisclosuresandtrustinscienceareplicationstudy
AT emiliojonchristopherlobato valuesdisclosuresandtrustinscienceareplicationstudy