A Comparison of Shear Wave Elastography between Normal Myometrium, Uterine Fibroids, and Adenomyosis: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: The differential diagnosis between uterine fibroid and adenomyosis is sometimes difficult; a precise diagnosis is required in women with infertility because of the different choice of treatments. Ultrasound elastography (UE) is a novel technique to evaluate the elasticity or the stiffnes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sutee Pongpunprut, Panyu Paburana, Pornphan Wibulpolprasert, Wanwisa Waiyaput, Morakot Sroyraya, Tharintorn Chansoon, Areepan Sophonsritsuk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Royan Institute (ACECR), Tehran 2022-01-01
Series:International Journal of Fertility and Sterility
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ijfs.ir/article_247952_3122ad5b1207b7146985122196ab9cf4.pdf
_version_ 1828133907938148352
author Sutee Pongpunprut
Panyu Paburana
Pornphan Wibulpolprasert
Wanwisa Waiyaput
Morakot Sroyraya
Tharintorn Chansoon
Areepan Sophonsritsuk
author_facet Sutee Pongpunprut
Panyu Paburana
Pornphan Wibulpolprasert
Wanwisa Waiyaput
Morakot Sroyraya
Tharintorn Chansoon
Areepan Sophonsritsuk
author_sort Sutee Pongpunprut
collection DOAJ
description Background: The differential diagnosis between uterine fibroid and adenomyosis is sometimes difficult; a precise diagnosis is required in women with infertility because of the different choice of treatments. Ultrasound elastography (UE) is a novel technique to evaluate the elasticity or the stiffness of the tissue of interest. The present study aims to compare UE shear wave velocity (SWV) among normal uterine myometrium, uterine fibroid, and adenomyosis, and assess the accuracy of shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis.Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 25 subjects for each group (control, adenomyosis, and fibroid) from April 2019 to April 2020. Transvaginal UE using an Aplio 500 (Toshiba Medical Systems, Japan) with ultrasound mapping for point of tissue biopsy was performed for all subjects. The diagnosis was confirmed by histology. Masson’s trichrome staining for collagen was performed and quantified.Results: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) for SWV was 3.44 ± 0.95 m/seconds (control group), 4.63 ± 1.45 m/seconds (adenomyosis group), and 4.53 ± 1.07 m/seconds (fibroid group). The mean SWV differed when comparing normal myometrium and adenomyosis after adjustments for age and endometrial pathology (P=0.019). The cut-off point of SWV at 3.465 m/seconds could differentiate adenomyosis from the normal uterus with an 80% sensitivity, 80% specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.93) (P<0.001). No significant difference in SWV between the adenomyosis and fibroid groups was detected.Conclusion: Shear wave elastography could be an alternative tool to distinguish between normal myometrium and adenomyosis; however, it could not differentiate adenomyosis from uterine fibroid or uterine fibroid from normal myometrium.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T17:26:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-10058443fd4040bcbb1a15a7a7366c6f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-076X
2008-0778
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T17:26:24Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Royan Institute (ACECR), Tehran
record_format Article
series International Journal of Fertility and Sterility
spelling doaj.art-10058443fd4040bcbb1a15a7a7366c6f2022-12-22T04:12:16ZengRoyan Institute (ACECR), TehranInternational Journal of Fertility and Sterility2008-076X2008-07782022-01-01161495410.22074/ijfs.2021.523075.1074247952A Comparison of Shear Wave Elastography between Normal Myometrium, Uterine Fibroids, and Adenomyosis: A Cross-Sectional StudySutee Pongpunprut0Panyu Paburana1Pornphan Wibulpolprasert2Wanwisa Waiyaput3Morakot Sroyraya4Tharintorn Chansoon5Areepan Sophonsritsuk6Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Centre, Srinakharinwirot University, Nontaburi, ThailandFoetal and Maternal Medicine Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandDivision of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic, Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandOffice of Research Academic and Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandReproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathidodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandBackground: The differential diagnosis between uterine fibroid and adenomyosis is sometimes difficult; a precise diagnosis is required in women with infertility because of the different choice of treatments. Ultrasound elastography (UE) is a novel technique to evaluate the elasticity or the stiffness of the tissue of interest. The present study aims to compare UE shear wave velocity (SWV) among normal uterine myometrium, uterine fibroid, and adenomyosis, and assess the accuracy of shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis.Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 25 subjects for each group (control, adenomyosis, and fibroid) from April 2019 to April 2020. Transvaginal UE using an Aplio 500 (Toshiba Medical Systems, Japan) with ultrasound mapping for point of tissue biopsy was performed for all subjects. The diagnosis was confirmed by histology. Masson’s trichrome staining for collagen was performed and quantified.Results: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) for SWV was 3.44 ± 0.95 m/seconds (control group), 4.63 ± 1.45 m/seconds (adenomyosis group), and 4.53 ± 1.07 m/seconds (fibroid group). The mean SWV differed when comparing normal myometrium and adenomyosis after adjustments for age and endometrial pathology (P=0.019). The cut-off point of SWV at 3.465 m/seconds could differentiate adenomyosis from the normal uterus with an 80% sensitivity, 80% specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.93) (P<0.001). No significant difference in SWV between the adenomyosis and fibroid groups was detected.Conclusion: Shear wave elastography could be an alternative tool to distinguish between normal myometrium and adenomyosis; however, it could not differentiate adenomyosis from uterine fibroid or uterine fibroid from normal myometrium.https://www.ijfs.ir/article_247952_3122ad5b1207b7146985122196ab9cf4.pdfadenomyosiselasticityelasticity imaging techniquesleiomyomauterus
spellingShingle Sutee Pongpunprut
Panyu Paburana
Pornphan Wibulpolprasert
Wanwisa Waiyaput
Morakot Sroyraya
Tharintorn Chansoon
Areepan Sophonsritsuk
A Comparison of Shear Wave Elastography between Normal Myometrium, Uterine Fibroids, and Adenomyosis: A Cross-Sectional Study
International Journal of Fertility and Sterility
adenomyosis
elasticity
elasticity imaging techniques
leiomyoma
uterus
title A Comparison of Shear Wave Elastography between Normal Myometrium, Uterine Fibroids, and Adenomyosis: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full A Comparison of Shear Wave Elastography between Normal Myometrium, Uterine Fibroids, and Adenomyosis: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr A Comparison of Shear Wave Elastography between Normal Myometrium, Uterine Fibroids, and Adenomyosis: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Shear Wave Elastography between Normal Myometrium, Uterine Fibroids, and Adenomyosis: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short A Comparison of Shear Wave Elastography between Normal Myometrium, Uterine Fibroids, and Adenomyosis: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort comparison of shear wave elastography between normal myometrium uterine fibroids and adenomyosis a cross sectional study
topic adenomyosis
elasticity
elasticity imaging techniques
leiomyoma
uterus
url https://www.ijfs.ir/article_247952_3122ad5b1207b7146985122196ab9cf4.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT suteepongpunprut acomparisonofshearwaveelastographybetweennormalmyometriumuterinefibroidsandadenomyosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT panyupaburana acomparisonofshearwaveelastographybetweennormalmyometriumuterinefibroidsandadenomyosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT pornphanwibulpolprasert acomparisonofshearwaveelastographybetweennormalmyometriumuterinefibroidsandadenomyosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT wanwisawaiyaput acomparisonofshearwaveelastographybetweennormalmyometriumuterinefibroidsandadenomyosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT morakotsroyraya acomparisonofshearwaveelastographybetweennormalmyometriumuterinefibroidsandadenomyosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT tharintornchansoon acomparisonofshearwaveelastographybetweennormalmyometriumuterinefibroidsandadenomyosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT areepansophonsritsuk acomparisonofshearwaveelastographybetweennormalmyometriumuterinefibroidsandadenomyosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT suteepongpunprut comparisonofshearwaveelastographybetweennormalmyometriumuterinefibroidsandadenomyosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT panyupaburana comparisonofshearwaveelastographybetweennormalmyometriumuterinefibroidsandadenomyosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT pornphanwibulpolprasert comparisonofshearwaveelastographybetweennormalmyometriumuterinefibroidsandadenomyosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT wanwisawaiyaput comparisonofshearwaveelastographybetweennormalmyometriumuterinefibroidsandadenomyosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT morakotsroyraya comparisonofshearwaveelastographybetweennormalmyometriumuterinefibroidsandadenomyosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT tharintornchansoon comparisonofshearwaveelastographybetweennormalmyometriumuterinefibroidsandadenomyosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT areepansophonsritsuk comparisonofshearwaveelastographybetweennormalmyometriumuterinefibroidsandadenomyosisacrosssectionalstudy