Choosing to biopsy or refer suspicious melanocytic lesions in general practice

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>General practitioners (GPs) are involved in the management of most melanocytic skin lesions in Australia. A high quality biopsy technique is a crucial first step in management, as it is recognized that poor techniques can mislead, de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robison Sean, Kljakovic Marjan, Barry Peter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-08-01
Series:BMC Family Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/13/78
_version_ 1811227397053218816
author Robison Sean
Kljakovic Marjan
Barry Peter
author_facet Robison Sean
Kljakovic Marjan
Barry Peter
author_sort Robison Sean
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>General practitioners (GPs) are involved in the management of most melanocytic skin lesions in Australia. A high quality biopsy technique is a crucial first step in management, as it is recognized that poor techniques can mislead, delay, or miss a diagnosis of melanoma. There has been little published on the biopsy decisions and techniques of GPs. This study aims to describe the current management choices made by GPs for suspicious melanocytic skin lesions and to compare their choices with the best practice guidelines.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>An anonymous survey of GPs presented with three clinical scenarios with increasing complexity of melanoma in which a referral or biopsy decision was specified.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>391 mailed surveys with a 76.3% response rate. Mean biopsy experience was 4.14 biopsies per GP per month. The rates of choosing to refer among the three scenarios were 31%, 52% and 81% respectively, with referral to surgery being the most common choice (81%). Most biopsy techniques (55%) were chosen according to best practice guidelines, although non-guideline biopsy techniques chosen included shave (n = 10), punch biopsy (n = 57), wide excisions (n = 65), and flaps (n = 10). The few GPs (n = 5) who identified themselves as skin specialist GPs were no more likely to adhere to guidelines than their colleagues.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A majority of referrals and biopsies were chosen by GPs according to best practice guidelines, but concern remains for the high proportion of GPs making non-guideline based choices. How GPs choose to biopsy or refer needs further training, audit, and research if Australia is to improve the outcome of melanoma management in general practice.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-12T09:40:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-100c06e04052453ba940413243a8c602
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2296
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T09:40:42Z
publishDate 2012-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Family Practice
spelling doaj.art-100c06e04052453ba940413243a8c6022022-12-22T03:38:04ZengBMCBMC Family Practice1471-22962012-08-011317810.1186/1471-2296-13-78Choosing to biopsy or refer suspicious melanocytic lesions in general practiceRobison SeanKljakovic MarjanBarry Peter<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>General practitioners (GPs) are involved in the management of most melanocytic skin lesions in Australia. A high quality biopsy technique is a crucial first step in management, as it is recognized that poor techniques can mislead, delay, or miss a diagnosis of melanoma. There has been little published on the biopsy decisions and techniques of GPs. This study aims to describe the current management choices made by GPs for suspicious melanocytic skin lesions and to compare their choices with the best practice guidelines.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>An anonymous survey of GPs presented with three clinical scenarios with increasing complexity of melanoma in which a referral or biopsy decision was specified.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>391 mailed surveys with a 76.3% response rate. Mean biopsy experience was 4.14 biopsies per GP per month. The rates of choosing to refer among the three scenarios were 31%, 52% and 81% respectively, with referral to surgery being the most common choice (81%). Most biopsy techniques (55%) were chosen according to best practice guidelines, although non-guideline biopsy techniques chosen included shave (n = 10), punch biopsy (n = 57), wide excisions (n = 65), and flaps (n = 10). The few GPs (n = 5) who identified themselves as skin specialist GPs were no more likely to adhere to guidelines than their colleagues.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A majority of referrals and biopsies were chosen by GPs according to best practice guidelines, but concern remains for the high proportion of GPs making non-guideline based choices. How GPs choose to biopsy or refer needs further training, audit, and research if Australia is to improve the outcome of melanoma management in general practice.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/13/78BiopsyGeneral practiceGuidelinesMelanomaAudit
spellingShingle Robison Sean
Kljakovic Marjan
Barry Peter
Choosing to biopsy or refer suspicious melanocytic lesions in general practice
BMC Family Practice
Biopsy
General practice
Guidelines
Melanoma
Audit
title Choosing to biopsy or refer suspicious melanocytic lesions in general practice
title_full Choosing to biopsy or refer suspicious melanocytic lesions in general practice
title_fullStr Choosing to biopsy or refer suspicious melanocytic lesions in general practice
title_full_unstemmed Choosing to biopsy or refer suspicious melanocytic lesions in general practice
title_short Choosing to biopsy or refer suspicious melanocytic lesions in general practice
title_sort choosing to biopsy or refer suspicious melanocytic lesions in general practice
topic Biopsy
General practice
Guidelines
Melanoma
Audit
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/13/78
work_keys_str_mv AT robisonsean choosingtobiopsyorrefersuspiciousmelanocyticlesionsingeneralpractice
AT kljakovicmarjan choosingtobiopsyorrefersuspiciousmelanocyticlesionsingeneralpractice
AT barrypeter choosingtobiopsyorrefersuspiciousmelanocyticlesionsingeneralpractice