Comperative outcomes of the patients undergoing percutaneous and open trigger finger release
The aim of this study was to compare patients who underwent open or percutaneous trigger finger release in terms of clinical outcomes, time to return to activities, and recurrence. The records of patients who underwent percutaneous and open trigger finger release between 2012 and 2018 at two differe...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Society of Turaz Bilim
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Medicine Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=95199 |
| _version_ | 1797327818643734528 |
|---|---|
| author | Duran Toprak Fatih Dogar Burak Kuscu Ali AydIn Karadeniz Okkes Bilal |
| author_facet | Duran Toprak Fatih Dogar Burak Kuscu Ali AydIn Karadeniz Okkes Bilal |
| author_sort | Duran Toprak |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The aim of this study was to compare patients who underwent open or percutaneous trigger finger release in terms of clinical outcomes, time to return to activities, and recurrence. The records of patients who underwent percutaneous and open trigger finger release between 2012 and 2018 at two different hospitals in the same city were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: 33 patients who underwent percutaneous trigger finger release (Group PR) and 48 patients who underwent open release of A1 pulley (Group OR). The clinical classification of cases was done according to the Quinnell classification. The functional outcomes of the patients were evaluated according to the Quick DASH scale. The mean age of the patients was 55.95 ± 11.73 (2782) years; 71.6% (n = 58) were female. The left side was involved in 56.8% (n = 46) patients, and 81 patients underwent percutaneous or open trigger finger release with a mean follow-up duration of 37.40 ± 16.22 (1272) months. The time to start daily activities was shorter in Group PR than in Group OR, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). A comparison of the upper extremity functional scores between the two groups revealed no statistically significant difference (PR; 15.21 ± 6.17, PO; 12.99 ± 6.89, p = 0.142). Although the rate of complications was higher in Group OR, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (PR; 12.12%, PO: 20.83%, p = 0.217). Percutaneous trigger finger release can be preferred in adult trigger finger surgery due to increased risks regarding wound healing and infections associated with advanced age, presence of diabetes and inflammatory arthritis, and the expectation of rapid return to daily activities. [Med-Science 2020; 9(4.000): 950-3] |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T06:42:54Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-100fe0e4587f47229994f650cefc933d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2147-0634 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T06:42:54Z |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | Society of Turaz Bilim |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Medicine Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-100fe0e4587f47229994f650cefc933d2024-02-03T08:19:14ZengSociety of Turaz BilimMedicine Science2147-06342020-12-0194950310.5455/medscience.2020.07.12995199Comperative outcomes of the patients undergoing percutaneous and open trigger finger releaseDuran Toprak0Fatih Dogar1Burak Kuscu2Ali AydIn Karadeniz3Okkes Bilal4Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Kahramanmaras, Turkey Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Kahramanmaras, Turkey. Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Kahramanmaras, Turkey Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Kahramanmaras, Turkey Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Kahramanmaras, TurkeyThe aim of this study was to compare patients who underwent open or percutaneous trigger finger release in terms of clinical outcomes, time to return to activities, and recurrence. The records of patients who underwent percutaneous and open trigger finger release between 2012 and 2018 at two different hospitals in the same city were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: 33 patients who underwent percutaneous trigger finger release (Group PR) and 48 patients who underwent open release of A1 pulley (Group OR). The clinical classification of cases was done according to the Quinnell classification. The functional outcomes of the patients were evaluated according to the Quick DASH scale. The mean age of the patients was 55.95 ± 11.73 (2782) years; 71.6% (n = 58) were female. The left side was involved in 56.8% (n = 46) patients, and 81 patients underwent percutaneous or open trigger finger release with a mean follow-up duration of 37.40 ± 16.22 (1272) months. The time to start daily activities was shorter in Group PR than in Group OR, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). A comparison of the upper extremity functional scores between the two groups revealed no statistically significant difference (PR; 15.21 ± 6.17, PO; 12.99 ± 6.89, p = 0.142). Although the rate of complications was higher in Group OR, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (PR; 12.12%, PO: 20.83%, p = 0.217). Percutaneous trigger finger release can be preferred in adult trigger finger surgery due to increased risks regarding wound healing and infections associated with advanced age, presence of diabetes and inflammatory arthritis, and the expectation of rapid return to daily activities. [Med-Science 2020; 9(4.000): 950-3]http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=95199trigger fingerpercutaneous releaseopen release |
| spellingShingle | Duran Toprak Fatih Dogar Burak Kuscu Ali AydIn Karadeniz Okkes Bilal Comperative outcomes of the patients undergoing percutaneous and open trigger finger release Medicine Science trigger finger percutaneous release open release |
| title | Comperative outcomes of the patients undergoing percutaneous and open trigger finger release |
| title_full | Comperative outcomes of the patients undergoing percutaneous and open trigger finger release |
| title_fullStr | Comperative outcomes of the patients undergoing percutaneous and open trigger finger release |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comperative outcomes of the patients undergoing percutaneous and open trigger finger release |
| title_short | Comperative outcomes of the patients undergoing percutaneous and open trigger finger release |
| title_sort | comperative outcomes of the patients undergoing percutaneous and open trigger finger release |
| topic | trigger finger percutaneous release open release |
| url | http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=95199 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT durantoprak comperativeoutcomesofthepatientsundergoingpercutaneousandopentriggerfingerrelease AT fatihdogar comperativeoutcomesofthepatientsundergoingpercutaneousandopentriggerfingerrelease AT burakkuscu comperativeoutcomesofthepatientsundergoingpercutaneousandopentriggerfingerrelease AT aliaydinkaradeniz comperativeoutcomesofthepatientsundergoingpercutaneousandopentriggerfingerrelease AT okkesbilal comperativeoutcomesofthepatientsundergoingpercutaneousandopentriggerfingerrelease |