Comparison of endoscopic bilateral areolar and robotic-assisted bilateral axillo-breast approach thyroidectomy in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background Robot-assisted and endoscopic thyroidectomy are superior to conventional open thyroidectomy in improving cosmetic outcomes and postoperative quality of life. The procedure of these thyroidectomies was similar in terms of surgical view, feasibility, and invasiveness. However, it r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaokang Fu, Yunhan Ma, Yiqi Hou, Yuan Liu, Luming Zheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-11-01
Series:BMC Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02250-w
_version_ 1797630424753635328
author Xiaokang Fu
Yunhan Ma
Yiqi Hou
Yuan Liu
Luming Zheng
author_facet Xiaokang Fu
Yunhan Ma
Yiqi Hou
Yuan Liu
Luming Zheng
author_sort Xiaokang Fu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Robot-assisted and endoscopic thyroidectomy are superior to conventional open thyroidectomy in improving cosmetic outcomes and postoperative quality of life. The procedure of these thyroidectomies was similar in terms of surgical view, feasibility, and invasiveness. However, it remains uncertain whether the robotic-assisted bilateral axilla-breast approach (BABA) was superior to the endoscopic bilateral areolar approach (BAA) thyroidectomy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefit of these two surgical procedures to evaluate the difference between these two surgical procedures by comparing the pathological and surgical outcomes of endoscopic BAA and robotic-assisted BABA thyroidectomy in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Methods From November 2018 to September 2021, 278 patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma underwent BABA robot-assisted, and 49 underwent BAA approach endoscopic thyroidectomy. Of these patients, we analyzed 42 and 135 patients of endoscopic and robotic matched pairs using 1:4 propensity score matching and retrospective cohort study methods. These two groups were retrospectively compared by surgical outcomes, clinicopathological characteristics, and postoperative complications. Results The mean operation time was significantly longer in the EG than in the RG (p < 0.001), The number of retrieved lymph nodes was significantly lower in the ET group than in the RT group (p < 0.001). The mean maximum diameter of the thyroid was more expansive in the EG than in the RG (p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the total drainage amount and drain insertion days between the two groups (p = 0.241, p = 0.316, respectively). Both groups showed that cosmetic satisfaction (p = 0.837) and pain score (p = 0.077) were similar. There were no significant differences in complication frequencies. Conclusion Robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy are similar minimally invasive thyroid surgeries, each with its advantages, both of which can achieve the expected surgical outcomes. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T11:08:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1010dde461d442159a4079d0c7374586
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2482
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T11:08:07Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Surgery
spelling doaj.art-1010dde461d442159a4079d0c73745862023-11-12T12:05:06ZengBMCBMC Surgery1471-24822023-11-0123111010.1186/s12893-023-02250-wComparison of endoscopic bilateral areolar and robotic-assisted bilateral axillo-breast approach thyroidectomy in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a propensity-matched retrospective cohort studyXiaokang Fu0Yunhan Ma1Yiqi Hou2Yuan Liu3Luming Zheng4Jinzhou Medical UniversityDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, the 960th Hospital of People’s Liberation ArmyJinzhou Medical UniversityJinzhou Medical UniversityDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, the 960th Hospital of People’s Liberation ArmyAbstract Background Robot-assisted and endoscopic thyroidectomy are superior to conventional open thyroidectomy in improving cosmetic outcomes and postoperative quality of life. The procedure of these thyroidectomies was similar in terms of surgical view, feasibility, and invasiveness. However, it remains uncertain whether the robotic-assisted bilateral axilla-breast approach (BABA) was superior to the endoscopic bilateral areolar approach (BAA) thyroidectomy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefit of these two surgical procedures to evaluate the difference between these two surgical procedures by comparing the pathological and surgical outcomes of endoscopic BAA and robotic-assisted BABA thyroidectomy in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Methods From November 2018 to September 2021, 278 patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma underwent BABA robot-assisted, and 49 underwent BAA approach endoscopic thyroidectomy. Of these patients, we analyzed 42 and 135 patients of endoscopic and robotic matched pairs using 1:4 propensity score matching and retrospective cohort study methods. These two groups were retrospectively compared by surgical outcomes, clinicopathological characteristics, and postoperative complications. Results The mean operation time was significantly longer in the EG than in the RG (p < 0.001), The number of retrieved lymph nodes was significantly lower in the ET group than in the RT group (p < 0.001). The mean maximum diameter of the thyroid was more expansive in the EG than in the RG (p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the total drainage amount and drain insertion days between the two groups (p = 0.241, p = 0.316, respectively). Both groups showed that cosmetic satisfaction (p = 0.837) and pain score (p = 0.077) were similar. There were no significant differences in complication frequencies. Conclusion Robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy are similar minimally invasive thyroid surgeries, each with its advantages, both of which can achieve the expected surgical outcomes. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02250-wDifferentiated thyroid carcinomaBilateral axillo-breast approach robotic-assisted thyroidectomyEndoscopic bilateral areolar approachPropensity score-matched
spellingShingle Xiaokang Fu
Yunhan Ma
Yiqi Hou
Yuan Liu
Luming Zheng
Comparison of endoscopic bilateral areolar and robotic-assisted bilateral axillo-breast approach thyroidectomy in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study
BMC Surgery
Differentiated thyroid carcinoma
Bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic-assisted thyroidectomy
Endoscopic bilateral areolar approach
Propensity score-matched
title Comparison of endoscopic bilateral areolar and robotic-assisted bilateral axillo-breast approach thyroidectomy in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study
title_full Comparison of endoscopic bilateral areolar and robotic-assisted bilateral axillo-breast approach thyroidectomy in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Comparison of endoscopic bilateral areolar and robotic-assisted bilateral axillo-breast approach thyroidectomy in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of endoscopic bilateral areolar and robotic-assisted bilateral axillo-breast approach thyroidectomy in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study
title_short Comparison of endoscopic bilateral areolar and robotic-assisted bilateral axillo-breast approach thyroidectomy in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study
title_sort comparison of endoscopic bilateral areolar and robotic assisted bilateral axillo breast approach thyroidectomy in differentiated thyroid carcinoma a propensity matched retrospective cohort study
topic Differentiated thyroid carcinoma
Bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic-assisted thyroidectomy
Endoscopic bilateral areolar approach
Propensity score-matched
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02250-w
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaokangfu comparisonofendoscopicbilateralareolarandroboticassistedbilateralaxillobreastapproachthyroidectomyindifferentiatedthyroidcarcinomaapropensitymatchedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yunhanma comparisonofendoscopicbilateralareolarandroboticassistedbilateralaxillobreastapproachthyroidectomyindifferentiatedthyroidcarcinomaapropensitymatchedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yiqihou comparisonofendoscopicbilateralareolarandroboticassistedbilateralaxillobreastapproachthyroidectomyindifferentiatedthyroidcarcinomaapropensitymatchedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yuanliu comparisonofendoscopicbilateralareolarandroboticassistedbilateralaxillobreastapproachthyroidectomyindifferentiatedthyroidcarcinomaapropensitymatchedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lumingzheng comparisonofendoscopicbilateralareolarandroboticassistedbilateralaxillobreastapproachthyroidectomyindifferentiatedthyroidcarcinomaapropensitymatchedretrospectivecohortstudy