Traditional ecological knowledge sustains due to poverty and lack of choices rather than thinking about the environment
Abstract In this debate article, we have tried to discuss Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) and its close link to the available resources and lack of options in the indigenous communities. We came across the article of Hartel et al. where they initiated a discussion on this important but debata...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00640-1 |
| _version_ | 1797376818090606592 |
|---|---|
| author | Abdullah Abdullah Shujaul Mulk Khan |
| author_facet | Abdullah Abdullah Shujaul Mulk Khan |
| author_sort | Abdullah Abdullah |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract In this debate article, we have tried to discuss Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) and its close link to the available resources and lack of options in the indigenous communities. We came across the article of Hartel et al. where they initiated a discussion on this important but debatable topic of TEK and its merits and demirits for the environment. We believe that this discourse could continue to clarify both sides of the picture. Our research group is working on species facing extinction threats due to extensive utilization, leading to overexploitation of the taxa, which the TEK seldom cares for. We are of the opinion that the marginalized tribal communities living around the globe extensively use some of the species and natural resources for their food, fodder, fiber, shelter, energy, health and other benefits, irrespective of their conservation needs, and many other ecosystem services. They have to sustain their basic live’s needs from the resources available for their livelihood. They collect economically important medicinal and other species in large quantities to gain higher earnings, rather than thinking of the issues faced by them. Hence, we believe that the continuity and utilization of TEK are driven by poverty and lack of choices rather than positive environmental values, historically. Nevertheless, those communities sometimes have their local system of protection which sometimes works very well or otherwise with the passage of time and the formation of government-driven regulations in the recent past, TEK itself has lost its real sense especially, related to conservation and management. Therefore, TEK could be linked with existing research-based policies and regulations for long-lasting benefits to the environment and its sustainable future. Such bridging can benifit all the stake hoders—the TEK holders, regulatory bodies, government agencies and many more. This debate can lead to a positive and critical discourse towards the clarification of the conundrum under consideration as well as creation of more questions hyptheses related to TEK. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T19:44:05Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1011ae785ca7473bbf27de3a7977eb68 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1746-4269 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T19:44:05Z |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine |
| spelling | doaj.art-1011ae785ca7473bbf27de3a7977eb682023-12-24T12:26:44ZengBMCJournal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine1746-42692023-12-011911610.1186/s13002-023-00640-1Traditional ecological knowledge sustains due to poverty and lack of choices rather than thinking about the environmentAbdullah Abdullah0Shujaul Mulk Khan1Department of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University IslamabadDepartment of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University IslamabadAbstract In this debate article, we have tried to discuss Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) and its close link to the available resources and lack of options in the indigenous communities. We came across the article of Hartel et al. where they initiated a discussion on this important but debatable topic of TEK and its merits and demirits for the environment. We believe that this discourse could continue to clarify both sides of the picture. Our research group is working on species facing extinction threats due to extensive utilization, leading to overexploitation of the taxa, which the TEK seldom cares for. We are of the opinion that the marginalized tribal communities living around the globe extensively use some of the species and natural resources for their food, fodder, fiber, shelter, energy, health and other benefits, irrespective of their conservation needs, and many other ecosystem services. They have to sustain their basic live’s needs from the resources available for their livelihood. They collect economically important medicinal and other species in large quantities to gain higher earnings, rather than thinking of the issues faced by them. Hence, we believe that the continuity and utilization of TEK are driven by poverty and lack of choices rather than positive environmental values, historically. Nevertheless, those communities sometimes have their local system of protection which sometimes works very well or otherwise with the passage of time and the formation of government-driven regulations in the recent past, TEK itself has lost its real sense especially, related to conservation and management. Therefore, TEK could be linked with existing research-based policies and regulations for long-lasting benefits to the environment and its sustainable future. Such bridging can benifit all the stake hoders—the TEK holders, regulatory bodies, government agencies and many more. This debate can lead to a positive and critical discourse towards the clarification of the conundrum under consideration as well as creation of more questions hyptheses related to TEK.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00640-1ConservationExtinctionLack of resourcesMarginalized tribal communitiesMedicinal and multiprupose utilizationsSustainability |
| spellingShingle | Abdullah Abdullah Shujaul Mulk Khan Traditional ecological knowledge sustains due to poverty and lack of choices rather than thinking about the environment Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine Conservation Extinction Lack of resources Marginalized tribal communities Medicinal and multiprupose utilizations Sustainability |
| title | Traditional ecological knowledge sustains due to poverty and lack of choices rather than thinking about the environment |
| title_full | Traditional ecological knowledge sustains due to poverty and lack of choices rather than thinking about the environment |
| title_fullStr | Traditional ecological knowledge sustains due to poverty and lack of choices rather than thinking about the environment |
| title_full_unstemmed | Traditional ecological knowledge sustains due to poverty and lack of choices rather than thinking about the environment |
| title_short | Traditional ecological knowledge sustains due to poverty and lack of choices rather than thinking about the environment |
| title_sort | traditional ecological knowledge sustains due to poverty and lack of choices rather than thinking about the environment |
| topic | Conservation Extinction Lack of resources Marginalized tribal communities Medicinal and multiprupose utilizations Sustainability |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00640-1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT abdullahabdullah traditionalecologicalknowledgesustainsduetopovertyandlackofchoicesratherthanthinkingabouttheenvironment AT shujaulmulkkhan traditionalecologicalknowledgesustainsduetopovertyandlackofchoicesratherthanthinkingabouttheenvironment |