Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy (PMRT) before and after 2-Stage Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
<i>Background</i>: In those undergoing treatment for breast cancer, evidence has demonstrated a significant improvement in survival, and a reduction in the risk of local recurrence in patients who undergo postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). There is uncertainty about the optimal tim...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Medicina |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/55/6/226 |
_version_ | 1797717105812963328 |
---|---|
author | Jeremie D. Oliver Daniel Boczar Maria T. Huayllani David J. Restrepo Andrea Sisti Oscar J. Manrique Peter Niclas Broer Sarah McLaughlin Brian D. Rinker Antonio Jorge Forte |
author_facet | Jeremie D. Oliver Daniel Boczar Maria T. Huayllani David J. Restrepo Andrea Sisti Oscar J. Manrique Peter Niclas Broer Sarah McLaughlin Brian D. Rinker Antonio Jorge Forte |
author_sort | Jeremie D. Oliver |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <i>Background</i>: In those undergoing treatment for breast cancer, evidence has demonstrated a significant improvement in survival, and a reduction in the risk of local recurrence in patients who undergo postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). There is uncertainty about the optimal timing of PMRT, whether it should be before or after tissue expander or permanent implant placement. This study aimed to summarize the data reported in the literature on the effect of the timing of PMRT, both preceding and following 2-stage expander-implant breast reconstruction (IBR), and to statistically analyze the impact of timing on infection rates and the need for explantation. <i>Methods</i>: A comprehensive systematic review of the literature was conducted using the PubMed/Medline, Ovid, and Cochrane databases without timeframe limitations. Articles included in the analysis were those reporting outcomes data of PMRT in IBR published from 2009 to 2017. Chi-square statistical analysis was performed to compare infection and explantation rates between the two subgroups at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <i>Results</i>: A total of 11 studies met the inclusion criteria for this study. These studies reported outcomes data for 1565 total 2-stage expander-IBR procedures, where PMRT was used (1145 before, and 420 after, implant placement). There was a statistically significant higher likelihood of infection following pre-implant placement PMRT (21.03%, <i>p</i> = 0.000079), compared to PMRT after implant placement (9.69%). There was no difference in the rate of explantation between pre-implant placement PMRT (12.93%) and postimplant placement PMRT (11.43%). <i>Conclusion</i>: This study suggests that patients receiving PMRT before implant placement in 2-stage expander−implant based reconstruction may have a higher risk of developing an infection. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T08:31:29Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-1018e3d4a49e4920b21617d6cf7ef7e2 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1010-660X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T08:31:29Z |
publishDate | 2019-05-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Medicina |
spelling | doaj.art-1018e3d4a49e4920b21617d6cf7ef7e22023-09-02T17:33:22ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X2019-05-0155622610.3390/medicina55060226medicina55060226Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy (PMRT) before and after 2-Stage Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic ReviewJeremie D. Oliver0Daniel Boczar1Maria T. Huayllani2David J. Restrepo3Andrea Sisti4Oscar J. Manrique5Peter Niclas Broer6Sarah McLaughlin7Brian D. Rinker8Antonio Jorge Forte9Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USADivision of Plastic Surgery and Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USADivision of Plastic Surgery and Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USADivision of Plastic Surgery and Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USADivision of Plastic Surgery and Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USADivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USADepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Bogenhausen Academic Hospital, 81925 Munich, GermanyDivision of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USADivision of Plastic Surgery and Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USADivision of Plastic Surgery and Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA<i>Background</i>: In those undergoing treatment for breast cancer, evidence has demonstrated a significant improvement in survival, and a reduction in the risk of local recurrence in patients who undergo postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). There is uncertainty about the optimal timing of PMRT, whether it should be before or after tissue expander or permanent implant placement. This study aimed to summarize the data reported in the literature on the effect of the timing of PMRT, both preceding and following 2-stage expander-implant breast reconstruction (IBR), and to statistically analyze the impact of timing on infection rates and the need for explantation. <i>Methods</i>: A comprehensive systematic review of the literature was conducted using the PubMed/Medline, Ovid, and Cochrane databases without timeframe limitations. Articles included in the analysis were those reporting outcomes data of PMRT in IBR published from 2009 to 2017. Chi-square statistical analysis was performed to compare infection and explantation rates between the two subgroups at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <i>Results</i>: A total of 11 studies met the inclusion criteria for this study. These studies reported outcomes data for 1565 total 2-stage expander-IBR procedures, where PMRT was used (1145 before, and 420 after, implant placement). There was a statistically significant higher likelihood of infection following pre-implant placement PMRT (21.03%, <i>p</i> = 0.000079), compared to PMRT after implant placement (9.69%). There was no difference in the rate of explantation between pre-implant placement PMRT (12.93%) and postimplant placement PMRT (11.43%). <i>Conclusion</i>: This study suggests that patients receiving PMRT before implant placement in 2-stage expander−implant based reconstruction may have a higher risk of developing an infection.https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/55/6/226postmastectomy radiation therapyPMRTimplant-based reconstructionbreast implantradiationbreast cancerbreast reconstructioninfectionexplantation |
spellingShingle | Jeremie D. Oliver Daniel Boczar Maria T. Huayllani David J. Restrepo Andrea Sisti Oscar J. Manrique Peter Niclas Broer Sarah McLaughlin Brian D. Rinker Antonio Jorge Forte Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy (PMRT) before and after 2-Stage Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Medicina postmastectomy radiation therapy PMRT implant-based reconstruction breast implant radiation breast cancer breast reconstruction infection explantation |
title | Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy (PMRT) before and after 2-Stage Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy (PMRT) before and after 2-Stage Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy (PMRT) before and after 2-Stage Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy (PMRT) before and after 2-Stage Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy (PMRT) before and after 2-Stage Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | postmastectomy radiation therapy pmrt before and after 2 stage expander implant breast reconstruction a systematic review |
topic | postmastectomy radiation therapy PMRT implant-based reconstruction breast implant radiation breast cancer breast reconstruction infection explantation |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/55/6/226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeremiedoliver postmastectomyradiationtherapypmrtbeforeandafter2stageexpanderimplantbreastreconstructionasystematicreview AT danielboczar postmastectomyradiationtherapypmrtbeforeandafter2stageexpanderimplantbreastreconstructionasystematicreview AT mariathuayllani postmastectomyradiationtherapypmrtbeforeandafter2stageexpanderimplantbreastreconstructionasystematicreview AT davidjrestrepo postmastectomyradiationtherapypmrtbeforeandafter2stageexpanderimplantbreastreconstructionasystematicreview AT andreasisti postmastectomyradiationtherapypmrtbeforeandafter2stageexpanderimplantbreastreconstructionasystematicreview AT oscarjmanrique postmastectomyradiationtherapypmrtbeforeandafter2stageexpanderimplantbreastreconstructionasystematicreview AT peterniclasbroer postmastectomyradiationtherapypmrtbeforeandafter2stageexpanderimplantbreastreconstructionasystematicreview AT sarahmclaughlin postmastectomyradiationtherapypmrtbeforeandafter2stageexpanderimplantbreastreconstructionasystematicreview AT briandrinker postmastectomyradiationtherapypmrtbeforeandafter2stageexpanderimplantbreastreconstructionasystematicreview AT antoniojorgeforte postmastectomyradiationtherapypmrtbeforeandafter2stageexpanderimplantbreastreconstructionasystematicreview |