Outpatient intravenous diuresis in a rural setting: safety, efficacy, and outcomes

PurposeTo evaluate the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of outpatient intravenous diuresis in a rural setting and compare it to urban outcomes.MethodsA single-center study was conducted on 60 patients (131 visits) at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC) from 1/2021–12/2022. Demographics, visi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Girish Pathangey, Susan P D’Anna, Rohitha A. Moudgal, David B. Min, Katharine A. Manning, Cynthia C. Taub, Lauren G. Gilstrap
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1155957/full
_version_ 1797820491779538944
author Girish Pathangey
Susan P D’Anna
Rohitha A. Moudgal
David B. Min
Katharine A. Manning
Cynthia C. Taub
Lauren G. Gilstrap
author_facet Girish Pathangey
Susan P D’Anna
Rohitha A. Moudgal
David B. Min
Katharine A. Manning
Cynthia C. Taub
Lauren G. Gilstrap
author_sort Girish Pathangey
collection DOAJ
description PurposeTo evaluate the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of outpatient intravenous diuresis in a rural setting and compare it to urban outcomes.MethodsA single-center study was conducted on 60 patients (131 visits) at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC) from 1/2021–12/2022. Demographics, visit data, and outcomes were collected and compared to urban outpatient IV centers, and inpatient HF hospitalizations from DHMC FY21 and national means. Descriptive statistics, T-tests and chi-squares were used.ResultsThe mean age was 70 ± 13 years, 58% were male, and 83% were NYHA III-IV. Post-diuresis, 5% had mild-moderate hypokalemia, 16% had mild worsening of renal function, and 3% had severe worsening of renal function. No hospitalizations occurred due to adverse events. The mean infusion-visit urine output was 761 ± 521 ml, and post-visit weight loss was −3.9 ± 5.0 kg. No significant differences were observed between HFpEF and HFrEF groups. 30-day readmissions were similar to urban outpatient IV centers, DHMC FY21, and the national mean (23.3% vs. 23.5% vs. 22.2% vs. 22.6%, respectively; p = 0.949). 30-day mortality was similar to urban outpatient IV centers but lower than DHMC FY21 and the national means (1.7% vs. 2.5% vs. 12.3% vs. 10.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). At 60 days, 42% of patients had ≥1 clinic revisit, 41% had ≥1 infusion revisit, 33% were readmitted to the hospital, and two deaths occurred. The clinic avoided 21 hospitalizations, resulting in estimated cost savings of $426,111.ConclusionOP IV diuresis appears safe and effective for rural HF patients, potentially decreasing mortality rates and healthcare expenses while mitigating rural-urban disparities.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T09:39:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-101a81f61986488298f4379285aa2e27
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T09:39:05Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-101a81f61986488298f4379285aa2e272023-05-25T04:29:18ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2023-05-011010.3389/fcvm.2023.11559571155957Outpatient intravenous diuresis in a rural setting: safety, efficacy, and outcomesGirish Pathangey0Susan P D’Anna1Rohitha A. Moudgal2David B. Min3Katharine A. Manning4Cynthia C. Taub5Lauren G. Gilstrap6Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New HampshireHeart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New HampshireDepartment of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New HampshireHeart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New HampshireHeart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New HampshireHeart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New HampshireHeart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New HampshirePurposeTo evaluate the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of outpatient intravenous diuresis in a rural setting and compare it to urban outcomes.MethodsA single-center study was conducted on 60 patients (131 visits) at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC) from 1/2021–12/2022. Demographics, visit data, and outcomes were collected and compared to urban outpatient IV centers, and inpatient HF hospitalizations from DHMC FY21 and national means. Descriptive statistics, T-tests and chi-squares were used.ResultsThe mean age was 70 ± 13 years, 58% were male, and 83% were NYHA III-IV. Post-diuresis, 5% had mild-moderate hypokalemia, 16% had mild worsening of renal function, and 3% had severe worsening of renal function. No hospitalizations occurred due to adverse events. The mean infusion-visit urine output was 761 ± 521 ml, and post-visit weight loss was −3.9 ± 5.0 kg. No significant differences were observed between HFpEF and HFrEF groups. 30-day readmissions were similar to urban outpatient IV centers, DHMC FY21, and the national mean (23.3% vs. 23.5% vs. 22.2% vs. 22.6%, respectively; p = 0.949). 30-day mortality was similar to urban outpatient IV centers but lower than DHMC FY21 and the national means (1.7% vs. 2.5% vs. 12.3% vs. 10.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). At 60 days, 42% of patients had ≥1 clinic revisit, 41% had ≥1 infusion revisit, 33% were readmitted to the hospital, and two deaths occurred. The clinic avoided 21 hospitalizations, resulting in estimated cost savings of $426,111.ConclusionOP IV diuresis appears safe and effective for rural HF patients, potentially decreasing mortality rates and healthcare expenses while mitigating rural-urban disparities.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1155957/fullrural-urbanheart failurerural healthruralityhealth disparitiesdiuresis clinic
spellingShingle Girish Pathangey
Susan P D’Anna
Rohitha A. Moudgal
David B. Min
Katharine A. Manning
Cynthia C. Taub
Lauren G. Gilstrap
Outpatient intravenous diuresis in a rural setting: safety, efficacy, and outcomes
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
rural-urban
heart failure
rural health
rurality
health disparities
diuresis clinic
title Outpatient intravenous diuresis in a rural setting: safety, efficacy, and outcomes
title_full Outpatient intravenous diuresis in a rural setting: safety, efficacy, and outcomes
title_fullStr Outpatient intravenous diuresis in a rural setting: safety, efficacy, and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Outpatient intravenous diuresis in a rural setting: safety, efficacy, and outcomes
title_short Outpatient intravenous diuresis in a rural setting: safety, efficacy, and outcomes
title_sort outpatient intravenous diuresis in a rural setting safety efficacy and outcomes
topic rural-urban
heart failure
rural health
rurality
health disparities
diuresis clinic
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1155957/full
work_keys_str_mv AT girishpathangey outpatientintravenousdiuresisinaruralsettingsafetyefficacyandoutcomes
AT susanpdanna outpatientintravenousdiuresisinaruralsettingsafetyefficacyandoutcomes
AT rohithaamoudgal outpatientintravenousdiuresisinaruralsettingsafetyefficacyandoutcomes
AT davidbmin outpatientintravenousdiuresisinaruralsettingsafetyefficacyandoutcomes
AT katharineamanning outpatientintravenousdiuresisinaruralsettingsafetyefficacyandoutcomes
AT cynthiactaub outpatientintravenousdiuresisinaruralsettingsafetyefficacyandoutcomes
AT laurenggilstrap outpatientintravenousdiuresisinaruralsettingsafetyefficacyandoutcomes