Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Fibroblast Proliferation Following Platelet Electrostimulation

The increasing use of activated platelet rich plasma (PRP), or platelet gel, for wound healing has highlighted the disadvantages of using bovine thrombin (BT), an animal derived platelet activator, including high cost and antibody stimulation. This has motivated the exploration of direct (conductive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jason Castle, Allen L. Garner, Reginald D. Smith, Brian M. Davis, Steve Klopman, Sean R. Dinn, Andrew S. Torres, V. Bogdan Neculaes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2018-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8478267/
_version_ 1818876808159821824
author Jason Castle
Allen L. Garner
Reginald D. Smith
Brian M. Davis
Steve Klopman
Sean R. Dinn
Andrew S. Torres
V. Bogdan Neculaes
author_facet Jason Castle
Allen L. Garner
Reginald D. Smith
Brian M. Davis
Steve Klopman
Sean R. Dinn
Andrew S. Torres
V. Bogdan Neculaes
author_sort Jason Castle
collection DOAJ
description The increasing use of activated platelet rich plasma (PRP), or platelet gel, for wound healing has highlighted the disadvantages of using bovine thrombin (BT), an animal derived platelet activator, including high cost and antibody stimulation. This has motivated the exploration of direct (conductive coupling) and indirect (capacitive coupling) electrostimulation for <i>ex vivo</i> PRP activation to similar levels as BT in terms of growth factor release. PRP is a complex biological matrix comprising other blood cell types besides platelets. This paper assesses the impact of electrostimulation on other blood cells, specifically hematopoietic stem cells and fibroblasts. Capacitive coupling induces similar levels of cell viability and proliferation as BT 14 days following electrostimulation, while conductive coupling induces lower viability and proliferation. This indicates the potential tunability of electrostimulation to achieve equivalent efficacy as BT without the associated disadvantages and motivates future experiments to assess the implications on <i>in vivo</i> wound healing.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T13:48:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-101ea7fe452e4a4ea3856924ddeb6820
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2169-3536
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T13:48:16Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher IEEE
record_format Article
series IEEE Access
spelling doaj.art-101ea7fe452e4a4ea3856924ddeb68202022-12-21T20:18:49ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362018-01-016563955640110.1109/ACCESS.2018.28729308478267Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Fibroblast Proliferation Following Platelet ElectrostimulationJason Castle0Allen L. Garner1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5416-7437Reginald D. Smith2Brian M. Davis3Steve Klopman4Sean R. Dinn5Andrew S. Torres6V. Bogdan Neculaes7GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY, USASchool of Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USAGE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY, USAGE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY, USAGE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY, USAGE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY, USAGE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY, USAGE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY, USAThe increasing use of activated platelet rich plasma (PRP), or platelet gel, for wound healing has highlighted the disadvantages of using bovine thrombin (BT), an animal derived platelet activator, including high cost and antibody stimulation. This has motivated the exploration of direct (conductive coupling) and indirect (capacitive coupling) electrostimulation for <i>ex vivo</i> PRP activation to similar levels as BT in terms of growth factor release. PRP is a complex biological matrix comprising other blood cell types besides platelets. This paper assesses the impact of electrostimulation on other blood cells, specifically hematopoietic stem cells and fibroblasts. Capacitive coupling induces similar levels of cell viability and proliferation as BT 14 days following electrostimulation, while conductive coupling induces lower viability and proliferation. This indicates the potential tunability of electrostimulation to achieve equivalent efficacy as BT without the associated disadvantages and motivates future experiments to assess the implications on <i>in vivo</i> wound healing.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8478267/Bioelectric phenomenastem cellsbiological cellsplatelet activationelectroporation
spellingShingle Jason Castle
Allen L. Garner
Reginald D. Smith
Brian M. Davis
Steve Klopman
Sean R. Dinn
Andrew S. Torres
V. Bogdan Neculaes
Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Fibroblast Proliferation Following Platelet Electrostimulation
IEEE Access
Bioelectric phenomena
stem cells
biological cells
platelet activation
electroporation
title Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Fibroblast Proliferation Following Platelet Electrostimulation
title_full Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Fibroblast Proliferation Following Platelet Electrostimulation
title_fullStr Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Fibroblast Proliferation Following Platelet Electrostimulation
title_full_unstemmed Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Fibroblast Proliferation Following Platelet Electrostimulation
title_short Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Fibroblast Proliferation Following Platelet Electrostimulation
title_sort hematopoietic stem cell and fibroblast proliferation following platelet electrostimulation
topic Bioelectric phenomena
stem cells
biological cells
platelet activation
electroporation
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8478267/
work_keys_str_mv AT jasoncastle hematopoieticstemcellandfibroblastproliferationfollowingplateletelectrostimulation
AT allenlgarner hematopoieticstemcellandfibroblastproliferationfollowingplateletelectrostimulation
AT reginalddsmith hematopoieticstemcellandfibroblastproliferationfollowingplateletelectrostimulation
AT brianmdavis hematopoieticstemcellandfibroblastproliferationfollowingplateletelectrostimulation
AT steveklopman hematopoieticstemcellandfibroblastproliferationfollowingplateletelectrostimulation
AT seanrdinn hematopoieticstemcellandfibroblastproliferationfollowingplateletelectrostimulation
AT andrewstorres hematopoieticstemcellandfibroblastproliferationfollowingplateletelectrostimulation
AT vbogdanneculaes hematopoieticstemcellandfibroblastproliferationfollowingplateletelectrostimulation