Balancing wildlife protection and wildfire threat mitigation using a network optimization approach

In boreal forests of North America, land managers often carry out preventive treatments of forest fuel for the protection of human infrastructure from wildfires. However, these treatments may negatively affect other ecosystem services, such as the capacity to sustain wildlife populations. Here, we e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Denys Yemshanov, Denyse A. Dawe, Amanda Bakalarczyk, Ning Liu, Yan Boulanger, Jonathan Boucher, Alexandre Beauchemin, Dominique Arseneault, Mathieu Leblond, Marc-André Parisien
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1186616/full
_version_ 1827894378592468992
author Denys Yemshanov
Denyse A. Dawe
Amanda Bakalarczyk
Ning Liu
Yan Boulanger
Jonathan Boucher
Alexandre Beauchemin
Dominique Arseneault
Mathieu Leblond
Marc-André Parisien
author_facet Denys Yemshanov
Denyse A. Dawe
Amanda Bakalarczyk
Ning Liu
Yan Boulanger
Jonathan Boucher
Alexandre Beauchemin
Dominique Arseneault
Mathieu Leblond
Marc-André Parisien
author_sort Denys Yemshanov
collection DOAJ
description In boreal forests of North America, land managers often carry out preventive treatments of forest fuel for the protection of human infrastructure from wildfires. However, these treatments may negatively affect other ecosystem services, such as the capacity to sustain wildlife populations. Here, we examine the efficacy of a strategy aimed at preserving a critical movement corridor for boreal woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in northern Québec, Canada, by raising high-voltage power line conductors above the forest canopy. To assess the interplay between the caribou protection objectives and a reduction in power line's exposure to wildfires, we developed an optimization model that combines the objectives of protecting the power line from wildfires via fuel treatments and maintaining a suitable movement corridor for caribou. The model combines a critical node detection (CND) problem with a habitat connectivity problem that allocates a minimum-resistance fixed-width habitat corridor between isolated wildlife refuges. Our results identify the best locations to perform fire fuel treatments to lessen the threat of fire damage to human infrastructure while maintaining a connectivity corridor for caribou in present and future climate scenarios. The selected fuel treatment locations aimed to mitigate wildfire exposure to a power line. In small-budget solutions, the exposure of power line infrastructure to wildfires was reduced by 36–39% in current climate conditions and by 20–31% in future climate, compared with no-treatment scenarios. Despite the detrimental effects of wildfire on both the industrial asset and caribou habitat, the approach provides strategies that help achieve a compromise between these two values. Such knowledge is timely to help mitigate the negative impacts of climate change on human livelihoods and natural ecosystems.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T22:05:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-102006f8b8ab488dbbc27ed87bcc8deb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2624-893X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T22:05:46Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
spelling doaj.art-102006f8b8ab488dbbc27ed87bcc8deb2023-07-24T13:37:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Forests and Global Change2624-893X2023-07-01610.3389/ffgc.2023.11866161186616Balancing wildlife protection and wildfire threat mitigation using a network optimization approachDenys Yemshanov0Denyse A. Dawe1Amanda Bakalarczyk2Ning Liu3Yan Boulanger4Jonathan Boucher5Alexandre Beauchemin6Dominique Arseneault7Mathieu Leblond8Marc-André Parisien9Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, CanadaNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB, CanadaNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, CanadaNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, CanadaNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Québec, QC, CanadaNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Québec, QC, CanadaHydro-Québec, Department of Environment, Montréal, QC, CanadaUniversité du Québec à Rimouski, Department of Biology, Chemistry and Geography, Rimouski, QC, CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, National Wildlife Research Centre, Ottawa, ON, CanadaNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB, CanadaIn boreal forests of North America, land managers often carry out preventive treatments of forest fuel for the protection of human infrastructure from wildfires. However, these treatments may negatively affect other ecosystem services, such as the capacity to sustain wildlife populations. Here, we examine the efficacy of a strategy aimed at preserving a critical movement corridor for boreal woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in northern Québec, Canada, by raising high-voltage power line conductors above the forest canopy. To assess the interplay between the caribou protection objectives and a reduction in power line's exposure to wildfires, we developed an optimization model that combines the objectives of protecting the power line from wildfires via fuel treatments and maintaining a suitable movement corridor for caribou. The model combines a critical node detection (CND) problem with a habitat connectivity problem that allocates a minimum-resistance fixed-width habitat corridor between isolated wildlife refuges. Our results identify the best locations to perform fire fuel treatments to lessen the threat of fire damage to human infrastructure while maintaining a connectivity corridor for caribou in present and future climate scenarios. The selected fuel treatment locations aimed to mitigate wildfire exposure to a power line. In small-budget solutions, the exposure of power line infrastructure to wildfires was reduced by 36–39% in current climate conditions and by 20–31% in future climate, compared with no-treatment scenarios. Despite the detrimental effects of wildfire on both the industrial asset and caribou habitat, the approach provides strategies that help achieve a compromise between these two values. Such knowledge is timely to help mitigate the negative impacts of climate change on human livelihoods and natural ecosystems.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1186616/fullhuman infrastructure protectionwildfire fuel connectivitywoodland cariboucritical node detectionwildlife corridornetwork interdiction
spellingShingle Denys Yemshanov
Denyse A. Dawe
Amanda Bakalarczyk
Ning Liu
Yan Boulanger
Jonathan Boucher
Alexandre Beauchemin
Dominique Arseneault
Mathieu Leblond
Marc-André Parisien
Balancing wildlife protection and wildfire threat mitigation using a network optimization approach
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
human infrastructure protection
wildfire fuel connectivity
woodland caribou
critical node detection
wildlife corridor
network interdiction
title Balancing wildlife protection and wildfire threat mitigation using a network optimization approach
title_full Balancing wildlife protection and wildfire threat mitigation using a network optimization approach
title_fullStr Balancing wildlife protection and wildfire threat mitigation using a network optimization approach
title_full_unstemmed Balancing wildlife protection and wildfire threat mitigation using a network optimization approach
title_short Balancing wildlife protection and wildfire threat mitigation using a network optimization approach
title_sort balancing wildlife protection and wildfire threat mitigation using a network optimization approach
topic human infrastructure protection
wildfire fuel connectivity
woodland caribou
critical node detection
wildlife corridor
network interdiction
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1186616/full
work_keys_str_mv AT denysyemshanov balancingwildlifeprotectionandwildfirethreatmitigationusinganetworkoptimizationapproach
AT denyseadawe balancingwildlifeprotectionandwildfirethreatmitigationusinganetworkoptimizationapproach
AT amandabakalarczyk balancingwildlifeprotectionandwildfirethreatmitigationusinganetworkoptimizationapproach
AT ningliu balancingwildlifeprotectionandwildfirethreatmitigationusinganetworkoptimizationapproach
AT yanboulanger balancingwildlifeprotectionandwildfirethreatmitigationusinganetworkoptimizationapproach
AT jonathanboucher balancingwildlifeprotectionandwildfirethreatmitigationusinganetworkoptimizationapproach
AT alexandrebeauchemin balancingwildlifeprotectionandwildfirethreatmitigationusinganetworkoptimizationapproach
AT dominiquearseneault balancingwildlifeprotectionandwildfirethreatmitigationusinganetworkoptimizationapproach
AT mathieuleblond balancingwildlifeprotectionandwildfirethreatmitigationusinganetworkoptimizationapproach
AT marcandreparisien balancingwildlifeprotectionandwildfirethreatmitigationusinganetworkoptimizationapproach