Wittgenstein: od etyki do ślepego stosowania reguł i z powrotem

The paper discusses Wittgenstein’s approaches to ethics within two contrastive contexts, e.g., pragmatism and cooperative-discursive normative practice. The first section revisits the fiasco of his early “negative” ethics. The second section subsequently shows how Wittgenstein’s mature concept of bl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ewa Nowak
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Adam Mickiewicz University 2019-02-01
Series:Ethics in Progress
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/eip/article/view/17879
_version_ 1818228581745033216
author Ewa Nowak
author_facet Ewa Nowak
author_sort Ewa Nowak
collection DOAJ
description The paper discusses Wittgenstein’s approaches to ethics within two contrastive contexts, e.g., pragmatism and cooperative-discursive normative practice. The first section revisits the fiasco of his early “negative” ethics. The second section subsequently shows how Wittgenstein’s mature concept of blind rule-following displaces normativity but simultaneously becomes the key predictor for discourse ethics (or, rather, a specific kind of it). The final section discusses the pros and cons of finitism in the light of contemporary philosophy of mind. As a conclusion, the author provides evidence for her hypothesis that there is no normative (embodied) mind without a manifest normative competence, which includes moral judgment and discursive competence.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T10:04:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-102324917a00494ba45ae121455c86c6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2084-9257
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-12T10:04:59Z
publishDate 2019-02-01
publisher Adam Mickiewicz University
record_format Article
series Ethics in Progress
spelling doaj.art-102324917a00494ba45ae121455c86c62022-12-22T00:27:54ZdeuAdam Mickiewicz UniversityEthics in Progress2084-92572019-02-019210.14746/eip.2018.2.1016787Wittgenstein: od etyki do ślepego stosowania reguł i z powrotemEwa Nowak0Adam Mickiewicz University in PoznańThe paper discusses Wittgenstein’s approaches to ethics within two contrastive contexts, e.g., pragmatism and cooperative-discursive normative practice. The first section revisits the fiasco of his early “negative” ethics. The second section subsequently shows how Wittgenstein’s mature concept of blind rule-following displaces normativity but simultaneously becomes the key predictor for discourse ethics (or, rather, a specific kind of it). The final section discusses the pros and cons of finitism in the light of contemporary philosophy of mind. As a conclusion, the author provides evidence for her hypothesis that there is no normative (embodied) mind without a manifest normative competence, which includes moral judgment and discursive competence.http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/eip/article/view/17879Wittgensteinethicspragmatismblind rule-followingconsidered and deliberated judgmentDiscourse Ethics
spellingShingle Ewa Nowak
Wittgenstein: od etyki do ślepego stosowania reguł i z powrotem
Ethics in Progress
Wittgenstein
ethics
pragmatism
blind rule-following
considered and deliberated judgment
Discourse Ethics
title Wittgenstein: od etyki do ślepego stosowania reguł i z powrotem
title_full Wittgenstein: od etyki do ślepego stosowania reguł i z powrotem
title_fullStr Wittgenstein: od etyki do ślepego stosowania reguł i z powrotem
title_full_unstemmed Wittgenstein: od etyki do ślepego stosowania reguł i z powrotem
title_short Wittgenstein: od etyki do ślepego stosowania reguł i z powrotem
title_sort wittgenstein od etyki do slepego stosowania regul i z powrotem
topic Wittgenstein
ethics
pragmatism
blind rule-following
considered and deliberated judgment
Discourse Ethics
url http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/eip/article/view/17879
work_keys_str_mv AT ewanowak wittgensteinodetykidoslepegostosowaniaregułizpowrotem