Prognostic Value of Functional Capacity in Different Exercise Protocols

Background Functional capacity is associated with mortality, although the prognostic value of achieved estimated metabolic equivalents (METs) across various exercise protocols is not established. We sought to determine whether achieved METs had different prognostic implications according to the prot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Serge C. Harb, Pavan Bhat, Paul C. Cremer, Yuping Wu, Laura J. Cremer, Stephanie Berger, Leslie Cho, Venu Menon, Martha Gulati, Wael A. Jaber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-07-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.015986
_version_ 1818314912341950464
author Serge C. Harb
Pavan Bhat
Paul C. Cremer
Yuping Wu
Laura J. Cremer
Stephanie Berger
Leslie Cho
Venu Menon
Martha Gulati
Wael A. Jaber
author_facet Serge C. Harb
Pavan Bhat
Paul C. Cremer
Yuping Wu
Laura J. Cremer
Stephanie Berger
Leslie Cho
Venu Menon
Martha Gulati
Wael A. Jaber
author_sort Serge C. Harb
collection DOAJ
description Background Functional capacity is associated with mortality, although the prognostic value of achieved estimated metabolic equivalents (METs) across various exercise protocols is not established. We sought to determine whether achieved METs had different prognostic implications according to the protocol employed. Methods and Results From 1991 to 2015, we identified 120 705 consecutive patients from a stress testing registry who underwent the following 7 different standardized exercise protocols: Bruce, modified Bruce, Cornell 0%, Cornell 5%, Cornell 10%, Naughton, and modified Naughton. The primary outcome was all‐cause mortality. There were 74 953 Bruce, 8368 modified Bruce, 2648 Cornell 0%, 9972 Cornell 5%, 20 425 Cornell 10%, 1226 Naughton, and 3113 modified Naughton protocols. During a mean follow‐up of 8.7 years, a total of 8426 deaths (6.9%) occurred. When compared with the Bruce protocol, after multivariable adjustment for clinical risk factors, medications, and functional capacity, test protocol was independently associated with mortality (modified Naughton [hazard ratio (HR), 2.51; 95% CI, 2.26–2.8], Naughton [HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.57–2.04], Cornell 0% [HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.59–2.01], modified Bruce [HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.48–1.76], Cornell 5% [HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.47–1.75], and Cornell 10% [HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.22–1.42]). Across all protocols, higher estimated METs were associated with lower mortality, although the equivalent METs achieved were associated with a worse prognosis in less‐demanding protocols. Conclusions Higher estimated METs are reliably associated with lower mortality in all exercise protocols, although the prognostic value is not transferable across different tests. Consequently, the prognostic value of METs achieved during a stress test should be considered protocol dependent.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T08:57:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-103294bef0fe499789db141785d561e2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T08:57:11Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-103294bef0fe499789db141785d561e22022-12-21T23:53:15ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802020-07-0191310.1161/JAHA.119.015986Prognostic Value of Functional Capacity in Different Exercise ProtocolsSerge C. Harb0Pavan Bhat1Paul C. Cremer2Yuping Wu3Laura J. Cremer4Stephanie Berger5Leslie Cho6Venu Menon7Martha Gulati8Wael A. Jaber9Heart and Vascular Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OHHeart and Vascular Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OHHeart and Vascular Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OHDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics Cleveland State University Cleveland OHCase Western Reserve University Cleveland OHHeart and Vascular Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OHHeart and Vascular Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OHHeart and Vascular Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OHDivision of Cardiology University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix AZHeart and Vascular Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OHBackground Functional capacity is associated with mortality, although the prognostic value of achieved estimated metabolic equivalents (METs) across various exercise protocols is not established. We sought to determine whether achieved METs had different prognostic implications according to the protocol employed. Methods and Results From 1991 to 2015, we identified 120 705 consecutive patients from a stress testing registry who underwent the following 7 different standardized exercise protocols: Bruce, modified Bruce, Cornell 0%, Cornell 5%, Cornell 10%, Naughton, and modified Naughton. The primary outcome was all‐cause mortality. There were 74 953 Bruce, 8368 modified Bruce, 2648 Cornell 0%, 9972 Cornell 5%, 20 425 Cornell 10%, 1226 Naughton, and 3113 modified Naughton protocols. During a mean follow‐up of 8.7 years, a total of 8426 deaths (6.9%) occurred. When compared with the Bruce protocol, after multivariable adjustment for clinical risk factors, medications, and functional capacity, test protocol was independently associated with mortality (modified Naughton [hazard ratio (HR), 2.51; 95% CI, 2.26–2.8], Naughton [HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.57–2.04], Cornell 0% [HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.59–2.01], modified Bruce [HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.48–1.76], Cornell 5% [HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.47–1.75], and Cornell 10% [HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.22–1.42]). Across all protocols, higher estimated METs were associated with lower mortality, although the equivalent METs achieved were associated with a worse prognosis in less‐demanding protocols. Conclusions Higher estimated METs are reliably associated with lower mortality in all exercise protocols, although the prognostic value is not transferable across different tests. Consequently, the prognostic value of METs achieved during a stress test should be considered protocol dependent.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.015986exercise stress testingmortalitystress testing protocol
spellingShingle Serge C. Harb
Pavan Bhat
Paul C. Cremer
Yuping Wu
Laura J. Cremer
Stephanie Berger
Leslie Cho
Venu Menon
Martha Gulati
Wael A. Jaber
Prognostic Value of Functional Capacity in Different Exercise Protocols
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
exercise stress testing
mortality
stress testing protocol
title Prognostic Value of Functional Capacity in Different Exercise Protocols
title_full Prognostic Value of Functional Capacity in Different Exercise Protocols
title_fullStr Prognostic Value of Functional Capacity in Different Exercise Protocols
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Value of Functional Capacity in Different Exercise Protocols
title_short Prognostic Value of Functional Capacity in Different Exercise Protocols
title_sort prognostic value of functional capacity in different exercise protocols
topic exercise stress testing
mortality
stress testing protocol
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.015986
work_keys_str_mv AT sergecharb prognosticvalueoffunctionalcapacityindifferentexerciseprotocols
AT pavanbhat prognosticvalueoffunctionalcapacityindifferentexerciseprotocols
AT paulccremer prognosticvalueoffunctionalcapacityindifferentexerciseprotocols
AT yupingwu prognosticvalueoffunctionalcapacityindifferentexerciseprotocols
AT laurajcremer prognosticvalueoffunctionalcapacityindifferentexerciseprotocols
AT stephanieberger prognosticvalueoffunctionalcapacityindifferentexerciseprotocols
AT lesliecho prognosticvalueoffunctionalcapacityindifferentexerciseprotocols
AT venumenon prognosticvalueoffunctionalcapacityindifferentexerciseprotocols
AT marthagulati prognosticvalueoffunctionalcapacityindifferentexerciseprotocols
AT waelajaber prognosticvalueoffunctionalcapacityindifferentexerciseprotocols