Critical analysis of laboratory requisition forms received in a cytopathology laboratory of a tertiary care centre: An audit and review of literature
Background: A laboratory requisition form (LRF) is the main communication link between the laboratories and the clinicians. In a cytopathology laboratory, incomplete forms with inadequate information significantly impact the quality of the results and waste precious time of the lab. Aims: The aim of...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Cytology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jcytol.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9371;year=2022;volume=39;issue=3;spage=116;epage=120;aulast=Sehgal |
| _version_ | 1798037432235458560 |
|---|---|
| author | Shivali Sehgal Sujata Jetley Zeeba S Jairajpuri Sabina Khan |
| author_facet | Shivali Sehgal Sujata Jetley Zeeba S Jairajpuri Sabina Khan |
| author_sort | Shivali Sehgal |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: A laboratory requisition form (LRF) is the main communication link between the laboratories and the clinicians. In a cytopathology laboratory, incomplete forms with inadequate information significantly impact the quality of the results and waste precious time of the lab. Aims: The aim of this study was to audit the LRFs for adequacy of demographic and clinical data and to analyze the reasons for the same. Settings and Design: A retrospective study was conducted in the cytopathology laboratory of a tertiary care center. Materials and Methods: All the original LRFs received for Pap smears and FNACs of 1-month duration were retrieved. The forms were scrutinized for the presence of specific parameters which were classified as patient information, clinician information and clinical information. In addition to the completeness of the form, clarity of the data was also noted. Statistical Analysis: The data were entered on excel worksheets and percentage of Pap smear and FNAC forms lacking information of various parameters was calculated. Results: A total of 431 LRFs were received in the month of January 2020. These included 274 Pap smear LRFs and 157 FNAC LRFs. Patient information was mentioned in predominantly all the forms, however, clinician and clinical information, which is indispensible for reporting, was missing in a significant proportion of the Pap smear and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) forms. Conclusions: Receiving inadequately filled LRFs has been an age-old problem in all medical laboratories. Audit of inadequacy of LRFs helped in assessing the prevailing practices in the hospital and gave an insight into the quality of information available to the cytologists for reporting. Many clinicians withhold information out of ignorance about its importance or due to lack of time to fill up the details on the LRF. Also, filling out a LRF is a task usually delegated to the junior doctor in the OPD and the significance of filling the LRF correctly and comprehensively is often not emphasized upon adequately by the senior clinicians. This audit helped us taking preventive action by giving feedback to the clinicians and emphasizing to them the importance of clinical data on the LRF and in improvising the LRF using a more objective and user-friendly format. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T21:26:27Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-10357c4e3ca643a38a1c774e56da8513 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0970-9371 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T21:26:27Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Cytology |
| spelling | doaj.art-10357c4e3ca643a38a1c774e56da85132022-12-22T04:02:22ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Cytology0970-93712022-01-0139311612010.4103/joc.joc_160_21Critical analysis of laboratory requisition forms received in a cytopathology laboratory of a tertiary care centre: An audit and review of literatureShivali SehgalSujata JetleyZeeba S JairajpuriSabina KhanBackground: A laboratory requisition form (LRF) is the main communication link between the laboratories and the clinicians. In a cytopathology laboratory, incomplete forms with inadequate information significantly impact the quality of the results and waste precious time of the lab. Aims: The aim of this study was to audit the LRFs for adequacy of demographic and clinical data and to analyze the reasons for the same. Settings and Design: A retrospective study was conducted in the cytopathology laboratory of a tertiary care center. Materials and Methods: All the original LRFs received for Pap smears and FNACs of 1-month duration were retrieved. The forms were scrutinized for the presence of specific parameters which were classified as patient information, clinician information and clinical information. In addition to the completeness of the form, clarity of the data was also noted. Statistical Analysis: The data were entered on excel worksheets and percentage of Pap smear and FNAC forms lacking information of various parameters was calculated. Results: A total of 431 LRFs were received in the month of January 2020. These included 274 Pap smear LRFs and 157 FNAC LRFs. Patient information was mentioned in predominantly all the forms, however, clinician and clinical information, which is indispensible for reporting, was missing in a significant proportion of the Pap smear and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) forms. Conclusions: Receiving inadequately filled LRFs has been an age-old problem in all medical laboratories. Audit of inadequacy of LRFs helped in assessing the prevailing practices in the hospital and gave an insight into the quality of information available to the cytologists for reporting. Many clinicians withhold information out of ignorance about its importance or due to lack of time to fill up the details on the LRF. Also, filling out a LRF is a task usually delegated to the junior doctor in the OPD and the significance of filling the LRF correctly and comprehensively is often not emphasized upon adequately by the senior clinicians. This audit helped us taking preventive action by giving feedback to the clinicians and emphasizing to them the importance of clinical data on the LRF and in improvising the LRF using a more objective and user-friendly format.http://www.jcytol.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9371;year=2022;volume=39;issue=3;spage=116;epage=120;aulast=Sehgalauditcytopathology laboratorylaboratory requisition form |
| spellingShingle | Shivali Sehgal Sujata Jetley Zeeba S Jairajpuri Sabina Khan Critical analysis of laboratory requisition forms received in a cytopathology laboratory of a tertiary care centre: An audit and review of literature Journal of Cytology audit cytopathology laboratory laboratory requisition form |
| title | Critical analysis of laboratory requisition forms received in a cytopathology laboratory of a tertiary care centre: An audit and review of literature |
| title_full | Critical analysis of laboratory requisition forms received in a cytopathology laboratory of a tertiary care centre: An audit and review of literature |
| title_fullStr | Critical analysis of laboratory requisition forms received in a cytopathology laboratory of a tertiary care centre: An audit and review of literature |
| title_full_unstemmed | Critical analysis of laboratory requisition forms received in a cytopathology laboratory of a tertiary care centre: An audit and review of literature |
| title_short | Critical analysis of laboratory requisition forms received in a cytopathology laboratory of a tertiary care centre: An audit and review of literature |
| title_sort | critical analysis of laboratory requisition forms received in a cytopathology laboratory of a tertiary care centre an audit and review of literature |
| topic | audit cytopathology laboratory laboratory requisition form |
| url | http://www.jcytol.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9371;year=2022;volume=39;issue=3;spage=116;epage=120;aulast=Sehgal |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT shivalisehgal criticalanalysisoflaboratoryrequisitionformsreceivedinacytopathologylaboratoryofatertiarycarecentreanauditandreviewofliterature AT sujatajetley criticalanalysisoflaboratoryrequisitionformsreceivedinacytopathologylaboratoryofatertiarycarecentreanauditandreviewofliterature AT zeebasjairajpuri criticalanalysisoflaboratoryrequisitionformsreceivedinacytopathologylaboratoryofatertiarycarecentreanauditandreviewofliterature AT sabinakhan criticalanalysisoflaboratoryrequisitionformsreceivedinacytopathologylaboratoryofatertiarycarecentreanauditandreviewofliterature |