Electroosmotic reinforcement mechanism and laboratory tests of pulsating direct current with a high energy efficiency ratio
Based on the electroosmotic reinforcement mechanism of pulsating direct current (PDC) with a high energy efficiency ratio, the calculation method of PDC electroosmosis drainage rate was verified under different potential gradients using two forms of voltage loading, i.e., constant direct current (CD...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2024-02-01
|
Series: | Soils and Foundations |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624000015 |
_version_ | 1827348478288723968 |
---|---|
author | Xunli Zhang Lingwei Zheng Shangqi Ge Xudong Zheng Xinyu Xie |
author_facet | Xunli Zhang Lingwei Zheng Shangqi Ge Xudong Zheng Xinyu Xie |
author_sort | Xunli Zhang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Based on the electroosmotic reinforcement mechanism of pulsating direct current (PDC) with a high energy efficiency ratio, the calculation method of PDC electroosmosis drainage rate was verified under different potential gradients using two forms of voltage loading, i.e., constant direct current (CDC) and PDC. The drainage weight and electric current were achieved by laboratory tests, and then the energy efficiency ratio, soil resistivity and contact resistance was calculated. The energy consumption of each test group was analyzed by considering the initial potential gradient. The obtained results show that under the same potential gradient, the difference in soil resistivity and electroosmotic drainage between PDC and CDC is not significant, but there is a significant difference in contact resistance, which leads to low current intensity and high energy efficiency ratio in the PDC test group. The expression of the electroosmotic drainage rate of the PDC is described with the coefficient μ, and then the energy efficiency ratio versus potential gradient curve is calculated, which is in good agreement with the experimental results. The reason for the lower energy consumption of PDC electroosmosis compared to CDC is described in terms of the drainage mechanism of electroosmosis. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T00:12:47Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-1077b267128348cba649c920c042f04a |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2524-1788 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T00:12:47Z |
publishDate | 2024-02-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Soils and Foundations |
spelling | doaj.art-1077b267128348cba649c920c042f04a2024-02-17T06:37:10ZengElsevierSoils and Foundations2524-17882024-02-01641101423Electroosmotic reinforcement mechanism and laboratory tests of pulsating direct current with a high energy efficiency ratioXunli Zhang0Lingwei Zheng1Shangqi Ge2Xudong Zheng3Xinyu Xie4Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, ChinaNingboTech University, Ningbo 315100, ChinaResearch Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, ChinaInstitute of Wenzhou, Zhejiang University, Wenzhou 325000, ChinaResearch Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Institute of Wenzhou, Zhejiang University, Wenzhou 325000, China; Corresponding author at: Institute of Wenzhou, Zhejiang University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.Based on the electroosmotic reinforcement mechanism of pulsating direct current (PDC) with a high energy efficiency ratio, the calculation method of PDC electroosmosis drainage rate was verified under different potential gradients using two forms of voltage loading, i.e., constant direct current (CDC) and PDC. The drainage weight and electric current were achieved by laboratory tests, and then the energy efficiency ratio, soil resistivity and contact resistance was calculated. The energy consumption of each test group was analyzed by considering the initial potential gradient. The obtained results show that under the same potential gradient, the difference in soil resistivity and electroosmotic drainage between PDC and CDC is not significant, but there is a significant difference in contact resistance, which leads to low current intensity and high energy efficiency ratio in the PDC test group. The expression of the electroosmotic drainage rate of the PDC is described with the coefficient μ, and then the energy efficiency ratio versus potential gradient curve is calculated, which is in good agreement with the experimental results. The reason for the lower energy consumption of PDC electroosmosis compared to CDC is described in terms of the drainage mechanism of electroosmosis.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624000015Electroosmosis methodPulsating direct currentContact resistanceInitial potential gradientEnergy efficiency ratio |
spellingShingle | Xunli Zhang Lingwei Zheng Shangqi Ge Xudong Zheng Xinyu Xie Electroosmotic reinforcement mechanism and laboratory tests of pulsating direct current with a high energy efficiency ratio Soils and Foundations Electroosmosis method Pulsating direct current Contact resistance Initial potential gradient Energy efficiency ratio |
title | Electroosmotic reinforcement mechanism and laboratory tests of pulsating direct current with a high energy efficiency ratio |
title_full | Electroosmotic reinforcement mechanism and laboratory tests of pulsating direct current with a high energy efficiency ratio |
title_fullStr | Electroosmotic reinforcement mechanism and laboratory tests of pulsating direct current with a high energy efficiency ratio |
title_full_unstemmed | Electroosmotic reinforcement mechanism and laboratory tests of pulsating direct current with a high energy efficiency ratio |
title_short | Electroosmotic reinforcement mechanism and laboratory tests of pulsating direct current with a high energy efficiency ratio |
title_sort | electroosmotic reinforcement mechanism and laboratory tests of pulsating direct current with a high energy efficiency ratio |
topic | Electroosmosis method Pulsating direct current Contact resistance Initial potential gradient Energy efficiency ratio |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624000015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xunlizhang electroosmoticreinforcementmechanismandlaboratorytestsofpulsatingdirectcurrentwithahighenergyefficiencyratio AT lingweizheng electroosmoticreinforcementmechanismandlaboratorytestsofpulsatingdirectcurrentwithahighenergyefficiencyratio AT shangqige electroosmoticreinforcementmechanismandlaboratorytestsofpulsatingdirectcurrentwithahighenergyefficiencyratio AT xudongzheng electroosmoticreinforcementmechanismandlaboratorytestsofpulsatingdirectcurrentwithahighenergyefficiencyratio AT xinyuxie electroosmoticreinforcementmechanismandlaboratorytestsofpulsatingdirectcurrentwithahighenergyefficiencyratio |